Github user ravipesala commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
LGTM @QiangCai I feel it is better to keep in tableproprties as it is not
supposed changed for each load. We can further discuss and raise another PR if
needed, I am merging this now. Thanks
Github user QiangCai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
@ravipesala
In my opinion, it is unnecessary to restrict changing.
The users will keep the range_column as unchanged as possible.
So I only add this option into loading command.
Github user ravipesala commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
@QiangCai we should restrict changing that property from table properties.
I am just explaining about how we can do the compaction on range column
since there are similarities with
Github user QiangCai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
@ravipesala
I agree with you to add it to the table properties.
Even if it becomes the table property, maybe the user also can change it.
right?
Range_column is different from the
Github user ravipesala commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
@QiangCai My question how the user can benefit if he chooses a different
range column for each load. I feel range column should be at the table level
not at the load level.
And regarding
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
Build Success with Spark 2.3.2, Please check CI
http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/carbondataprbuilder2.3/10418/
---
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
Build Success with Spark 2.2.1, Please check CI
http://95.216.28.178:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder1/2377/
---
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
Build Success with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI
http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder2.1/2164/
---
Github user QiangCai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
@ravipesala @kumarvishal09
please review again.
---
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
Build Success with Spark 2.3.2, Please check CI
http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/carbondataprbuilder2.3/10413/
---
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
Build Success with Spark 2.2.1, Please check CI
http://95.216.28.178:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder1/2372/
---
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
Build Success with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI
http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder2.1/2159/
---
Github user QiangCai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
@ravipesala
After the compaction, it will become local_sort.
In my opinion, we can use Range_column to partition the input data.
So it can reduce the scope of sorting during data
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
Build Failed with Spark 2.3.2, Please check CI
http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/carbondataprbuilder2.3/10412/
---
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
Build Failed with Spark 2.2.1, Please check CI
http://95.216.28.178:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder1/2371/
---
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
Build Success with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI
http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder2.1/2158/
---
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
Build Failed with Spark 2.2.1, Please check CI
http://95.216.28.178:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder1/2370/
---
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
Build Failed with Spark 2.3.2, Please check CI
http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/carbondataprbuilder2.3/10411/
---
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
Build Success with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI
http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder2.1/2157/
---
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
Build Failed with Spark 2.3.2, Please check CI
http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/carbondataprbuilder2.3/10407/
---
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
Build Success with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI
http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder2.1/2153/
---
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
Build Failed with Spark 2.2.1, Please check CI
http://95.216.28.178:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder1/2366/
---
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
Build Failed with Spark 2.3.2, Please check CI
http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/carbondataprbuilder2.3/10396/
---
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
Build Failed with Spark 2.2.1, Please check CI
http://95.216.28.178:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder1/2347/
---
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
Build Success with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI
http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder2.1/2141/
---
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
Build Failed with Spark 2.3.2, Please check CI
http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/carbondataprbuilder2.3/10387/
---
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
Build Failed with Spark 2.2.1, Please check CI
http://95.216.28.178:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder1/2339/
---
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
Build Success with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI
http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder2.1/2133/
---
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
Build Failed with Spark 2.2.1, Please check CI
http://95.216.28.178:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder1/2338/
---
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
Build Failed with Spark 2.3.2, Please check CI
http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/carbondataprbuilder2.3/10386/
---
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
Build Failed with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI
http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder2.1/2132/
---
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
Build Failed with Spark 2.3.2, Please check CI
http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/carbondataprbuilder2.3/10377/
---
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
Build Success with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI
http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder2.1/2121/
---
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
Build Failed with Spark 2.2.1, Please check CI
http://95.216.28.178:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder1/2327/
---
Github user ravipesala commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
@QiangCai @jackylk Adding a `RANGE_COLUMN` at each load level does not
create an issue? If user selects different range column for each load how you
are going to compact when you support it
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
Build Failed with Spark 2.3.2, Please check CI
http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/carbondataprbuilder2.3/10359/
---
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
Build Failed with Spark 2.2.1, Please check CI
http://95.216.28.178:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder1/2310/
---
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/2971
Build Success with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI
http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder2.1/2105/
---
38 matches
Mail list logo
