Re: Freeze Break Request: fix bugzilla query limited results in review-stats

That looks like a lot of change for what should be a one-line change. Did some unrelated commit sneak in? - J< ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Mirror Syncing Problem

> "R" == Riseops <" > writes: R> We've been trying to sync using the quick-fedora-mirror script but R> we're getting the error below: - When syncing from R> dl.fedoraproject.org It would be useful to see the non-comment lines from your quick-fedora-mirror configuration file. I suppose it

Re: MirrorManager changes - report_mirror

> "AR" == Adrian Reber writes: AR> The problem is that people are reporting different things than they AR> have. Well quick-fedora-mirror shouldn't be doing that, since it checks in what it mirrors as part of a run. Though I suppose you could incorrectly set the host it reports as. AR>

Re: MirrorManager changes - report_mirror

> "AR" == Adrian Reber writes: AR> I would like to ignore report_mirror results for non-private mirrors AR> in the future. I don't really see why this would have to be done globally unless we're just going to abandon the concept of reporting for public mirrors. Do you have an issue with

Re: [FBR] Hotfix pagure on src.fp.o

> "PC" == Pierre-Yves Chibon writes: PC> In order to fix PC> https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/1078 I would like PC> to manually apply the following change to pagure on src.fp.o: I note that we're still not able to import packages with names containing

Re: State of the Review Server (Fresque)

> "AB" == Aurelien Bompard writes: AB> My questions are: should we drop it? Rework it? How high a priority AB> is it really? Well, I think we would really use... something. The current bugzilla based "experience" is basically a mess we've all learned to work

Re: The future of pkgdb

> "KF" == Kevin Fenzi writes: [Using foo-owner@fp.o as the default owner for bugs] KF> But also disadvantages of people liking to see a name they can point KF> to about the package or know who is cc'ed on the bug. For years I've wondered why we don't do that, honestly. But

Re: New Bodhi beta - please test!

> "PR" == Peter Robinson writes: PR> Any particular features/chages/fixes we should be looking at in PR> particular for this release? Yes, knowing what changes to look for would be great. Also, having a more updated snapshot of the database might be useful. - J<

Re: Fedorahosted and Trac

> "GG" == Grant Gainey writes: GG> The problem isn't editing the wiki once we're on GitHub - it's GG> trying not to lose 8 years of history while getting there in the GG> first place. Extract each version as a separate page, convert to markdown (as well as you can) and

Re: Proposal to mirror Docker images

It would also help to have the following information. The mirrors will need to have this information in order to make informed decisions. (I will also have to make changes to quick-fedora-mirror to accommodate.) 1) How much content will the mirrors need to store? How will this amount change

Re: Builds from git repo with unpacked sources

> "MS" == Michal Sekletar writes: MS> Recently, internally they introduced very nice feature that might be MS> also useful to Fedora packagers. It is the ability to build packages MS> from exploded sources. Packager no longer uploads tarball to MS> lookaside cache and

Re: Code browser for SRPMs

> "KF" == Kevin Fenzi writes: KF> Yeah, we would need to at least temporarily unpack it, which is a KF> lot of cpu and disk space. I thought that there was some service which already unpacked tarballs in the lookaside at the time they were uploaded, for the purpose of

Re: [FREEZE BREAK REQUEST] add rsync module for fedora-live-respins

> "KF" == Kevin Fenzi writes: KF> On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 09:10:46 -0500 KF> Nick Bebout wrote: >> diff --git a/roles/rsyncd/files/rsyncd.conf.download-phx2 >> b/roles/rsyncd/files/rsyncd.conf.download-phx2 index f105959..5f5b35f >> 100644 >> ---

Re: Dropping gitolite and breaking stg

> "PC" == Pierre-Yves Chibon writes: PC> For a little while now I have been wondering about dropping gitolite PC> for pagure. Gitolite has quite a lot of advantages: I also want to add that the developer of gitolite has worked with us pretty closely to develop things

Re: CSI vars patch for buildaarch64

> "ZV" == Zach Villers writes: ZV> +csi_purpose: Koji service employees a set ZV> of virtual machines to build packages for the Fedora project. This ZV> group builds packages for aarch64 architecture. FYI, "employs", not "employees". - J<

Re: mdapi in our infrastructure

> "JLT" == Jason L Tibbitts writes: JLT> I guess this hinges on whether having an _srpm_ with the same name JLT> as one in RHEL would cause an issue for EPEL, even if there's no JLT> conflict with the binary packages. Just confirmed that this isn't an issue, since it's

Re: mdapi in our infrastructure

Well, crap, I guess I was wrong, or the answer is more complicated. Too bad. - J< ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: mdapi in our infrastructure

> "PC" == Pierre-Yves Chibon writes: PC> My problem is more for the package in Fedora also present in RHEL, PC> thus where we only want the python3 version as otherwise we PC> conflict. That's where either you don't build the python2 version on RHEL, by using a separate

Re: About MirrorManager2

NC == Nick Coghlan ncogh...@redhat.com writes: NC In that general vein, an interesting project Robert Collins NC introduced me to last year is his lmirror work: NC https://pypi.python.org/pypi/lmirror That is quite interesting. It's obvious that rsync is kind of breaking down, given that with

Re: Updated usage needed for process-git-requests script

PN == Parag Nemade pnem...@redhat.com writes: PN Another question, anyone can reply, why only one person is given PN this work? That isn't the case. For me, one problem is that generally when I check there aren't any requests to process, because limb takes care of them so quickly most of the

Re: Updated usage needed for process-git-requests script

PN == Parag Nemade pnem...@redhat.com writes: PN In simple words no human is required for processing this request. Absolutely, categorically untrue. There are cases when it's OK. Even outside of simple sanity checking, there are plenty more cases when it's not. Some of those cases (say,

Re: Updated usage needed for process-git-requests script

PN == Parag Nemade pnem...@redhat.com writes: PN I have seen after discussing with few members of sysadmin-cvs PN group that they found script process-git-requests[1] is not working PN for them and believe only limb knows how to run it. That's quite a mischaracterization. You asked if I

Re: Updated usage needed for process-git-requests script

KF == Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com writes: KF This is the wrong location. We should delete it from there. So that was my problem. It wasn't some systematic failure; I just needed to get a fresh checkout from the proper location. - J ___

Re: Gitolite3 on pkgs01.stg

PC == Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr writes: PC Currently, the people that have shell access to pkgs01.stg, we PC currently cannot do a simple ssh pkgs01.stg... Ouch. I guess everything is going over the console now? PC Hopefully, we'll be able to fix this. sshd listening on a

Re: people ssh Banner

KF == Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com writes: KF Sadly that won't work. The only people who have accounts are those KF in cla_done + 1 group. So, the people without that don't even have KF an account, so they can't authenticate. ;( Is it possible to give them accounts that have no permission to do

Re: people ssh Banner

SJS == Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com writes: SJS In this case that would be close to a hundred thousand accounts SJS linked to /bin/noshellforyou for the 3200 that are cla+1. Just stating a solution. It would actually work, after all. Whether it's worth the annoyance and any potential

Freeze break request

Please forgive me if this isn't the right format for this request; it's been a long time since I've done one of these. I need to push the following change to the review-stats code through puppet: diff --git a/modules/review-stats/files/review-stats.py

Re: Freeze break request

FYI, all this does is submit several smaller lists of tickets to a query. Currently I need to get the open/closed status of 519 tickets; passing a list of 500 to bugzilla used to work but no longer does. Passing 100 seems to work, but still takes ages. Pretty sure I can do it better but I wanted

Re: Freeze break request

SJS == Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com writes: SJS I would say drop it down to 50 for the moment. I can do that; I just picked 100 because I found that 250 was low enough for things to work so I halved it to add some headroom. If setting it to 20% of what works is enough to get me a +1

Re: Freeze break for post-update hook on pkgs01?

RB == Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com writes: RB 1) Run git check-perms /srv/git/rpms --check=post-update --fix RB on pkgs01 again to fix the handful of repos that are out of sync. I wouldn't have realized that we were frozen in such a way as to prevent this kind of thing. I'd +1 myself but I'm

Re: Freeze break for post-update hook on pkgs01?

KF == Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com writes: KF Yeah, we are in pre-alpha freeze. See: KF https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/browser/architecture/Environments.png KF pkgs01 (where this change would need to happen) is under the freeze. But that's precisely my confusion. If we can't

Proper setting for smtp_from in new trac instance?

Perhaps I missed it but I didn't see any kind of guide to setting up a new fedorahosted trac instance so I copied from one other trac where I have privileges. That trac has smtp_from set to t...@fedorahosted.org. The problem with this is that some hosts appear to do SMTP callouts and reject

Re: RFE: change meetbot log layout (or add an alternate)

MM == Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com writes: MM http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/ MM It's not very well advertised. What magic gets a meeting into that list? Because I can't seem to find any of the FPC meetings there. I assume there's some bot incantation that does it which we're not

Fix to /usr/local/bin/setup_git_package on pkgs

This one-character typo seems to be preventing commit mail from being sent for all newly-created packages. I've fixed a couple already, but: $ ls /srv/git/rpms/*/hooks/post.receive|wc -l 92 so I've more to fix. Not sure if I need +1s to make those changes, but I do need +1s to push the

Re: [PATCH/RFC] viewvc: Add a note that CVS is read-only

Not being in the right group to give plusses to anything, I do have a question: is it in general OK for a puppet-managed file to overwrite an rpm-managed file in this manner? viewvc does not seem to have a mechanism for files in some config-friendly location to override the ones in /usr/share.

Re: [PATCH] neuter viewvc on cvs.fedoraproject.org

Does anyone still keep anything in the cvs/fedora repository? I did until recently, but my stuff has all moved into the infrastructure git repo. There is plenty of old stuff there that we probably wouldn't want to just delete, but I don't see why it would need to exposed via viewvc. - J

Re: outgoing port block on fedorapeople.org

JvM == Jeroen van Meeuwen kana...@kanarip.com writes: JvM Is any outbound NEW connection supposed to be used from JvM fedorapeople.org accept maybe for a few named sockets on trusted JvM remote hosts? Well, some might think it reasonable to pull content to fedorapeople (wget, scp run on