Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: PSR: Let's rely more on frontbuffer tracking.

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:24:22AM +, Zanoni, Paulo R wrote: > Em Qui, 2015-11-19 às 13:16 +0200, Jani Nikula escreveu: > > On Wed, 18 Nov 2015, "Zanoni, Paulo R" > > wrote: > > > Em Qua, 2015-11-18 às 11:21 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi escreveu: > > > > Cc: Paulo Zanoni

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: PSR: Let's rely more on frontbuffer tracking.

Em Qui, 2015-11-19 às 13:16 +0200, Jani Nikula escreveu: > On Wed, 18 Nov 2015, "Zanoni, Paulo R" > wrote: > > Em Qua, 2015-11-18 às 11:21 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi escreveu: > > > Cc: Paulo Zanoni > > s/Cc/Reviewed-by/ > > I don't think our

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: PSR: Let's rely more on frontbuffer tracking.

On Wed, 18 Nov 2015, "Zanoni, Paulo R" wrote: > Em Qua, 2015-11-18 às 11:21 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi escreveu: >> Cc: Paulo Zanoni > s/Cc/Reviewed-by/ I don't think our patchwork is quite smart enough for that yet, so for future reference, please

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: PSR: Let's rely more on frontbuffer tracking.

The ultimate goal here is to remove the dependency we currently have on audio driver power to get PSR working. Since with audio driver runtime PM disabled the Hardware tracking believes graphics is fully active and prevent PSR Entry, or in other words continuously exit PSR. So, the idea is to

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: PSR: Let's rely more on frontbuffer tracking.

Em Qua, 2015-11-18 às 11:21 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi escreveu: > The ultimate goal here is to remove the dependency we > currently have on audio driver power to get PSR working. > Since with audio driver runtime PM disabled the Hardware tracking > believes graphics is fully active and prevent PSR