On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 06:38:11PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> +1 I checked the PR and it looks sane to me, also needs to be
> replicated for rawhide so it's not lost.
Yeah, there was another pr for rawhide...
+1 on this.
kevin
--
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 4:14 PM Mohan Boddu wrote:
> >
+1 I checked the PR and it looks sane to me, also needs to be
replicated for rawhide so it's not lost.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 4:14 PM Mohan Boddu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The change https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ARM_Release_Criteria_Changes
> asks for making aarch64 workstation image
Hi,
The change https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ARM_Release_Criteria_Changes
asks for making aarch64 workstation image non-failable and armhfp xfce
image failable.
The patch is available at https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/808/
The recent f32 compose has aarch64 workstation
