Le 29/08/2013 07:54, Pierre Joye a écrit :
hi Remi!
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:33 AM, Remi Collet r...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
But we are PHP project members. And we ship an OpenSource software which
is Licensed under the PHP License, a really free License (per FSF
definition).
Ah? I
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.comwrote:
Hi!
I would like to react on Stat's it's-not-our-problem comment in
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63520
I assume by Stat you mean myself, though I'm not the only one who
Yup, sorry for mangling your name, this
2013/8/28 Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com:
Hi!
And while the issue was first reported by Debian, the other
distributions share the same concerns. This is why PHP should consider
this - because the other parts of the eco-system are already going
forward with this.
What we need to
Hi!
Unfortunatelly nobody pointed out that it has to be discussed in the mailing
list in the mentioned bug report. We have stated that we have a problem
with JSON license and we had to solve the problem we had.
I consider the licensing issue as a bug and it's always better to track it
as
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.comwrote:
So if something is a question which needs
discussion, it is proper to raise it to the list, that doesn't mean
automatically it's considered not important or not worth fixing - quite
the contrary, raising it on the
Ondřej Surý wrote:
Well, basically the pecl-json-c is now a default provider of JSON extension
in Debian (and Fedora) and the downstream distributions (Ubuntu, RHEL, ...).
This is an area I've highlighted in the past ... While the PHP distributions
define a 'core' set of modules, I don't know
Hi,
I would like to react on Stat's it's-not-our-problem comment in
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63520
I am very sad to see a core developer take such a passive-aggressive stance
against distributions' problems. My wild guess would be that most of the
users use the PHP in the pre-packaged
On Wed, 2013-08-28 at 08:55 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Hi,
I would like to react on Stat's it's-not-our-problem comment in
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63520
I see Stas' reply as respond to Jordi (seld on php.net). We can discuss
what *we* *will* do, but for arguing about Debian/Ubuntu
Hi!
I would like to react on Stat's it's-not-our-problem comment in
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63520
I assume by Stat you mean myself, though I'm not the only one who
expressed the same sentiment of questioning why this is submitted as a
bug in PHP. Assuming that, below are my thoughts on
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.comwrote:
Hi!
I would like to react on Stat's it's-not-our-problem comment in
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63520
However, given all that, I think the matter would be handled better if,
before taking decisions that can
Hi!
http://marc.info/?l=php-internalsm=136768085009866w=2
This is great but this is not exactly what I'm talking about. There's a
big difference between having an extension that does JSON in PECL and
replacing part of PHP core (and very commonly used part) by something
else. It very well may be
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.comwrote:
Hi!
http://marc.info/?l=php-internalsm=136768085009866w=2
This is great but this is not exactly what I'm talking about. There's a
big difference between having an extension that does JSON in PECL and
replacing
Hi!
And while the issue was first reported by Debian, the other
distributions share the same concerns. This is why PHP should consider
this - because the other parts of the eco-system are already going
forward with this.
What we need to consider this extension as a replacement for core JSON
Stas Malyshev in php.internals (Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:40:06 -0700):
What we need to consider this extension as a replacement for core JSON is:
- explanation of advantages and disadvantages (noting that for most PHP
users weird license is not a significant disadvantage of the
extension) of the change
Le 28/08/2013 23:40, Stas Malyshev a écrit :
Hi!
And while the issue was first reported by Debian, the other
distributions share the same concerns. This is why PHP should consider
this - because the other parts of the eco-system are already going
forward with this.
Yes. This is not a
Le 29/08/2013 00:36, Jan Ehrhardt a écrit :
Stas Malyshev in php.internals (Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:40:06 -0700):
What we need to consider this extension as a replacement for core JSON is:
- explanation of advantages and disadvantages (noting that for most PHP
users weird license is not a
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
I would like to react on Stat's it's-not-our-problem comment in
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63520
I assume by Stat you mean myself,
Change your first name! It is incompatible with most autocomplete out
hi Remi!
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:33 AM, Remi Collet r...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
But we are PHP project members. And we ship an OpenSource software which
is Licensed under the PHP License, a really free License (per FSF
definition).
Ah? I always read that the PHP License is not actually
18 matches
Mail list logo
