Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 0/4] Handle dma fences in dirtyfb ioctl

2023-09-04 Thread Hogander, Jouni
On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 14:09 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 12:34:56PM +0300, Jouni Högander wrote: > > Currently i915 dirtyfb ioctl is not taking dma fences into > > account. This works with features like FBC, PSR, DRRS because our > > gem > > code is triggering flush again

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 0/4] Handle dma fences in dirtyfb ioctl

2023-09-01 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 12:34:56PM +0300, Jouni Högander wrote: > Currently i915 dirtyfb ioctl is not taking dma fences into > account. This works with features like FBC, PSR, DRRS because our gem > code is triggering flush again when rendering completes. We are > targeting in getting rid of

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 0/4] Handle dma fences in dirtyfb ioctl

2023-09-01 Thread Jouni Högander
Currently i915 dirtyfb ioctl is not taking dma fences into account. This works with features like FBC, PSR, DRRS because our gem code is triggering flush again when rendering completes. We are targeting in getting rid of frontbuffer tracking code: Flusing hook from gem code will be removed as