On 11/10/2016 13:17, David Weinehall wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 01:33:27PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Dynamic typing in __I915__ (INTEL_INFO) has and unfortuante consequence that
for every time it is called under a WARN it generates a very
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Oct 2016, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>> Dynamic typing in __I915__ (INTEL_INFO) has and unfortuante consequence that
>> for every time it is called under a WARN it generates a very
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 01:33:27PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin
>
> Dynamic typing in __I915__ (INTEL_INFO) has and unfortuante consequence that
> for every time it is called under a WARN it generates a very verbose string
> placed into the
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 02:39:16PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 05/10/2016 14:01, Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 05 Oct 2016, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >>Dynamic typing in __I915__ (INTEL_INFO) has and unfortuante consequence that
> >>for every time it is called
On 05/10/2016 14:01, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Wed, 05 Oct 2016, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
Dynamic typing in __I915__ (INTEL_INFO) has and unfortuante consequence that
for every time it is called under a WARN it generates a very verbose string
placed into the appropriate
On Wed, 05 Oct 2016, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> Dynamic typing in __I915__ (INTEL_INFO) has and unfortuante consequence that
> for every time it is called under a WARN it generates a very verbose string
> placed into the appropriate .rodata section.
AFAIK the idea all along
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
Dynamic typing in __I915__ (INTEL_INFO) has and unfortuante consequence that
for every time it is called under a WARN it generates a very verbose string
placed into the appropriate .rodata section.
Each instance of that can can several hundred