> Is that too far out?
>
This is fine. ;-)
A.
___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
.
On Aug 12, 2016 4:00 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Greetings.
>
> tflink pushed this change right around freeze, but it's not yet active
> on noc01 (needs a playbook run).
>
> +1s to just push it out? It shouldn't affect anything else.
>
looks good
+1
+1
___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 19:13:29 +0200
Aurelien Bompard wrote:
> Hey people!
>
> As you all know, Mozilla Persona is going down in the next few
> months. I've spent the last weeks since Flock updating the Mailman UI
> code to use a library that will allow us to support
On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 16:51:29 -0500
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I want to update koji on the builders, the new build has a patch that
> stops it bind mounting /dev/ and /selinux into the chroot. It should
> fix the random livemedia builds failing bug
I sure hope it
Hi all,
I want to update koji on the builders, the new build has a patch that stops it
bind mounting /dev/ and /selinux into the chroot. It should fix the random
livemedia builds failing bug
Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:42:22 +0530
Kushal Das wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We want to introduce new Autocloud test cases. This will not require
> change in any configure or package version. But it will create a new
> tarball of testcases for Autocloud which is accessible at [1].
>
> I
Hey people!
As you all know, Mozilla Persona is going down in the next few months. I've
spent the last weeks since Flock updating the Mailman UI code to use a
library that will allow us to support local accounts properly, on top of
external services accounts. I'm currently testing it in staging,
On 22 August 2016 at 02:12, Kushal Das wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We want to introduce new Autocloud test cases. This will not require
> change in any configure or package version. But it will create a new
> tarball of testcases for Autocloud which is accessible at [1].
>
> I would also
Hi,
We want to introduce new Autocloud test cases. This will not require
change in any configure or package version. But it will create a new
tarball of testcases for Autocloud which is accessible at [1].
I would also request to decide if we can keep the tests outside of the
release freeze so
10 matches
Mail list logo