Op 29-04-2021 om 16:55 schreef Matthew Auld:
> On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 at 11:10, Maarten Lankhorst
> wrote:
>> This will allow us to explicitly pass the ww to pin_pages,
>> when it starts taking it.
>>
>> This allows us to finally kill off the explicit passing of ww
>> by retrieving it from the obj.
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 at 11:10, Maarten Lankhorst
wrote:
>
> This will allow us to explicitly pass the ww to pin_pages,
> when it starts taking it.
>
> This allows us to finally kill off the explicit passing of ww
> by retrieving it from the obj.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Rename 'ret' to ptr, fix
Op 29-04-2021 om 15:28 schreef Matthew Auld:
> On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 at 11:10, Maarten Lankhorst
> wrote:
>> This will allow us to explicitly pass the ww to pin_pages,
>> when it starts taking it.
>>
>> This allows us to finally kill off the explicit passing of ww
>> by retrieving it from the obj.
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 at 11:10, Maarten Lankhorst
wrote:
>
> This will allow us to explicitly pass the ww to pin_pages,
> when it starts taking it.
>
> This allows us to finally kill off the explicit passing of ww
> by retrieving it from the obj.
This seems to contradict the first sentence?
>
>
This will allow us to explicitly pass the ww to pin_pages,
when it starts taking it.
This allows us to finally kill off the explicit passing of ww
by retrieving it from the obj.
Changes since v1:
- Rename 'ret' to ptr, fix error handling of return ptr.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst
---