On Wed, 18 Nov 2015, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 12:31:36AM +, Damien Lespiau wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've added a feature to sort the patches sent to intel-gfx into 3
>> buckets: i915, intel-gpu-tools and libdrm. This sorting relies on
>> tagging patches,
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 12:44:07PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 12:31:36AM +, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I've added a feature to sort the patches sent to intel-gfx into 3
> >> buckets:
On Thu, 19 Nov 2015, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 12:44:07PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> > On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 12:31:36AM +, Damien Lespiau wrote:
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> I've
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] i-g-t/libdrm email tagging & patchwork
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 12:44:07PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015, Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 12:31:36AM +, Damien Les
2015-11-18 8:56 GMT-02:00 Daniel Vetter :
> On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 12:31:36AM +, Damien Lespiau wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've added a feature to sort the patches sent to intel-gfx into 3
>> buckets: i915, intel-gpu-tools and libdrm. This sorting relies on
>> tagging patches,
On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 12:31:36AM +, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've added a feature to sort the patches sent to intel-gfx into 3
> buckets: i915, intel-gpu-tools and libdrm. This sorting relies on
> tagging patches, using the subject prefixes (which is what most people
> do already
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 10:45:14AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Nov 2015, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> > There are two new patchwork projects then:
> >
> > http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/project/intel-gpu-tools/
> >
On Mon, 09 Nov 2015, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> That would work for us, but not in the general case (for other
> projects). I was thinking of using some kind of other heuristic, eg.
> (subject, commit message, files touched) with a levenshtein distance on
> text to allow
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 01:21:33PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Nov 2015, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> > That would work for us, but not in the general case (for other
> > projects). I was thinking of using some kind of other heuristic, eg.
> > (subject, commit
On Sun, 08 Nov 2015, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> There are two new patchwork projects then:
>
> http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/project/intel-gpu-tools/
> http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/project/libdrm-intel/
>
> I've also run the sorting on all the existing patches so
Hi all,
I've added a feature to sort the patches sent to intel-gfx into 3
buckets: i915, intel-gpu-tools and libdrm. This sorting relies on
tagging patches, using the subject prefixes (which is what most people
do already anyway).
- i915 (intel-gfx): catchall project, all mails not matching
11 matches
Mail list logo