> "JLT" == Jason L Tibbitts writes:
JLT> I guess this hinges on whether having an _srpm_ with the same name
JLT> as one in RHEL would cause an issue for EPEL, even if there's no
JLT> conflict with the binary packages.
Just confirmed that this isn't an issue, since it's
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 10:40:56 -0500
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "PC" == Pierre-Yves Chibon writes:
>
> PC> My problem is more for the package in Fedora also present in RHEL,
> PC> thus where we only want the python3 version as otherwise we
> PC>
Well, crap, I guess I was wrong, or the answer is more complicated. Too
bad.
- J<
___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> "PC" == Pierre-Yves Chibon writes:
PC> My problem is more for the package in Fedora also present in RHEL,
PC> thus where we only want the python3 version as otherwise we
PC> conflict.
That's where either you don't build the python2 version on RHEL, by
using a separate