Re: The Future of the Fedora Layered Image Build System's OpenShift Deployment

2017-06-23 Thread Matthew Miller
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 05:12:32PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote: > There's no real technical reason why it can't be a tenant, OSBS these > days is OpenShift namespace aware. However, from a Fedora Project > standpoint I expect we'll keep OSBS on it's own independent > installation because it's in the

Re: The Future of the Fedora Layered Image Build System's OpenShift Deployment

2017-06-22 Thread Adam Miller
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 02:40:53PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> Yeah, I don't mind. We choose to use RHOSCP for our openshift we setup >> in staging, so I don't see any problem with switching to use this for >> the

Re: The Future of the Fedora Layered Image Build System's OpenShift Deployment

2017-06-21 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:27:58AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 9:09 PM, Adam Miller > wrote: > > Hello all, > > I wanted to bring up the topic of the future of Fedora's Layered > > Image Build System (FLIBS) as it pertains to OpenShift

Re: The Future of the Fedora Layered Image Build System's OpenShift Deployment

2017-06-21 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 9:09 PM, Adam Miller wrote: > Hello all, > I wanted to bring up the topic of the future of Fedora's Layered > Image Build System (FLIBS) as it pertains to OpenShift as a backend > technology that FLIBS is built on top of. > > TL;DR - Does

Re: The Future of the Fedora Layered Image Build System's OpenShift Deployment

2017-06-20 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 02:40:53PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Yeah, I don't mind. We choose to use RHOSCP for our openshift we setup > in staging, so I don't see any problem with switching to use this for > the FLIBS. I know that as is now OSBS requires a special independent installation of

Re: The Future of the Fedora Layered Image Build System's OpenShift Deployment

2017-06-20 Thread Adam Miller
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Yeah, I don't mind. We choose to use RHOSCP for our openshift we setup > in staging, so I don't see any problem with switching to use this for > the FLIBS. > +1 Thanks > Probibly something to do after f26 is out the door

Re: The Future of the Fedora Layered Image Build System's OpenShift Deployment

2017-06-20 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Yeah, I don't mind. We choose to use RHOSCP for our openshift we setup in staging, so I don't see any problem with switching to use this for the FLIBS. Probibly something to do after f26 is out the door tho. kevin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

The Future of the Fedora Layered Image Build System's OpenShift Deployment

2017-06-20 Thread Adam Miller
Hello all, I wanted to bring up the topic of the future of Fedora's Layered Image Build System (FLIBS) as it pertains to OpenShift as a backend technology that FLIBS is built on top of. TL;DR - Does anyone care if we move FLIBS to be run on OpenShift Container Platform instead of OpenShift