Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Ensure associated VMAs are inactive when contexts are destroyed

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 05:18:30PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > On 17/11/15 17:56, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 05:24:01PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > >> > >> On 17/11/15 17:08, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:54:50PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Ensure associated VMAs are inactive when contexts are destroyed

On 19/11/15 09:17, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 05:18:30PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 17/11/15 17:56, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 05:24:01PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 17/11/15 17:08, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:54:50PM +,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Ensure associated VMAs are inactive when contexts are destroyed

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 09:42:17AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > On 19/11/15 09:17, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 05:18:30PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > >> > >>On 17/11/15 17:56, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >>>On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 05:24:01PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Ensure associated VMAs are inactive when contexts are destroyed

Hi, On 19/11/15 12:13, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 09:42:17AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 19/11/15 09:17, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 05:18:30PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 17/11/15 17:56, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 05:24:01PM

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Ensure associated VMAs are inactive when contexts are destroyed

On 17/11/15 17:56, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 05:24:01PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: >> >> On 17/11/15 17:08, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:54:50PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 17/11/15 16:39, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Ensure associated VMAs are inactive when contexts are destroyed

From: Tvrtko Ursulin In the following commit: commit e9f24d5fb7cf3628b195b18ff3ac4e37937ceeae Author: Tvrtko Ursulin Date: Mon Oct 5 13:26:36 2015 +0100 drm/i915: Clean up associated VMAs on context destruction I added

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Ensure associated VMAs are inactive when contexts are destroyed

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:27:12PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > From: Tvrtko Ursulin > > In the following commit: > > commit e9f24d5fb7cf3628b195b18ff3ac4e37937ceeae > Author: Tvrtko Ursulin > Date: Mon Oct 5 13:26:36 2015

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Ensure associated VMAs are inactive when contexts are destroyed

On 17/11/15 17:24, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 17/11/15 17:08, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:54:50PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 17/11/15 16:39, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:27:12PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: From: Tvrtko Ursulin

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Ensure associated VMAs are inactive when contexts are destroyed

On 17/11/15 16:39, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:27:12PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: From: Tvrtko Ursulin In the following commit: commit e9f24d5fb7cf3628b195b18ff3ac4e37937ceeae Author: Tvrtko Ursulin

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Ensure associated VMAs are inactive when contexts are destroyed

On 17/11/15 17:08, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:54:50PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 17/11/15 16:39, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:27:12PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: From: Tvrtko Ursulin In the following commit:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Ensure associated VMAs are inactive when contexts are destroyed

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:54:50PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > On 17/11/15 16:39, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:27:12PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > >>From: Tvrtko Ursulin > >> > >>In the following commit: > >> > >> commit

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Ensure associated VMAs are inactive when contexts are destroyed

On 17/11/15 17:32, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 17/11/15 17:24, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 17/11/15 17:08, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:54:50PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: On 17/11/15 16:39, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:27:12PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Ensure associated VMAs are inactive when contexts are destroyed

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 05:24:01PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > On 17/11/15 17:08, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:54:50PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > >> > >>On 17/11/15 16:39, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >>>On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:27:12PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: >