On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 11:09:25AM -0500, Ralph Bean wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:14:30PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:51:51AM -0500, Ralph Bean wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:11:09PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > > We could have the
On Wednesday, February 17, 2016 05:34:12 PM Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> On Wed 17 Feb 2016 04:30:56 PM CET Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:11:09 +0100
> >
> > Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >> Good morning everyone,
> >
> > ...snip plan to
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:14:30PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:51:51AM -0500, Ralph Bean wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:11:09PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > Just as a point of clarification -- there are two systems in play for
> > pkgs.fp.o
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:51:51AM -0500, Ralph Bean wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:11:09PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Just as a point of clarification -- there are two systems in play for
> pkgs.fp.o currently:
>
> - There is 'cgit' which provides the web-based view of the repos.
>
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 01:11:06PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "PC" == Pierre-Yves Chibon writes:
>
> PC> For a little while now I have been wondering about dropping gitolite
> PC> for pagure. Gitolite has quite a lot of advantages:
>
> I also want to add
On 2016-02-17 7:30, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:11:09 +0100
Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
One question though, looking at our current setup, we allow people to
create their own branch, and not to delete it, right?
I am curious if anyone can create a branch on a
> "PC" == Pierre-Yves Chibon writes:
PC> For a little while now I have been wondering about dropping gitolite
PC> for pagure. Gitolite has quite a lot of advantages:
I also want to add that the developer of gitolite has worked with us
pretty closely to develop things
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:11:09PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good morning everyone,
Good morning, Pingou. Thanks for writing this up! :)
> For a little while now I have been wondering about dropping gitolite for
> pagure.
> Gitolite has quite a lot of advantages:
> - well known
> -
On Wed 17 Feb 2016 04:30:56 PM CET Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:11:09 +0100
> Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
>> Good morning everyone,
>
> ...snip plan to switch to async service from gitolite...
>
>> One question though, looking at our current
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:11:09 +0100
Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good morning everyone,
...snip plan to switch to async service from gitolite...
> One question though, looking at our current setup, we allow people to
> create their own branch, and not to delete it, right?
>
Good morning everyone,
For a little while now I have been wondering about dropping gitolite for pagure.
Gitolite has quite a lot of advantages:
- well known
- well documented
- very flexible
But for pagure's use-case it also has some drawbacks:
- perl
- "too powerful"
Let me explain the later
11 matches
Mail list logo