I didn't want to update it since pungi had so many issues with modular support.
Hence I waited this long.
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
+1 makes sense. We likely should have just updated it there for the
other freeze breaks.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
+1
On 22 March 2018 at 16:21, Mohan Boddu wrote:
> We updated pungi on branched and rawhide composer a lot during this freeze,
> here's the list of the FBR and why we updated pungi
>
>
+1
On 22 March 2018 at 15:20, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> From f5934de9f70bc1b31348091bd69279f143f7ef78 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Kevin Fenzi
> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 19:13:23 +
> Subject: [PATCH] Per https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7326 move the power
>
LGTM, +1
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
We updated pungi on branched and rawhide composer a lot during this freeze,
here's the list of the FBR and why we updated pungi
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/TPAIGZ5WNTBLDNHBX47X5SH6S4Q4PB3O/
From f5934de9f70bc1b31348091bd69279f143f7ef78 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kevin Fenzi
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 19:13:23 +
Subject: [PATCH] Per https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7326 move the power
builders oz config to use just 1 cpu for now. There is a bug in nested virt
+1, seems fairly easy to revert if it fails.
-re
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> +1 here.
>
> kevin
>
>
>
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 9:45 AM, Michal Domonkos wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
>> CC'ing fedora-infrastructure, as I think they got lost somewhere along
>> the way.
>
> Oh, thanks. I screwed up (again), this time by
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> CC'ing fedora-infrastructure, as I think they got lost somewhere along
> the way.
Oh, thanks. I screwed up (again), this time by hitting "Reply"
instead of "Reply to all" in gmail (*facepalm*).
> Just to be clear,
CC'ing fedora-infrastructure, as I think they got lost somewhere along
the way.
On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 17:04 +0100, Michal Domonkos wrote:
> Yeah, the level doesn't really matter much. My point was, as long as
> we chunk, some of the data that we will be downloading we will already
> have
On Thu, 2018-03-22 at 11:55 +0200, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> I've got a working zchunk library, complete with some utilities at
> https://github.com/jdieter/zchunk, but I wanted to get some feedback
> before I went much further. It's only dependencies are libcurl and
> (optionally, but very
I've got a working zchunk library, complete with some utilities at
https://github.com/jdieter/zchunk, but I wanted to get some feedback
before I went much further. It's only dependencies are libcurl and
(optionally, but very heavily recommended) libzstd.
There are test files in
13 matches
Mail list logo