RE: FAS Mailings

2016-06-07 Thread Corey 'linuxmodder' Sheldon
Can a mailman admin check to see how my old Corey84 gmail is STILL 2 months after disabling all but cla is getting devel / packaging emails as recently as 6/6/16? Also seem to be getting random double emails from infra and Marketing at the email my Current fas is tied to. TIA. Corey

Re: Freeze break: drop notifications bounces

2016-06-07 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 19:08:02 -0400 "Corey 'linuxmodder' Sheldon" wrote: > Sounds logical, but can we have FMN do the disabling too or is that > still a manual thing for the moment? Well, that would be nice, but there's no code for it currently. It would have to

Re: Freeze break request: API break request: FAS to not return inactive accounts

2016-06-07 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 02:43:57PM +, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > Hi, > > Since we currently have to deal with a lot of spam accounts, it would > be very useful for our > systems, like zodbot and FMN, to not retrieve all of those accounts from FAS. > > I have just merged a patch for FAS2 to

Re: Freeze break request: API break request: FAS to not return inactive accounts

2016-06-07 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 14:43:57 + Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > Hi, > > Since we currently have to deal with a lot of spam accounts, it would > be very useful for our > systems, like zodbot and FMN, to not retrieve all of those accounts > from FAS. So, this is just to

Re: Freeze break request: API break request: FAS to not return inactive accounts

2016-06-07 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
+1 please apply On 7 June 2016 at 10:43, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > Hi, > > Since we currently have to deal with a lot of spam accounts, it would > be very useful for our > systems, like zodbot and FMN, to not retrieve all of those accounts from FAS. > > I have just merged

Retrospective Freeze Break Request: Basset update

2016-06-07 Thread Patrick Uiterwijk
Hi, Hereby the official freeze break request. I have applied the following changes and would like +1s retrospective: Updated Basset to 0.8, this adds support for undoing changes to Trac tickets. Thanks, Patrick ___ infrastructure mailing list

Re: FAS Mailings

2016-06-07 Thread Corey 'linuxmodder' Sheldon
On 06/07/2016 10:47 AM, Corey 'linuxmodder' Sheldon wrote: > On 06/07/2016 07:33 AM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Corey 'linuxmodder' Sheldon >> wrote: >>> Can a mailman admin check to see how my old Corey84 gmail is STILL 2 >>> months

Re: Retrospective Freeze Break Request: Basset update

2016-06-07 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
+1 please On 7 June 2016 at 16:48, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > Hi, > > Hereby the official freeze break request. > I have applied the following changes and would like +1s retrospective: > > Updated Basset to 0.8, this adds support for undoing changes to Trac tickets. > >

Freeze Break Request: Allow basset to use up to 6 workers

2016-06-07 Thread Patrick Uiterwijk
Hi, Currently the Nagios config allows Basset to run only exactly 1 worker before it starts complaining, but sometimes I start extra workers to catch up on big queues. Can I get +1s on the following patch to make sure that this is no longer reason for Nagios to start complaining? Patrick

Re: Freeze Break Request: Allow basset to use up to 6 workers

2016-06-07 Thread Kevin Fenzi
+1 here. Less alerts is good. kevin pgpYpTqXxUP7H.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Retrospective Freeze Break Request: Basset update

2016-06-07 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 20:48:44 + Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > Hi, > > Hereby the official freeze break request. > I have applied the following changes and would like +1s retrospective: > > Updated Basset to 0.8, this adds support for undoing changes to Trac > tickets.

Re: Freeze Break Request: Allow basset to use up to 6 workers

2016-06-07 Thread Ricky Elrod
+1 -re On 06/07/2016 06:02 PM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > Hi, > > Currently the Nagios config allows Basset to run only exactly 1 worker > before it starts complaining, but sometimes I start extra workers to catch > up on big queues. > Can I get +1s on the following patch to make sure that this

Re: FAS Mailings

2016-06-07 Thread Patrick Uiterwijk
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Corey 'linuxmodder' Sheldon wrote: > > Can a mailman admin check to see how my old Corey84 gmail is STILL 2 > months after disabling all but cla is getting devel / packaging emails > as recently as 6/6/16? > > Also seem to be getting

Re: FAS Mailings

2016-06-07 Thread Corey 'linuxmodder' Sheldon
On 06/07/2016 07:33 AM, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Corey 'linuxmodder' Sheldon > wrote: >> Can a mailman admin check to see how my old Corey84 gmail is STILL 2 >> months after disabling all but cla is getting devel / packaging emails >>

Freeze break request: API break request: FAS to not return inactive accounts

2016-06-07 Thread Patrick Uiterwijk
Hi, Since we currently have to deal with a lot of spam accounts, it would be very useful for our systems, like zodbot and FMN, to not retrieve all of those accounts from FAS. I have just merged a patch for FAS2 to not return inactive accounts by default, and I would like +1s to push this to

Re: Freeze break request: API break request: FAS to not return inactive accounts

2016-06-07 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
changing to 0 after reading Kevin's reply. On 7 June 2016 at 14:24, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > +1 please apply > > On 7 June 2016 at 10:43, Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Since we currently have to deal with a lot of spam accounts, it would >>

Re: Freeze break request: API break request: FAS to not return inactive accounts

2016-06-07 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 12:24:13PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 14:43:57 + > Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Since we currently have to deal with a lot of spam accounts, it would > > be very useful for our > > systems, like zodbot and FMN,