On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 05:12:32PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> There's no real technical reason why it can't be a tenant, OSBS these
> days is OpenShift namespace aware. However, from a Fedora Project
> standpoint I expect we'll keep OSBS on it's own independent
> installation because it's in the
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 02:40:53PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> Yeah, I don't mind. We choose to use RHOSCP for our openshift we setup
>> in staging, so I don't see any problem with switching to use this for
>> the
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:27:58AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 9:09 PM, Adam Miller
> wrote:
> > Hello all,
> > I wanted to bring up the topic of the future of Fedora's Layered
> > Image Build System (FLIBS) as it pertains to OpenShift
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 9:09 PM, Adam Miller
wrote:
> Hello all,
> I wanted to bring up the topic of the future of Fedora's Layered
> Image Build System (FLIBS) as it pertains to OpenShift as a backend
> technology that FLIBS is built on top of.
>
> TL;DR - Does
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 02:40:53PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Yeah, I don't mind. We choose to use RHOSCP for our openshift we setup
> in staging, so I don't see any problem with switching to use this for
> the FLIBS.
I know that as is now OSBS requires a special independent installation
of
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Yeah, I don't mind. We choose to use RHOSCP for our openshift we setup
> in staging, so I don't see any problem with switching to use this for
> the FLIBS.
>
+1 Thanks
> Probibly something to do after f26 is out the door
Yeah, I don't mind. We choose to use RHOSCP for our openshift we setup
in staging, so I don't see any problem with switching to use this for
the FLIBS.
Probibly something to do after f26 is out the door tho.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hello all,
I wanted to bring up the topic of the future of Fedora's Layered
Image Build System (FLIBS) as it pertains to OpenShift as a backend
technology that FLIBS is built on top of.
TL;DR - Does anyone care if we move FLIBS to be run on OpenShift
Container Platform instead of OpenShift