Re: Dropping gitolite and breaking stg

2016-02-22 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 11:09:25AM -0500, Ralph Bean wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:14:30PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:51:51AM -0500, Ralph Bean wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:11:09PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > > We could have the

Re: Dropping gitolite and breaking stg

2016-02-20 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Wednesday, February 17, 2016 05:34:12 PM Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > On Wed 17 Feb 2016 04:30:56 PM CET Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:11:09 +0100 > > > > Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > >> Good morning everyone, > > > > ...snip plan to

Re: Dropping gitolite and breaking stg

2016-02-19 Thread Ralph Bean
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:14:30PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:51:51AM -0500, Ralph Bean wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:11:09PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Just as a point of clarification -- there are two systems in play for > > pkgs.fp.o

Re: Dropping gitolite and breaking stg

2016-02-19 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:51:51AM -0500, Ralph Bean wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:11:09PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Just as a point of clarification -- there are two systems in play for > pkgs.fp.o currently: > > - There is 'cgit' which provides the web-based view of the repos. >

Re: Dropping gitolite and breaking stg

2016-02-19 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 01:11:06PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > "PC" == Pierre-Yves Chibon writes: > > PC> For a little while now I have been wondering about dropping gitolite > PC> for pagure. Gitolite has quite a lot of advantages: > > I also want to add

Re: Dropping gitolite and breaking stg

2016-02-17 Thread Garrett Holmstrom
On 2016-02-17 7:30, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:11:09 +0100 Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: One question though, looking at our current setup, we allow people to create their own branch, and not to delete it, right? I am curious if anyone can create a branch on a

Re: Dropping gitolite and breaking stg

2016-02-17 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "PC" == Pierre-Yves Chibon writes: PC> For a little while now I have been wondering about dropping gitolite PC> for pagure. Gitolite has quite a lot of advantages: I also want to add that the developer of gitolite has worked with us pretty closely to develop things

Re: Dropping gitolite and breaking stg

2016-02-17 Thread Ralph Bean
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:11:09PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good morning everyone, Good morning, Pingou. Thanks for writing this up! :) > For a little while now I have been wondering about dropping gitolite for > pagure. > Gitolite has quite a lot of advantages: > - well known > -

Re: Dropping gitolite and breaking stg

2016-02-17 Thread Stanislav Ochotnicky
On Wed 17 Feb 2016 04:30:56 PM CET Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:11:09 +0100 > Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > >> Good morning everyone, > > ...snip plan to switch to async service from gitolite... > >> One question though, looking at our current

Re: Dropping gitolite and breaking stg

2016-02-17 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:11:09 +0100 Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good morning everyone, ...snip plan to switch to async service from gitolite... > One question though, looking at our current setup, we allow people to > create their own branch, and not to delete it, right? >

Dropping gitolite and breaking stg

2016-02-17 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Good morning everyone, For a little while now I have been wondering about dropping gitolite for pagure. Gitolite has quite a lot of advantages: - well known - well documented - very flexible But for pagure's use-case it also has some drawbacks: - perl - "too powerful" Let me explain the later