Gyula Fora created FLINK-35414:
--
Summary: Cancel jobs through rest api for last-state upgrades
Key: FLINK-35414
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35414
Project: Flink
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gyula Fora reassigned FLINK-35126:
--
Assignee: Gyula Fora
> Improve checkpoint progress health check config and enable by default
Gyula Fora created FLINK-35292:
--
Summary: Set dummy savepoint path during last-state upgrade
Key: FLINK-35292
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35292
Project: Flink
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17843254#comment-17843254
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-35285:
I think you make a good point here but we have to be a bit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gyula Fora reassigned FLINK-35279:
--
Assignee: Alan Zhang
> Support "last-state" upgrade mode for FlinkSessionJob
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17842607#comment-17842607
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-35192:
Merged b1f4b3f35f907e1f6425ad2401dbf24309e6fb59 to main
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gyula Fora updated FLINK-35192:
---
Fix Version/s: kubernetes-operator-1.9.0
> operator oom
>
>
> Key:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gyula Fora updated FLINK-35192:
---
Summary: Kubernetes operator oom (was: operator oom)
> Kubernetes operator oom
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17842249#comment-17842249
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-35192:
That makes sense [~bgeng777] this would be a good improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gyula Fora reassigned FLINK-35157:
--
Assignee: elon_X
> Sources with watermark alignment get stuck once some subtasks finish
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gyula Fora closed FLINK-34574.
--
Fix Version/s: kubernetes-operator-1.9.0
Resolution: Fixed
merged to main
Gyula Fora created FLINK-35157:
--
Summary: Sources with watermark alignment get stuck once some
subtasks finish
Key: FLINK-35157
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35157
Project: Flink
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-31860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gyula Fora closed FLINK-31860.
--
Fix Version/s: kubernetes-operator-1.9.0
Assignee: Zhou JIANG (was: Jayme Howard)
Gyula Fora created FLINK-35126:
--
Summary: Improve checkpoint progress health check config and
enable by default
Key: FLINK-35126
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35126
Project: Flink
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17837610#comment-17837610
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-35123:
I agree that if the rest api is accessible we could call
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gyula Fora closed FLINK-35108.
--
Fix Version/s: kubernetes-operator-1.9.0
Resolution: Fixed
merged to main
Gyula Fora created FLINK-35108:
--
Summary: Deployment recovery is triggered on terminal jobs after
jm shutdown ttl
Key: FLINK-35108
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35108
Project: Flink
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17836106#comment-17836106
]
Gyula Fora edited comment on FLINK-34704 at 4/11/24 10:41 AM:
--
I agree with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17836107#comment-17836107
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34704:
So restricting the optimisation to the head of the operator
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17836106#comment-17836106
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34704:
I agree with [~pnowojski] here, the currently blocked element
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gyula Fora updated FLINK-34947:
---
Description:
We introduced a logic to scale down the JobManager before the task managers are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gyula Fora updated FLINK-34947:
---
Description:
We introduced a logic to scale down the JobManager before the task managers are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gyula Fora updated FLINK-34947:
---
Summary: Reduce JM scale down timeout (was: Do not scale down JM in Orphan
deletion propagation
Gyula Fora created FLINK-34947:
--
Summary: Do not scale down JM in Orphan deletion propagation and
reduce timeout
Key: FLINK-34947
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34947
Project: Flink
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-32529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17830805#comment-17830805
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-32529:
[~tbnguyen1407] please open a separate Jira ticket for this. If
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17830364#comment-17830364
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34927:
I think this would be great, I won't be able to review the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17829467#comment-17829467
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34907:
similar to the other Jirayou opened this only seems to affect
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gyula Fora closed FLINK-34228.
--
Fix Version/s: 1.20.0
Resolution: Fixed
merged to master
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17828222#comment-17828222
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34728:
That makes sense, however this is more a ticket for Flink core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34726?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17828210#comment-17828210
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34726:
Thanks for the detailed analysis [~Fei Feng] . You are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17826054#comment-17826054
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34655:
[~mxm] I would be hesitant to try to backport these changes to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17825657#comment-17825657
]
Gyula Fora edited comment on FLINK-34655 at 3/12/24 12:12 PM:
--
Also this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17825657#comment-17825657
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34655:
Also this issue is fixed in the Kubernetes-operator package
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gyula Fora updated FLINK-34655:
---
Priority: Major (was: Blocker)
> Autoscaler doesn't work for flink 1.15
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17825656#comment-17825656
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34655:
But the vertex parallelism overrides feature was introduced in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17825655#comment-17825655
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34655:
The bigger issue is that aggregated busy time metrics are not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gyula Fora closed FLINK-34524.
--
Fix Version/s: kubernetes-operator-1.8.0
Resolution: Fixed
merged to main
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-31860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17825414#comment-17825414
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-31860:
I don’t really know how that would be possible but I welcome
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17825380#comment-17825380
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34563:
Copying over my comment from GitHub for completeness:
I have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-31860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17825379#comment-17825379
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-31860:
I am not aware of any solution from the kubernetes / josdk side
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-31860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gyula Fora updated FLINK-31860:
---
Priority: Major (was: Blocker)
> FlinkDeployments never finalize when namespace is deleted
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gyula Fora closed FLINK-34566.
--
Resolution: Fixed
merged to main 726e484c6a9b4121563829bc094b3eebeb8ddcf3
> Flink Kubernetes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gyula Fora updated FLINK-34566:
---
Fix Version/s: kubernetes-operator-1.8.0
> Flink Kubernetes Operator reconciliation parallelism
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34580?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gyula Fora closed FLINK-34580.
--
Resolution: Fixed
merged to main d0ce5349fdf1a611518eba20a169c475ee0b46c5
> Job run via REST erases
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34580?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gyula Fora reassigned FLINK-34580:
--
Assignee: Ferenc Csaky
> Job run via REST erases "pipeline.classpaths" config
>
Gyula Fora created FLINK-34619:
--
Summary: Do not wait for scaling completion in UPGRADE state with
in-place scaling
Key: FLINK-34619
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34619
Project: Flink
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17824297#comment-17824297
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34576:
Ah I see, I thought the issue you linked was a fix for this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17824082#comment-17824082
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34588:
The links in the description don't seem to work :/
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17824041#comment-17824041
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34576:
I am happy to review your PR if you try to bump the version
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17824039#comment-17824039
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34576:
I think what you found could definitely explain the problem, so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17824038#comment-17824038
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34576:
Not sure how to repro this in a test easily, you could try
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17823682#comment-17823682
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34566:
[~Fei Feng] here is the JOSDK side fix, can you please help
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17823613#comment-17823613
]
Gyula Fora edited comment on FLINK-34576 at 3/5/24 1:19 PM:
I am a bit busy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17823613#comment-17823613
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34576:
I am a bit busy at the moment so it will take some time until I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gyula Fora updated FLINK-34576:
---
Description:
The HA mode of flink-kubernetes-operator is being used. When one of the pods of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gyula Fora reassigned FLINK-34566:
--
Assignee: Fei Feng
> Flink Kubernetes Operator reconciliation parallelism setting not work
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17823457#comment-17823457
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34566:
Thanks [~Fei Feng] !
> Flink Kubernetes Operator
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17823433#comment-17823433
]
Gyula Fora edited comment on FLINK-34566 at 3/5/24 6:02 AM:
Thanks for the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17823433#comment-17823433
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34566:
Thanks for the detailed explanation, I missed this part. Sounds
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gyula Fora closed FLINK-34566.
--
Resolution: Not A Problem
I am closing this ticket for now, if you feel that this resolution is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17823169#comment-17823169
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-33992:
It would be great if Flink itself would have a way of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17823168#comment-17823168
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-33992:
For session job submissions the jar generally has to be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17823165#comment-17823165
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34566:
{noformat}
A ThreadPoolExecutor will automatically adjust the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17823166#comment-17823166
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34566:
>From the java docs:
"A ThreadPoolExecutor will automatically
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34566 ]
Gyula Fora deleted comment on FLINK-34566:
was (Author: gyfora):
{noformat}
A ThreadPoolExecutor will automatically adjust the pool size (see getPoolSize)
according to the bounds set by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17823164#comment-17823164
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34566:
Even if the core pool size is 10, the maxpoolsize defines how
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17823163#comment-17823163
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34566:
Looking at this in detail I think it should work as expected.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17823049#comment-17823049
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34566:
You are saying that this is a bug in the JOSDK ?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gyula Fora closed FLINK-34561.
--
Resolution: Not A Problem
This works as expected. CRD and the operator is backward compatible, not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17820991#comment-17820991
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34524:
cc [~mateczagany]
> Scale down JobManager deployment to 0
Gyula Fora created FLINK-34524:
--
Summary: Scale down JobManager deployment to 0 before deletion
Key: FLINK-34524
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34524
Project: Flink
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17820657#comment-17820657
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34451:
I opened a new ticket to track this issue explicitly for the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17820656#comment-17820656
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34518:
cc [~mapohl] [~chesnay]
> Adaptive Scheduler restores from
Gyula Fora created FLINK-34518:
--
Summary: Adaptive Scheduler restores from empty state if JM fails
during restarting state
Key: FLINK-34518
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34518
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17820622#comment-17820622
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34451:
It looks like there is a race condition between handling the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17820604#comment-17820604
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34451:
I took a closer look at this and it also happens with the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17820276#comment-17820276
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34451:
I will definitely try this on Monday , I was just curious if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17820272#comment-17820272
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34451:
To me the logs are not very surprising. The way it is currently
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17820209#comment-17820209
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34451:
That's a good catch, if this is a bug related to adaptive
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17819941#comment-17819941
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-29696:
[~domenicbove] feel free to open a doc improvement PR if you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17819826#comment-17819826
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34451:
Also one thing that occurred to me is that the issue could be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17819810#comment-17819810
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34451:
I tried killing TMs and immediately bumping the restartNonce at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17819807#comment-17819807
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34451:
Hm, so this really seems to be somehow adaptive scheduler
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17819795#comment-17819795
]
Gyula Fora edited comment on FLINK-34451 at 2/22/24 8:12 PM:
-
I did not mean
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17819795#comment-17819795
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34451:
I did not mean to turn off HA but only to reduce the replicas
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17819783#comment-17819783
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34451:
Could this be related to the the Jobmanager HA? Instead of 2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17819567#comment-17819567
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34451:
I am only asking because there have been fixes / improvements
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17819564#comment-17819564
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34451:
Which 1.18 version are you using? I have only tried to repro
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34451 ]
Gyula Fora deleted comment on FLINK-34451:
was (Author: gyfora):
[~alexdchoffer] so, just to confirm:
This issue doesn't occur with Flink 1.18? (even with the adaptive scheduler)
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17819563#comment-17819563
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34451:
[~alexdchoffer] so, just to confirm:
This issue doesn't occur
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gyula Fora closed FLINK-34438.
--
Fix Version/s: kubernetes-operator-1.8.0
Resolution: Fixed
merged to main
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gyula Fora closed FLINK-34213.
--
Fix Version/s: kubernetes-operator-1.8.0
Resolution: Fixed
merged to main
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gyula Fora closed FLINK-34266.
--
Fix Version/s: kubernetes-operator-1.8.0
Resolution: Fixed
merged to main
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gyula Fora reassigned FLINK-33244:
--
Assignee: Zhenqiu Huang
> Not Able To Pass the Configuration On Flink Session
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-28645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gyula Fora reassigned FLINK-28645:
--
Assignee: Zhenqiu Huang
> Clean up logging in FlinkService / Reconciler
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17818126#comment-17818126
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-34451:
Before we can investigate the root cause it would be great to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gyula Fora closed FLINK-34439.
--
Fix Version/s: kubernetes-operator-1.8.0
Resolution: Fixed
merged to main
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gyula Fora reassigned FLINK-34439:
--
Assignee: Mate Czagany
> Move chown operations to COPY commands in Dockerfile
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gyula Fora reassigned FLINK-34438:
--
Assignee: Mate Czagany
> Kubernetes Operator doesn't wait for TaskManager deletion in native
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gyula Fora reassigned FLINK-34213:
--
Assignee: Gyula Fora
> Consider using accumulated busy time instead of busyMsPerSecond
>
1 - 100 of 2983 matches
Mail list logo