Dne 25. 03. 19 v 14:49 Patrick Uiterwijk napsal(a):
> Additionally, I would not call it dead since I took it over, given
> that I've been adding new features to it over time.
> There's not a huge set of new features people have been asking for, so
> I've only been adding what I do hear about or
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 14:17, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 21. 03. 19 v 13:57 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> > Forgive me, but what does sigul do that signd cannot? I'm unaware of
> > any material differences between the two.
Sigul has very strong network isolation against the server and
protections
Dne 21. 03. 19 v 13:57 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> Forgive me, but what does sigul do that signd cannot? I'm unaware of
> any material differences between the two.
When I started Copr I considered both Sigul and OBS signd. I spent several
hours with Mirek Trmač - original author of
Sigul and we
> > > Do we want to port sigul to python3-gpg, switching Sigul to Python 3
> > > and the official gpgme bindings so that it works with GnuPG 2?
> >
> > I would think this would be the way to go, but of course it's up to Patrick.
> >
>
> Is this in progress anywhere?
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 4:28 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On 1/21/19 10:13 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > So, we've got a bit of a problem. The sigul package is not installable
> > in Fedora 29, and pygpgme is half-broken in Fedora 28 and was retired
> > during Fedora 29 development due
On 1/21/19 10:13 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> So, we've got a bit of a problem. The sigul package is not installable
> in Fedora 29, and pygpgme is half-broken in Fedora 28 and was retired
> during Fedora 29 development due to constant breakage.
>
> This means that sigul is in danger of
Hey all,
So, we've got a bit of a problem. The sigul package is not installable
in Fedora 29, and pygpgme is half-broken in Fedora 28 and was retired
during Fedora 29 development due to constant breakage.
This means that sigul is in danger of being retired in Fedora.
Unfortunately, sigul is the
