Re: Bugzilla and Groups

On 12/22/23 10:55, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 01:19:46PM -0700, Tim Flink wrote: What are the general rules around default bugzilla assignee for packages? I'm trying to set the default assignee for rocm-cmake to rocm-packagers-sig but keep getting an error: Unable to update

Bugzilla and Groups

What are the general rules around default bugzilla assignee for packages? I'm trying to set the default assignee for rocm-cmake to rocm-packagers-sig but keep getting an error: Unable to update the bugzilla assignee(s): Invalid user or group name as fedora_assignee As far as I know,

Re: GitLab Grouping and Naming

On 8/7/23 13:04, Kevin Fenzi wrote: This might have to be something that we have a meeting to discuss and figure out a scheme? Sure, or the scheme below seems good to me. cheers, ryanlerch Hi Ryan, We more or less discussed that with Kevin in the past and for CentOS groups (all

Re: SOP for adding externally hosted services?

On 5/4/23 13:18, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 06:54:33PM -0600, Tim Flink wrote: We're looking to deploy an instance of ReportPortal [1] for displaying and analyzing the output of automated tests in Fedora. This aligns with the goals of Testing Farm and instead of having

SOP for adding externally hosted services?

We're looking to deploy an instance of ReportPortal [1] for displaying and analyzing the output of automated tests in Fedora. This aligns with the goals of Testing Farm and instead of having it hosted with the other Fedora hosted apps, it looks to be easier to rely on their

Re: Freeze Break Request: Blockerbugs Hotfix to Deal With RHBZ Change

, Sep 13, 2021 at 12:49:21PM -0600, Tim Flink wrote: It turns out that the configuration for rhbz was changed without an announcement and now the max number of bugs returned for any query is 20. Some of the queries that we use in blockerbugs return more than 20 bugs so I have a hotfix to deal

Freeze Break Request: Blockerbugs Hotfix to Deal With RHBZ Change

It turns out that the configuration for rhbz was changed without an announcement and now the max number of bugs returned for any query is 20. Some of the queries that we use in blockerbugs return more than 20 bugs so I have a hotfix to deal with the new pagination requirements. I've attached

Re: Hosting Options for QA Projects

On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 14:25:28 -0700 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 03:04:51PM -0600, Tim Flink wrote: > > From what I understand, communishift as it was originally planned is > > not likely to be a thing going forward. We had been planning to use > > >

Hosting Options for QA Projects

>From what I understand, communishift as it was originally planned is not likely to be a thing going forward. We had been planning to use communishift to host a number of QA projects and we're looking for new options going forward. Those projects are: Testdays [1] is an app that we use to help

Bot Account for Bodhi Karma

After the Flock talk from the Facebook folks, they approached QA about the idea of submitting karma and/or test results from their internal testing as a bot account. Is this something that is possible? I know that we have done bot accounts at various points in time but I don't remember if

Re: FBR: update libtaskotron on production taskotron workers

I've updated the libtaskotron packages for production taskotron, thanks for the +1s Tim On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 14:10:36 -0600 Tim Flink wrote: > It turns out that we've been getting rpmlintrc files from the cgit > interface over dist-git which went away earlier this week. As a > co

FBR: update libtaskotron on production taskotron workers

It turns out that we've been getting rpmlintrc files from the cgit interface over dist-git which went away earlier this week. As a consequence, package-specific rpmlintrc files are not being used anymore. The fix itself is simple:

Planned Outage: Taskotron 2019-04-09 16:00 UTC

There will be an outage starting at 2019-04-09 16:00 UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2019-04-09 16:00UTC' Reason for outage: Major upgrade to Taskotron Affected

Re: [FBR] proxies: fix logic for websockets in reversepassproxy

There was a bit of a miscommunication and a fix for this was pushed to ansible while I was waiting for +1s on this and it's no longer needed. I'll cleanup the template once freeze lifts since it's working now. Tim On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 15:07:55 -0600 Tim Flink wrote: > The last patch I

Re: [FBR] proxies: fix logic for websockets in reversepassproxy (small change from first one)

I forgot to make a change in the regexp for the RewriteCond - new patch follows: The last patch I did for this added some bits that didn't need to be there and made a bad assumption about the default value for remotepath for the reversepassproxy.conf template. This ended up with unneccesarry

[FBR] proxies: fix logic for websockets in reversepassproxy

The last patch I did for this added some bits that didn't need to be there and made a bad assumption about the default value for remotepath for the reversepassproxy.conf template. This ended up with unneccesarry complication in the ws balancers and a unintended RewriteCond for any declared

Re: [FBR] proxies: adding rewritecond to reverseproxy for ws if remotepath exists

Thanks for the +1s. Pushed to ansible repo and has been run on proxies-stg. Tim On Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:04:37 -0600 Tim Flink wrote: > I was hitting an issue where there were multiple reverseproxy > instances configured for a single host and some of the rewrite rules > were changing th

[FBR] proxies: adding rewritecond to reverseproxy for ws if remotepath exists

I was hitting an issue where there were multiple reverseproxy instances configured for a single host and some of the rewrite rules were changing the request when they shouldn't be. This patch adds a rewritecond to the websocket rewrite rule to make sure that the REQUEST_URI starts with

Re: FBR: Adding remotepath to websocket balancers

On Fri, 22 Mar 2019 16:17:55 +0100 Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 04:48:11PM -0600, Tim Flink wrote: > > The current template assumes that websockets are at the base of a > > URL but that is not true for our buildmaster. This patch adds > >

FBR: Adding remotepath to websocket balancers

The current template assumes that websockets are at the base of a URL but that is not true for our buildmaster. This patch adds remotepath to the end of the websocket url if remotepath is defined. --- roles/httpd/reverseproxy/templates/reversepassproxy.conf | 8 1 file changed, 8

Re: How to get invite for joining Fi-apprentice group?

On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 05:43:34 - "Marut Pandya" wrote: > How do i join fi-apprentice group? > My login name is- pandyamarut > please send me invite. The getting started page is the best place to get started:

Re: FBR: Add CSS handling to Taskotron artifacts serving

On Fri, 2 Jun 2017 10:06:56 -0600 Tim Flink <tfl...@redhat.com> wrote: > The modularity-testing-framework tests use avocado to output nice HTML > reports but due to the way that we store and serve the artifacts, the > css doesn't load properly. An example (that shoul

FBR: Add CSS handling to Taskotron artifacts serving

The modularity-testing-framework tests use avocado to output nice HTML reports but due to the way that we store and serve the artifacts, the css doesn't load properly. An example (that should work post-fix) is:

[FBR] Add upstreamfirst.fedorainfracloud.org to DNS

I'm planning to set up a pagure instance in the cloud as a place to collect testcases that Red Hat will be releasing for upstream consumption and collaborate on the tests as they change into a form that could be accepted by Fedora package maintaners. The request is tracked in the following ticket:

Freeze Break Request: increase threads for resultsdb_frontend wsgi daemon

Production resultsdb_frontend is also really slow and I'd like to bump it's resources at the same time I bump resultsdb from the other FBR. +1s? Tim From 9757a01edfe14a2455f523d0ac7cb8cfb4e92f8e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tim Flink <tfl...@fedoraproject.org> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 16

Freeze Break Request: increase threads for resultsdb wsgi daemon

Production resultsdb is still really slow and we're still seeing the occasional error on result posting so I'd like to bump the resources allocated to the wsgi app again. +1s? Tim From 3d45155959cbdcde39c1a98a584a100b590761db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tim Flink <tfl...@fedoraproject.

Re: Freeze Break Request: enable package-specific tasks for Taskotron production

On Fri, 17 Mar 2017 09:37:07 +0100 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:44:37PM -0600, Tim Flink wrote: > > This has been pending for a long time and now that the bureaucratic > > stuff has been figured out and our dev/stg instances

Re: FBR: Fix koji monitoring from noc02

On Fri, 17 Mar 2017 13:28:31 + Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > Hi all, > > So, our noc02 monitoring of Koji build targets broke because the > modularity stuff pushed rawhide to the second page :). > Can I get +1s to start testing for "infra" instead, which should match >

Re: Freeze Break Request: increase threads on resultsdb wsgi daemon

On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 06:47:40 -0600 Tim Flink <tfl...@redhat.com> wrote: > Production resultsdb has started having issues in the last 12 hours or > so that appear to be associated with increased load > (https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/T929). Applied, thanks for the +1s Tim pg

Re: Freeze Break Request: increase threads on resultsdb wsgi daemon

On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 06:47:40 -0600 Tim Flink <tfl...@redhat.com> wrote: > Production resultsdb has started having issues in the last 12 hours or > so that appear to be associated with increased load > (https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/T929). > > As a quick patch to keep th

Freeze Break Request: increase threads on resultsdb wsgi daemon

the corresponding change in git. +1s? Tim From 7f3ba1b5294fd91ba60e8d4173f0c20af1e34bf2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tim Flink <tfl...@fedoraproject.org> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 12:44:14 + Subject: [PATCH] bumping wsgi daemon threads to 20 for resultsdb prod --- roles/taskotron/res

Re: Freeze Break: Add F24-Taskotron to the PXE menu on noc01

On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 10:55:11 -0700 Tim Flink <tfl...@redhat.com> wrote: > We're starting to rebuild our dev instance (not under freeze) but I > need to install F24 on one of the machines via PXE boot. The patch I > would be applying and pushing out to noc01 is attached to this

Freeze Break: Add F24-Taskotron to the PXE menu on noc01

From: Tim Flink <tfl...@fedoraproject.org> Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 17:52:21 + Subject: [PATCH] adding F24 PXE menu entry for Taskotron hosts --- roles/tftp_server/files/default.noc01.phx2.fedoraproject.org | 5 + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/roles/tftp_server

Re: Freeze break request: Fix blocker bug proposal

On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 11:29:12 -0600 Tim Flink <tfl...@redhat.com> wrote: > There was an issue reported last week about using the blockerbugs app > to propose new blocker bugs. > > It turned out to be a simple fix and a new build has been deployed to > stg. > > Can I g

Freeze break request: Fix blocker bug proposal

There was an issue reported last week about using the blockerbugs app to propose new blocker bugs. It turned out to be a simple fix and a new build has been deployed to stg. Can I get +1s to update production blockerbugs? The change to the app itself is:

Re: Freeze Break Request (Retroactive): Adding new staging database host for testing in qa

On Wed, 10 Aug 2016 09:10:48 -0600 Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > On Wed, 10 Aug 2016 16:56:20 +0200 > Tim Flink <tfl...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > I completely forgot that we were in Alpha freeze earlier today and > > made some changes without reque

Freeze Break Request (Retroactive): Adding new staging database host for testing in qa

I completely forgot that we were in Alpha freeze earlier today and made some changes without requesting a freeze break. The changes shouldn't impact production in any meaningful way but I can back all the changes out if need be. In summary, I did the following: - created new dns entries for

Re: Bugzilla+fedmsg, 2016-03-29

On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:17:33 -0400 Ralph Bean wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:33:16AM -0400, Ralph Bean wrote: > > There's a Bugzilla outage scheduled for 00:00 2016-03-29 UTC. > > > > If everything goes to plan, bugzilla should start transmitting > > messages about

Re: Bugzilla+fedmsg, 2016-03-29

On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 10:33:16 -0400 Ralph Bean wrote: > There's a Bugzilla outage scheduled for 00:00 2016-03-29 UTC. > > If everything goes to plan, bugzilla should start transmitting > messages about changes to bug tickets shortly after this outage is > complete. We have a

Re: Freeze break: cachefilesd

On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 16:08:41 -0600 Kevin Fenzi wrote: +1 sounds reasonable and something that will be very useful to have sooner than later. Tim > Greetings. > > I'd like to take download05 out of dns and test out using cachefilesd > on it. We tried this a number of years

Re: [PATCH] [wiki] Disable captcha for logged in users and on login

On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 17:48:39 + Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > Signed-off-by: Patrick Uiterwijk > --- > roles/mediawiki/templates/LocalSettings.php.fp.j2 | 7 +++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git

Re: Freeze Break Request: Let openqa01.qa publish to the fedmsg bus

On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:56:15 -0500 Ralph Bean wrote: +1 from me as well. Tim pgpxBH5KMFi9G.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Group vars for tasktotron- prod stg and dev

think it'd be worth the time. Tim > Dave Shier / odin2016 > > > On 12/02/2015 10:14 AM, Tim Flink wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:17:46 -0500 > > David Shier <davidjsh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Comments inline for the dev patch, stg and prod have similar >

Re: Group vars for tasktotron- prod stg and dev

On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:17:46 -0500 David Shier wrote: Comments inline for the dev patch, stg and prod have similar comments. +csi_security_category: Moderate +csi_primary_contact: #fedora-admin infrastruct...@fedoraproject.org +csi_purpose: Run automated tasks, such as

Freeze Break Request: Update Taskotron configuration

This is a retroactive freeze break request - due to a misunderstanding of the process, the change has already been pushed to the ansible repo. Taskotron configuration needs an update as repo locations change once a branched release is actually released. The change is to a single configuration

Re: Freeze break request: rework developer rss feed updating

On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 08:47:44 -0700 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > We ran into an issue today with the developer.fedoraproject.org site. > > Every once in a while it would show up with some really old blog > content. > > Turns out we pull the site from github at :25 after the hour, and

Re: Freeze break request: sync out f23 atomic too

On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 16:13:04 -0700 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Looks like we are not syncing out the f23 updates/updates-testing > repos yet. > > +1s? +1 Tim pgpOlroWw2_8S.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ infrastructure

Re: Freeze break requeest: add script to make OpenVPN always fix its routes

On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:11:51 -0400 (EDT) Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > Can I get any +1s? > This will guarantee that the routes will have been created when the > OpenVPN link is up. +1 - must protect the virtual kittens traveling over openvpn wires in order to avoid the lava

Re: rbac_playbook fix for RHEL7

On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 08:27:01 -0600 Tim Flink <tfl...@redhat.com> wrote: > Long story short, when the batcave upgrade happened on Friday we found > out that rbac_playbook doesn't work on el7 due to an issue with > nss-altfiles. > > I figured out how to sidestep the issue by

Re: rbac_playbook fix for RHEL7

> Why the change here? Why the addition of bash? No changed, just a slightly botched diff. New, properly done diff at the end of this email but that should be the only discrepancy. > > +def can_run(acl, username, playbook_file): > > """ determines whether the current user is allowed to

Freeze Break Request: add robots.txt to public facing taskotron instances

For some reason, yahoo's bot has been hitting our taskotron instance really hard all of a sudden - slowing it down enough to trigger nagios alerts twice this week. There is a robots.txt served by the buildmaster instance but since that isn't at the webroot in our setup, bots may not read it. I'd

Re: Freeze Break Request: add robots.txt to public facing taskotron instances

On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 11:53:49 -0600 Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote: snip I'd like to add a robots.txt to the public facing taskotron instances so that we can avoid this in the future. Rendered content of the robots.txt is at the end of this email. snip New robots.txt applied to taskotron

Re: bodhi2 plans

On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 11:03:38 -0600 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: Greetings. So, in the releng meeting last week we discussed about landing bodhi2 before the alpha freeze started, however there were just too many things still up in the air to do that, so we held off. However, I'd

Re: Freeze break request: fix backups for qadevel.qa.fedoraproject.org

On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 14:07:56 -0600 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: qadevel.qa.fedoraproject.org uses port 222 for ssh shell access. ansible is happy using port 222 just fine, but rdiff-backup isn't. It uses port 22 by default, and fails. The following patch should fix this issue.

Re: Freeze Break Request: Whitelist copr-be for fedmsg

On Tue, 19 May 2015 11:18:05 -0400 Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com wrote: copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org got a new IP in the upgrade going on today, so we need to change the whitelist listing for inbound fedmsg connections. I've already pushed the change out, but can I get two retroactive +1s?

Re: Freeze break request: update python-bugzilla on bodhi*

On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 15:44:42 +0200 Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, Red Hat Bugzilla got upgraded to a version that no longer has the Bug.get_bugs API call. There is a new python-bugzilla available that uses the new

Re: Freeze break request: Update servers with new python-bugzilla

On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 18:17:22 +0200 Patrick Uiterwijk puiterw...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, I would like to ask for +1 to update all other servers running python-bugzilla. The list is below: bvirthost08.phx2.fedoraproject.org

Re: Freeze Break Request: add long query logging to db-qa01.qa

On Mon, 6 Apr 2015 10:33:15 -0600 Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote: I'm not crazy about doing this during freeze but I'm worried that the timeout problem will start affecting more than stg before long and want to get this figured out before that happens. As an update - I'm not ignoring

Re: Freeze Break Request: add long query logging to db-qa01.qa

On Mon, 6 Apr 2015 13:38:29 -0600 Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 6 Apr 2015 10:33:15 -0600 Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote: I'm not crazy about doing this during freeze but I'm worried that the timeout problem will start affecting more than stg before long and want to get

Freeze Break Request: add db for execdb-stg to db-qa01.qa

We had intended to do this before freeze but managed to miss it. One of the upcoming features for taskotron that we've deployed to dev and want to deploy to staging is execdb - task execution tracking for Taskotron. This requires adding a database to db-qa01.qa which is the db host for the

Re: Freeze break: sudoers on koji01/02

On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 09:24:28 -0600 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: I'd like to allow sysadmin-releng (which already has shell access) sudo also on the koji hubs. This will allow us to have mikem able to debug our kojiria issues. +1s? +1 from me as well pgpv_fl_UDOOL.pgp

Re: Freeze Break Request: add db for execdb-stg to db-qa01.qa

On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 17:16:27 +0200 Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr wrote: On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 08:47:43AM -0600, Tim Flink wrote: We had intended to do this before freeze but managed to miss it. One of the upcoming features for taskotron that we've deployed to dev and want

Re: FYI retroactive freeze break: koji ssl connection timeout increase hotfix

On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 11:35:32 -0600 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: A few times in the last week we have hit a state where kojira on koji02 times out and doesn't run newrepo tasks for buildroots. Restarting the httpd on koji01 seems to unstick it, but this is not a good even stop gap as

Re: Freeze break: fix log sync script on log01

On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 10:37:33 -0600 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: log01 pulls httpd logs from proxys. When it was added, proxy11 wasn't right, this corrects it and saves us a cron email every night with the error: +1 pgpwab4ehf8xy.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Freeze break: run some playbooks

On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 10:34:40 -0600 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: I'd like to run a few playbooks to roll up changes made just before freeze. These should only change the indicated stuff thats already in git below. If it causes any issues, we should find out now, instead of later in the

Re: Freeze Break Request: add db for execdb-stg to db-qa01.qa

On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 08:47:43 -0600 Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote: We had intended to do this before freeze but managed to miss it. One of the upcoming features for taskotron that we've deployed to dev and want to deploy to staging is execdb - task execution tracking for Taskotron

Announcement: Replacing old rbac-playbook with ansible_utils

While the rbac-playbook script helps people run playbooks, it's missing some significant features that make ansible much easier to use. We're replacing the old rbac-playbook script with a new piece of code that does the same role-based access control but has some new features. The usage of

Re: retroactive freeze break request: kojipkgs01

On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 08:11:50 -0700 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: We have been having some persistent issues with kojipkgs01 lately. kojipkgs01 is our squid proxy in front of koji builds. It allows users and builders to get fast access to packages. (When it's working). Lately, it's

Re: Freeze break: update iptables

On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 06:59:16 -0700 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: So, currently our iptables config is generated by a template in ansible. In that template we add in all the ip's of staging hosts on the production hosts (to make sure we block them all from talking to production and

Re: [PATCH] Increase the max size allowed for upload to 25Kb

On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:49:45 +0100 Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr wrote: On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 09:46:32AM -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote: On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 03:44:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: diff --git a/roles/kerneltest/templates/kerneltest.cfg

Re: freeze break: update an alias

On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 14:38:50 -0700 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: A trivial freeze break request. I'd apply then run bastion playbooks. Fixes ticket 4677 diff --git a/roles/fas_client/files/aliases.template b/roles/fas_client/files/aliases.template index 408ce61..165c351 100644

Re: Code Search for Fedora

On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 13:00:22 -0800 Michael Stapelberg michael+fed...@stapelberg.ch wrote: Hey, Recently I’ve been talking to Hannes (cc'ed) about whether Fedora would be interested in having the equivalent of http://codesearch.debian.net/¹ The project came to live as my Bachelor of

Re: freeze break: drop python-bugzilla hotfix

On Mon, 1 Dec 2014 12:31:58 -0700 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: We currently have a hotfix for python-bugzilla in puppet. This is breaking the newer version of python-bugzilla that reviewstatus uses. ie, if we update to the newer version it's got this hotfix against the old version it

Re: Freeze Break Request: new depcheck on taskotron clients

On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:57:15 -0700 Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote: snip I'd like to update the depcheck task in production to fix some recurring issues that some devs have been complaining about. Diff is at the end of this email. Depcheck in taskotron production has been updated

Freeze Break Request: update libtaskotorn on taskotron production systems

Long story short: bodhi has been having intermittent network issues for a while now and those network issues tend to kill taskotron tasks. We implemented some retries in order to mitigate the effects of those network issues but I botched one of the last builds and it didn't actually get deployed

Freeze break request: blockerbugs bugfix to correctly sync updates

We found a bug in the blockerbugs app yesterday that is preventing updates from being properly synced and leaving us with an empty page of pending updates: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/21/alpha/updates I'd like to deploy a new version of blockerbugs with the fix for that

Re: Moving Taskotron to Production

On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:12:36 -0600 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 10:56:12 -0600 Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote: Now that Taskotron staging is up and running, I'm not sure what's generally required for services before moving to production. I'm still working

Re: Congrats to Tim Flink

On Sat, 9 Aug 2014 06:49:46 -0600 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: I'm happy to announce that I have approved Tim into the sysadmin-main group. This is the core group of trusted folks that high level access to most things. Tim is part of the Fedora QA group and has been working very hard

Moving Taskotron to Production

Now that Taskotron staging is up and running, I'm not sure what's generally required for services before moving to production. I'm still working out a few kinks in the initial production systems but I think that the only big thing left is the proxy settings, which I'm leaving alone for the

Re: Review for new rbac_playbook

On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 16:27:15 -0600 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: snip If that's the way that we want to go, we'll have some extra commits to the ansible repo but it'll work. Yeah, I think a bit of messyness in the repo is better than having to bother with -P in rbac-playbook... just

Re: Review for new rbac_playbook

On Mon, 09 Jun 2014 17:37:06 +0200 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org wrote: Le lundi 09 juin 2014 à 08:44 -0600, Tim Flink a écrit : The QA devel folks use phabricator and phabricator supports git repo hosting (through http(s) and ssh). In order to support git over ssh while keeping user

Re: Review for new rbac_playbook

On Wed, 4 Jun 2014 19:45:23 -0600 Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote: I've been working to rewrite and extend the script that we've been using to control playbook execution for folks who are not in sysadmin-main. https://bitbucket.org/tflink/rbac-ansible With the removal of the '-P' option

Re: Review for new rbac_playbook

On Sat, 07 Jun 2014 16:26:45 +0100 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org wrote: Le mercredi 04 juin 2014 à 19:45 -0600, Tim Flink a écrit : I've been working to rewrite and extend the script that we've been using to control playbook execution for folks who are not in sysadmin-main. https

Re: Review for new rbac_playbook

On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 08:49:48 -0600 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 08:44:38 -0600 Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote: I think that most of your concerns have been addressed or are being discussed in other parts of this thread but I wanted to speak towards the reason

Review for new rbac_playbook

I've been working to rewrite and extend the script that we've been using to control playbook execution for folks who are not in sysadmin-main. https://bitbucket.org/tflink/rbac-ansible I've been testing the script but before we actually start using it on lockbox01, I'd appreciate a review of the

Re: QA Client Network Isolation and FAS Groups

On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 13:26:30 -0700 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:11:51 -0700 Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote: The one thing that isn't part of that diagram is some sort of lockbox-ish host for managing and monitoring the clients. I'm still not sure how we

Re: QA Client Network Isolation and FAS Groups

On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 16:09:05 -0700 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 11:09:16 -0700 Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote: For network isolation, I don't pretend to be an expert on networking so I'll describe the functionality that we're looking for and what I think

QA Client Network Isolation and FAS Groups

One of the things that QA is focusing on ATM is getting better automation support for Fedora. We're currently doing this in two ways (that will eventually combine): - taskotron (replacing autoqa) - beaker (different type of system - used by Red Hat QE, who is interested in running some of

Re: QA Client Network Isolation and FAS Groups

On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 11:29:40 -0700 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 11:09:16 -0700 Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote: One of the things that QA is focusing on ATM is getting better automation support for Fedora. We're currently doing this in two ways

Re: 2014 dreaming

On Wed, 8 Jan 2014 11:18:29 -0500 Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com wrote: snip One more for the list: * Increased automatic QA/continuous integration: - More tests posting back to bodhi. Actually, one of my goals is to kill off the current method of posting to bodhi. In my mind, it's the

Freeze break request: Configuring backups for qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org

I've recently set up a phabricator instance to trial for qa work. Even though it's a dev host, we're still using it as our bug tracker etc. and I'd like to have it backed up. This patch adds qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org as a host to be backed up and adds /srv/backup (where the mysqldump goes)

Re: Freeze break request: Configuring backups for qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org

On Fri, 1 Nov 2013 15:53:54 -0600 Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote: With that +2, I've committed and pushed the change. Thanks, Tim I've recently set up a phabricator instance to trial for qa work. Even though it's a dev host, we're still using it as our bug tracker etc. and I'd like

Freeze Break Request - Fixing Blocker Proposal in Blockerbugs App (third and hopefully final try)

Hopefully third time's the charm for this freeze break request. I changed the code so that it no longer uses cookies for python-bugzilla calls. I've deployed the new code to stg and it is working properly. A bug was filed the other day claiming that it was impossible to propose bugs as FE or

Re: Freeze Break Request - Fixing Blocker Proposal in Blockerbugs App

On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 16:35:14 -0700 Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote: On Sep 5, 2013 1:09 PM, Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote: A bug was filed the other day claiming that it was impossible to propose bugs as FE or blockers in the blockerbugs app. I have a fix ready that's already

Re: Freeze Break Request - Fixing Blocker Proposal in Blockerbugs App

On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 14:22:50 -0600 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: Looks pretty fine, except I would prefer the cookie be under /var than /usr/share. I guess it doesn't matter a ton, but /usr/share is supposed to be for 'read only' resources. kevin blockerbugs-0.3.0.3.2-1.el6 has been

Observed Advantages to using Github?

As I recall, one of the claimed advantages of using github over fedorahosted is the ease with which people can submit code - the idea being that new contributors are more likely to have a github account than a FAS account. I'm curious whether anyone has observed an uptick in external

Re: FAS password on 3rd party pages?

On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:07:25 +0200 Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote: Hi guys, Since you want to push Fedocal and Blocker tracking into production, would you mind to change you login forms, that I don't have to enter my FAS password into your application dialog boxes? Although I

Moving the blocker tracking app to stable

The blocker tracking app [1] has been in staging [2] for a while now and I'd like to move it to production so that we can start proposing blocker and fe bugs via the web interface instead of assuming that everyone understands how the blocker/fe process works. I'd like to get that started this

Re: Moving the blocker tracking app to stable

On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:11:00 -0600 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:06:47 -0600 Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote: The blocker tracking app [1] has been in staging [2] for a while now and I'd like to move it to production so that we can start proposing blocker

Heads Up: Pending Bugzilla Changes

With the new version of bugzilla that is currently deployed on partner-bugzilla, there are some API changes [1] that have prompted changes in python-bugzilla. AFAIK, the updates to python-bugzilla have all been written but there are changes to how the code does updates. I've requested a new build

  1   2   >