Re: mdapi in our infrastructure

2015-10-28 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "JLT" == Jason L Tibbitts writes: JLT> I guess this hinges on whether having an _srpm_ with the same name JLT> as one in RHEL would cause an issue for EPEL, even if there's no JLT> conflict with the binary packages. Just confirmed that this isn't an issue, since it's

Re: mdapi in our infrastructure

2015-10-28 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 10:40:56 -0500 Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > "PC" == Pierre-Yves Chibon writes: > > PC> My problem is more for the package in Fedora also present in RHEL, > PC> thus where we only want the python3 version as otherwise we > PC>

Re: mdapi in our infrastructure

2015-10-28 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
Well, crap, I guess I was wrong, or the answer is more complicated. Too bad. - J< ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: mdapi in our infrastructure

2015-10-28 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "PC" == Pierre-Yves Chibon writes: PC> My problem is more for the package in Fedora also present in RHEL, PC> thus where we only want the python3 version as otherwise we PC> conflict. That's where either you don't build the python2 version on RHEL, by using a separate