Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v7 10/12] pps: generators: Add PPS Generator TIO Driver

2024-05-08 Thread D, Lakshmi Sowjanya
> -Original Message- > From: Andy Shevchenko > Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2024 7:23 PM > To: D, Lakshmi Sowjanya > Cc: t...@linutronix.de; jstu...@google.com; giome...@enneenne.com; > cor...@lwn.net; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; x...@kernel.org; > net...@vger.kernel.org;

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v7 01/12] timekeeping: Add base clock properties in clocksource structure

2024-05-08 Thread D, Lakshmi Sowjanya
> -Original Message- > From: Peter Hilber > Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2024 7:58 PM > To: D, Lakshmi Sowjanya ; > t...@linutronix.de; jstu...@google.com; giome...@enneenne.com; > cor...@lwn.net; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org > Cc: x...@kernel.org; net...@vger.kernel.org;

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net: intel: Use *-y instead of *-objs in Makefile

2024-05-08 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 11:23:39AM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote: > On 5/8/2024 11:00 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: ... > FWIW I applied v1 and v2, and got only the following range-diff: > This matches the changes described w.r.t ordering, and everything built > properly when I tested it on my test

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net: intel: Use *-y instead of *-objs in Makefile

2024-05-08 Thread Jacob Keller
On 5/8/2024 11:00 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > *-objs suffix is reserved rather for (user-space) host programs while > usually *-y suffix is used for kernel drivers (although *-objs works > for that purpose for now). > > Let's correct the old usages of *-objs in Makefiles. > > Reviewed-by:

[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net] ice: fix accounting if a VLAN already exists

2024-05-08 Thread Jacob Keller
return 0; + return err; } /** --- base-commit: 02754103e1f75761066bd45d467b41ab5ad725e5 change-id: 20240508-e810-live-migration-jk-fix-vsi-vlan-counting-402c6d262e26 Best regards, -- Jacob Keller

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] net: intel: Use *-y instead of *-objs in Makefile

2024-05-08 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 10:58:37AM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote: > On 5/8/2024 7:42 AM, Loktionov, Aleksandr wrote: > >> From: Alexander Lobakin > >> Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 16:39:21 +0200 > >>> From: Andy Shevchenko > >>> Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 17:25:31 +0300 > On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 03:35:26PM

[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net: intel: Use *-y instead of *-objs in Makefile

2024-05-08 Thread Andy Shevchenko
*-objs suffix is reserved rather for (user-space) host programs while usually *-y suffix is used for kernel drivers (although *-objs works for that purpose for now). Let's correct the old usages of *-objs in Makefiles. Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov Reviewed-by: Alexander Lobakin

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] net: intel: Use *-y instead of *-objs in Makefile

2024-05-08 Thread Jacob Keller
On 5/8/2024 7:42 AM, Loktionov, Aleksandr wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Intel-wired-lan On >> Behalf Of Alexander Lobakin >> Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2024 4:40 PM >> To: Andy Shevchenko >> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov ; Jesper Dangaard Brouer >> ; Daniel Borkmann ; >>

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] net: intel: Use *-y instead of *-objs in Makefile

2024-05-08 Thread Andy Shevchenko
el-Use-y-instead-of-objs-in-Makefile/20240508-212446 > base: net-next/main > patch link: > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240508132315.1121086-1-andriy.shevchenko%40linux.intel.com > patch subject: [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] net: intel: Use *-y instead of *-objs > in Makefile >

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] net: intel: Use *-y instead of *-objs in Makefile

2024-05-08 Thread kernel test robot
Hi Andy, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on net-next/main] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Andy-Shevchenko/net-intel-Use-y-instead-of-objs-in-Makefile/20240508-212446 base: net-next/main patch link: https

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v2] ice: Fix package download algorithm

2024-05-08 Thread Pucha, HimasekharX Reddy
> -Original Message- > From: Intel-wired-lan On Behalf Of Paul > Greenwalt > Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2024 2:30 AM > To: intel-wired-...@lists.osuosl.org > Cc: Nowlin, Dan ; Greenwalt, Paul > ; Kitszel, Przemyslaw > Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v2] ice: Fix package

[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2] e1000e: move force SMBUS near the end of enable_ulp function

2024-05-08 Thread Hui Wang
The commit 861e8086029e ("e1000e: move force SMBUS from enable ulp function to avoid PHY loss issue") introduces a regression on CH_MTP_I219_LM18 (PCIID: 0x8086550A). Without the referred commit, the ethernet works well after suspend and resume, but after applying the commit, the ethernet couldn't

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2] ice: Fix enabling SR-IOV with Xen

2024-05-08 Thread Sergey Temerkhanov
This patch makes sense since VFs need to be assigned resources (especially MSI-X interrupt count) before making these VFs visible, so that the kernel PCI enumeration code reads correct MSI-X interrupt count for the VFs. Regards, Sergey

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] net: intel: Use *-y instead of *-objs in Makefile

2024-05-08 Thread Loktionov, Aleksandr
> -Original Message- > From: Intel-wired-lan On > Behalf Of Alexander Lobakin > Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2024 4:40 PM > To: Andy Shevchenko > Cc: Alexei Starovoitov ; Jesper Dangaard Brouer > ; Daniel Borkmann ; > net...@vger.kernel.org; Richard Cochran ; > John Fastabend ; linux- >

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] net: intel: Use *-y instead of *-objs in Makefile

2024-05-08 Thread Alexander Lobakin
From: Alexander Lobakin Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 16:39:21 +0200 > From: Andy Shevchenko > Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 17:25:31 +0300 > >> On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 03:35:26PM +0200, Alexander Lobakin wrote: *-objs suffix is reserved rather for (user-space) host programs while usually *-y suffix

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] net: intel: Use *-y instead of *-objs in Makefile

2024-05-08 Thread Alexander Lobakin
From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 17:25:31 +0300 > On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 03:35:26PM +0200, Alexander Lobakin wrote: >>> *-objs suffix is reserved rather for (user-space) host programs while >>> usually *-y suffix is used for kernel drivers (although *-objs works >>> for that purpose

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] net: intel: Use *-y instead of *-objs in Makefile

2024-05-08 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 03:35:26PM +0200, Alexander Lobakin wrote: > > *-objs suffix is reserved rather for (user-space) host programs while > > usually *-y suffix is used for kernel drivers (although *-objs works > > for that purpose for now). > > > > Let's correct the old usages of *-objs in

[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v3 06/13] mm: page_frag: add '_va' suffix to page_frag API

2024-05-08 Thread Yunsheng Lin
Currently the page_frag API is returning 'virtual address' or 'va' when allocing and expecting 'virtual address' or 'va' as input when freeing. As we are about to support new use cases that the caller need to deal with 'struct page' or need to deal with both 'va' and 'struct page'. In order to

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] net: intel: Use *-y instead of *-objs in Makefile

2024-05-08 Thread Alexander Lobakin
From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 16:23:15 +0300 > *-objs suffix is reserved rather for (user-space) host programs while > usually *-y suffix is used for kernel drivers (although *-objs works > for that purpose for now). > > Let's correct the old usages of *-objs in Makefiles. Wait,

[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] net: intel: Use *-y instead of *-objs in Makefile

2024-05-08 Thread Andy Shevchenko
*-objs suffix is reserved rather for (user-space) host programs while usually *-y suffix is used for kernel drivers (although *-objs works for that purpose for now). Let's correct the old usages of *-objs in Makefiles. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko ---

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next] iavf: flower: validate control flags

2024-05-08 Thread Buvaneswaran, Sujai
> -Original Message- > From: Intel-wired-lan On Behalf Of > Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen > Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2024 8:13 PM > To: intel-wired-...@lists.osuosl.org > Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Eric Dumazet > ; Nguyen, Anthony L > ; Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen ; >

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next] i40e: flower: validate control flags

2024-05-08 Thread Buvaneswaran, Sujai
> -Original Message- > From: Intel-wired-lan On Behalf Of > Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen > Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2024 8:13 PM > To: intel-wired-...@lists.osuosl.org > Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Eric Dumazet > ; Nguyen, Anthony L > ; Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen ; >

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next] iavf: flower: validate control flags

2024-05-08 Thread Buvaneswaran, Sujai
I have tested this patch from ADQ perspective and it is working fine. [root@BP-node3-BINDU ~]# tc filter add dev ens801f0v0 protocol ip parent : prio 1 flower dst_ip 192.168.1.10 ip_proto tcp dst_port 12000 ip_flags frag skip_sw hw_tc 1 RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported We have an

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next] i40e: flower: validate control flags

2024-05-08 Thread Buvaneswaran, Sujai
Hi, I'm able to test this patch on i40e interface from ADQ perspective. Getting 'Not supported' message when tried to configure tc rule with control flags. [root@BP-node3-BINDU ~]# rmmod i40e rmmod: ERROR: Module i40e is in use by: irdma [root@BP-node3-BINDU ~]# modprobe i40e