On 01/08/2018 03:29 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> Oh yeah, we discussed this. The opt-in is having tests in the right
> place, basically. That seems reasonable.
>
Exactly. Aside from greenwave options, each packager has complete
control over which tests are enabled via the files in the dist-git
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 03:16:34PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Well only packages with tests (and part of Fedora Atomic for now)
> will be gated on test results, nothing will change for the others :)
Oh yeah, we discussed this. The opt-in is having tests in the right
place, basically. That
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 09:04:50AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 08:35:50AM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > The tests run by the Atomic CI pipeline are controlled directly by the
> > > packager:
> > > * Files in dist-git define which tests are run
> > > What do you
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 08:35:50AM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > The tests run by the Atomic CI pipeline are controlled directly by the
> > packager:
> > * Files in dist-git define which tests are run
> > What do you think?
> Has this been to FESCo?
That's probably a good next step.
> > It
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 8:39 PM, Dominik Perpeet wrote:
> Dear Fedora Infra,
>
> it's time to close the CI feedback loop!
>
> We have been working on adding CI to Fedora for a little while now but this
> has not really had a visible effect since there are no consequences when
Dear Fedora Infra,
it's time to close the CI feedback loop!
We have been working on adding CI to Fedora for a little while now but
this has not really had avisibleeffect since there are no consequences
whentests pass or fail.
In order to change this, we plan to enable gating in bodhi.