Re: FBR: Update Pagure, Anitya and Piwik to use secure cipher set

Are the files also moved to the correct template directory or are they there already? If they are there already +1 On 17 March 2017 at 20:07, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > Turns out I'll need a follow-up... > > Can I get +!s to also apply the following to make this actually

Re: FBR: Update Pagure, Anitya and Piwik to use secure cipher set

+1 sorry for not noticing that on the first patch. ;( kevin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: FBR: Update Pagure, Anitya and Piwik to use secure cipher set

Turns out I'll need a follow-up... Can I get +!s to also apply the following to make this actually work? Moved roles/anitya/frontend/files/0_releasemonitoring.conf -> roles/anitya/frontend/templates/0_releasemonitoring.conf Moved roles/piwik/files/piwik-httpd.conf ->

Re: FBR: Update Pagure, Anitya and Piwik to use secure cipher set

+1 here. Please do. kevin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: FBR: Update Pagure, Anitya and Piwik to use secure cipher set

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > Hi, > > Turns out that these three services were not yet using our global > secure cipher set. > This means that they have the Apache defaults, which are quite > insecure (RC4 and no FS). > Can I please get +1s to

FBR: Update Pagure, Anitya and Piwik to use secure cipher set

Hi, Turns out that these three services were not yet using our global secure cipher set. This means that they have the Apache defaults, which are quite insecure (RC4 and no FS). Can I please get +1s to apply the underneath patch? Patrick commit 55183057fc95109df5d6b50258918c59c7930674 Author: