Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/31] drm/i915: Send TP1 TP2/3 even when panel claims no NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT.

2015-11-10 Thread Vivi, Rodrigo
On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 12:39 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 05 Nov 2015, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > On the commit 3301d4092106 ("drm/i915: PSR: Fix > > DP_PSR_NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT logic")' > > we already had identified that DP_PSR_NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT > > doesn't mean we

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/31] drm/i915: Send TP1 TP2/3 even when panel claims no NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT.

2015-11-09 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 05 Nov 2015, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On the commit 3301d4092106 ("drm/i915: PSR: Fix DP_PSR_NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT > logic")' > we already had identified that DP_PSR_NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT > doesn't mean we shouldn't send TPS patterns, however we start sending the > minimal TP1

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/31] drm/i915: Send TP1 TP2/3 even when panel claims no NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT.

2015-11-05 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On the commit 3301d4092106 ("drm/i915: PSR: Fix DP_PSR_NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT logic")' we already had identified that DP_PSR_NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT doesn't mean we shouldn't send TPS patterns, however we start sending the minimal TP1 as possible and no TP2. For most of the panels this is ok, but we found a