Re: FBR: To update pungi on compose-x86-01.phx2.fedoraproject.org to pungi-4.1.22-10.fc27

2018-03-22 Thread Mohan Boddu
I didn't want to update it since pungi had so many issues with modular support. Hence I waited this long. ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: FBR: To update pungi on compose-x86-01.phx2.fedoraproject.org to pungi-4.1.22-10.fc27

2018-03-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
+1 makes sense. We likely should have just updated it there for the other freeze breaks. kevin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

Re: FBR: To update pungi on compose-x86-01.phx2.fedoraproject.org to pungi-4.1.22-10.fc27

2018-03-22 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
+1 On 22 March 2018 at 16:21, Mohan Boddu wrote: > We updated pungi on branched and rawhide composer a lot during this freeze, > here's the list of the FBR and why we updated pungi > >

Re: Freeze Break Request: Change oz.cfg on power builders to just use 1 cpu for now

2018-03-22 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
+1 On 22 March 2018 at 15:20, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > From f5934de9f70bc1b31348091bd69279f143f7ef78 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Kevin Fenzi > Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 19:13:23 + > Subject: [PATCH] Per https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7326 move the power >

Re: Freeze Break Request: Change oz.cfg on power builders to just use 1 cpu for now

2018-03-22 Thread Mohan Boddu
LGTM, +1 ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

FBR: To update pungi on compose-x86-01.phx2.fedoraproject.org to pungi-4.1.22-10.fc27

2018-03-22 Thread Mohan Boddu
We updated pungi on branched and rawhide composer a lot during this freeze, here's the list of the FBR and why we updated pungi https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/TPAIGZ5WNTBLDNHBX47X5SH6S4Q4PB3O/

Freeze Break Request: Change oz.cfg on power builders to just use 1 cpu for now

2018-03-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
From f5934de9f70bc1b31348091bd69279f143f7ef78 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kevin Fenzi Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 19:13:23 + Subject: [PATCH] Per https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7326 move the power builders oz config to use just 1 cpu for now. There is a bug in nested virt

Re: FBR: F28 onwards fedimg needs to parse AtomicHost and Cloud variants separately

2018-03-22 Thread Ricky Elrod
+1, seems fairly easy to revert if it fails. -re On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > +1 here. > > kevin > > > > ___ > infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an

Re: Proposed zchunk file format - V3

2018-03-22 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 9:45 AM, Michal Domonkos wrote: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote: >> CC'ing fedora-infrastructure, as I think they got lost somewhere along >> the way. > > Oh, thanks. I screwed up (again), this time by

Re: Proposed zchunk file format - V3

2018-03-22 Thread Michal Domonkos
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > CC'ing fedora-infrastructure, as I think they got lost somewhere along > the way. Oh, thanks. I screwed up (again), this time by hitting "Reply" instead of "Reply to all" in gmail (*facepalm*). > Just to be clear,

Re: Proposed zchunk file format - V3

2018-03-22 Thread Jonathan Dieter
CC'ing fedora-infrastructure, as I think they got lost somewhere along the way. On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 17:04 +0100, Michal Domonkos wrote: > Yeah, the level doesn't really matter much. My point was, as long as > we chunk, some of the data that we will be downloading we will already > have

Re: Initial pre-alpha version of zchunk available for testing and comments

2018-03-22 Thread Jonathan Dieter
On Thu, 2018-03-22 at 11:55 +0200, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > I've got a working zchunk library, complete with some utilities at > https://github.com/jdieter/zchunk, but I wanted to get some feedback > before I went much further. It's only dependencies are libcurl and > (optionally, but very

Initial pre-alpha version of zchunk available for testing and comments

2018-03-22 Thread Jonathan Dieter
I've got a working zchunk library, complete with some utilities at https://github.com/jdieter/zchunk, but I wanted to get some feedback before I went much further. It's only dependencies are libcurl and (optionally, but very heavily recommended) libzstd. There are test files in