[PULL] drm-xe-next-fixes

2024-05-09 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
Hi, Dave & Sima This weeks -next-fixes. Two fixes breifly described below. Driver Changes: - Use ordered WQ for G2H handler. (Matthew Brost) - Use flexible-array rather than zero-sized (Lucas De Marchi) Thanks, Thomas The following changes since commit 3bc8848bb7f7478e6806e4522b06b63f40a53e1e:

[PULL] drm-xe-next-fixes

2024-05-02 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
Dave, Sima This week's small set of fixes for drm-next. drm-xe-next-fixes-2024-05-02: Driver Changes: - Fix for a backmerge going slightly wrong. - An UAF fix - Avoid a WA error on LNL. Thanks, Thomas The following changes since commit 4a56c0ed5aa0bcbe1f5f7d755fb1fe1ebf48ae9c: Merge tag

[PULL] drm-xe-next

2024-04-23 Thread Thomas Hellstrom
Hi, Dave, Sima The main -next 6.10 pull request for the xe driver. I scanned through the patches and tried to provide a somewhat condensed log below. Nothing spectacular in the uAPI changes. Among other things there are some flags that are reinstated now that we have published UMD for them.

[PULL] drm-xe-next-fixes

2024-03-14 Thread Lucas De Marchi
Hi Dave and Sima, Here are the drm-xe fixes for the 6.9 cycle. Just 3 fixes: one trivial fix for error path handling, one to avoid pinning all VMAs in drm_gpuvm_exec_lock() when num_batch_buffer passed to xe_exec is 0 and the other to allow userspace to free userptr while still having bindings.

[PULL] drm-xe-next-fixes

2024-03-04 Thread Lucas De Marchi
Hi Dave and Sima, A few xe fixes for 6.9. drm-xe-next-fixes-2024-03-04: Driver Changes: - Fix kunit link failure with built-in xe - Fix one more 32-bit build failure with ARM compiler - Fix initialization order of topology struct - Cleanup unused fields in struct xe_vm - Fix xe_vm leak when

Re: [PULL] drm-xe-next

2024-02-26 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 10:46:43AM +, Daniel Stone wrote: Hi, On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 at 03:21, Lucas De Marchi wrote: All of this should be fixed by now: dim is used for applying and pushing patches, which has additional checks so that doesn't happen again. Still pending confirmation from

Re: [PULL] drm-xe-next

2024-02-26 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi, On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 at 03:21, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > All of this should be fixed by now: dim is used for applying and pushing > patches, which has additional checks so that doesn't happen again. Still > pending confirmation from Daniel Stone if the git server hooks are ready > in gitlab so

Re: [PULL] drm-xe-next

2024-02-26 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 09:21:00PM -0600, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > Hi Dave and Sima, > > Here's the PR for drm-xe-next for Linux v6.9. It's a big list of > changes, but it contains several fixes for things noticed throughout the > v6.8 cycle after being merged upstream, added to the linux-next,

[PULL] drm-xe-next

2024-02-25 Thread Lucas De Marchi
Hi Dave and Sima, Here's the PR for drm-xe-next for Linux v6.9. It's a big list of changes, but it contains several fixes for things noticed throughout the v6.8 cycle after being merged upstream, added to the linux-next, etc. Approximately 30% are fixes already sent or on its way to v6.8.

[PULL] drm-xe-next-fixes

2024-01-16 Thread Thomas Hellström
Hi Maintainers, Various fixes for the Xe driver, as described below, for -rc1. Thanks, Thomas The following changes since commit 315acff5196f4e2f84a2a2d093000e0c6b0b4d1c: drm/xe: Fix warning on impossible condition (2023-12-26 12:53:26 -0500) are available in the Git repository at: