Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 0/8] PCI/VGA: introduce is_boot_device function callback to vga_client_register

Hi On 2023/6/22 06:11, Lyude Paul wrote: For the nouveau bits: Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul Thanks a lot On Tue, 2023-06-13 at 03:25 +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote: From: Sui Jingfeng The vga_is_firmware_default() function is arch-dependent, it's probably wrong if we simply remove the arch guard.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 0/8] PCI/VGA: introduce is_boot_device function callback to vga_client_register

For the nouveau bits: Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul On Tue, 2023-06-13 at 03:25 +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote: > From: Sui Jingfeng > > The vga_is_firmware_default() function is arch-dependent, it's probably > wrong if we simply remove the arch guard. As the VRAM BAR which contains > firmware

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 0/8] PCI/VGA: introduce is_boot_device function callback to vga_client_register

The vga_is_firmware_default() function is arch-dependent, it's probably wrong if we simply remove the arch guard. As the VRAM BAR which contains firmware framebuffer may move, while the lfb_base and lfb_size members of the screen_info does not change accordingly. In short, it should take the

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 0/8] PCI/VGA: introduce is_boot_device function callback to vga_client_register

From: Sui Jingfeng The vga_is_firmware_default() function is arch-dependent, it's probably wrong if we simply remove the arch guard. As the VRAM BAR which contains firmware framebuffer may move, while the lfb_base and lfb_size members of the screen_info does not change accordingly. In short, it