[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vasia Kalavri updated FLINK-2411:
-
Assignee: Martin Junghanns
Add basic graph summarization algorithm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644070#comment-14644070
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2405:
---
Github user gyfora commented on the pull
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/936#issuecomment-125505767
Thanks, I will check :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Sachin Goel created FLINK-2417:
--
Summary: Travis build failure on flink-tachyon
Key: FLINK-2417
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2417
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644163#comment-14644163
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2405:
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644176#comment-14644176
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2324:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/936#issuecomment-125503398
I've got one remark before merging.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/937#issuecomment-125532963
The `Checkpointed` variant used to be check in the settings source,
chained and after repartition. That is no longer the case, so we lost the
coverage there.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644156#comment-14644156
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2324:
---
Github user gyfora commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644065#comment-14644065
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2404:
---
Github user mxm commented on the pull
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/943#issuecomment-125507699
Why do we need to serialize the TypeInformation in the first place?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644082#comment-14644082
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2410:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644122#comment-14644122
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2406:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/938#issuecomment-125523242
I think the current code (pre this pull request) does not tolerate missing
barriers. Missing barriers can happen at startup time, when one source took
much longer to
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/937#issuecomment-125525140
The test still tests the Checkpointed interface, and regarding the
partitioned state, since the job is a wordcount, it is very natural to add
partitioned state to test
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/937#issuecomment-125529716
Yes but it has 3 stateful operators
2 of them use non-partitioned operator states and 1 uses the checkpointed
interface. Assertions verify the behaviour.
Now
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/937#issuecomment-125537856
I can rewrite this of course and create new test classes but in any way the
StreamCheckpointingIT case needs to be changed because it was not well designed
in the first
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/942#issuecomment-125504599
Thanks for repeating your experiment isolated without the whole Flink
stack. Here we can clearly see the performance impact of the `Long` auto
unboxing.
I will
Github user aljoscha commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/935#discussion_r35631275
--- Diff:
flink-tests/src/test/scala/org/apache/flink/api/scala/runtime/ScalaSpecialTypesSerializerTest.scala
---
@@ -93,8 +98,11 @@ class
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644151#comment-14644151
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2324:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644152#comment-14644152
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2231:
---
Github user aljoscha commented on a diff in
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/935#issuecomment-125536383
Looks good, any objections to me merging this? I can fix the one comment I
had about using serializer.getLength when I merge it.
---
If your project is set up for it,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644162#comment-14644162
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2231:
---
Github user aljoscha commented on the pull
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/936
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14643995#comment-14643995
]
Vasia Kalavri commented on FLINK-2411:
--
Hi [~mju]!
Thank you for the detailed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644057#comment-14644057
]
Fabian Hueske commented on FLINK-2410:
--
I had exactly the same problem with shipping
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644117#comment-14644117
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2406:
---
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/938#issuecomment-125520977
I tried this pull request on a cluster, because the current code is failing
with the following exception when running it with a checkpoint interval of 1
second and a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644159#comment-14644159
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2324:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the
Github user ffbin closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/932
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644007#comment-14644007
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2391:
---
Github user ffbin closed the pull request
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644059#comment-14644059
]
Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-2410:
-
[~fhueske] is right.
The initial design was
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/936#issuecomment-125505397
I think the way the partitioned field of a `StatefulFunction` is set can be
simplified. Currently this happens with via the partitionByStateKey. This is
not very
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644068#comment-14644068
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2405:
---
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/937#issuecomment-125540030
Alright :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644177#comment-14644177
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2324:
---
Github user gyfora commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14645190#comment-14645190
]
Ankur Chauhan commented on FLINK-1984:
--
I just opened a pull request
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14645267#comment-14645267
]
Sachin Goel commented on FLINK-2404:
Fixed via
Ufuk Celebi created FLINK-2424:
--
Summary: InstantiationUtil.serializeObject(Object) does not close
output stream
Key: FLINK-2424
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2424
Project: Flink
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14645199#comment-14645199
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-1984:
---
Github user uce commented on the pull
Github user mxm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/934#discussion_r35635357
--- Diff:
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/taskmanager/Task.java ---
@@ -309,6 +315,32 @@ public Task(TaskDeploymentDescriptor tdd,
Github user mxm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/934#discussion_r35635351
--- Diff:
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/taskmanager/Task.java ---
@@ -309,6 +315,32 @@ public Task(TaskDeploymentDescriptor tdd,
Github user mxm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/934#discussion_r35635338
--- Diff:
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/taskmanager/Task.java ---
@@ -259,6 +261,10 @@ public Task(TaskDeploymentDescriptor tdd,
Github user mxm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/934#discussion_r35635367
--- Diff:
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/util/SerializedValue.java
---
@@ -57,6 +60,25 @@ public T deserializeValue(ClassLoader loader)
Github user mxm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/934#discussion_r35635383
--- Diff:
flink-runtime/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/runtime/akka/AkkaUtils.scala ---
@@ -421,4 +421,16 @@ object AkkaUtils {
val duration =
Github user mxm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/934#discussion_r35635395
--- Diff:
flink-runtime/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/runtime/jobmanager/JobManager.scala
---
@@ -338,16 +332,51 @@ class JobManager(
// is
Github user mxm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/934#discussion_r35635361
--- Diff:
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/util/SerializedValue.java
---
@@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ public SerializedValue(T value) throws IOException
Github user mxm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/934#discussion_r35635387
--- Diff:
flink-runtime/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/runtime/akka/AkkaUtils.scala ---
@@ -421,4 +421,16 @@ object AkkaUtils {
val duration =
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644353#comment-14644353
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2404:
---
Github user mxm commented on the pull
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/942#issuecomment-125603184
We can add a comment that the new ones are faster on primitives. It is not
possible to deprecate the older ones because they are inherited from the
Accumulator interface
Stephan Ewen created FLINK-2420:
---
Summary: OutputFlush thread in stream writers does not propagate
exceptions
Key: FLINK-2420
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2420
Project: Flink
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/938#issuecomment-125626437
Interesting... I had the same issue on my builds when I rebased on this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ufuk Celebi reassigned FLINK-2412:
--
Assignee: Ufuk Celebi
Index Out of Bounds Exception
-
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/937#issuecomment-125600663
Yes, I have written this above (that's why I replaced it with one using the
partitioned states). But that's not the only problem. If you introduce a
shuffle between two
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/938#issuecomment-125622275
Actually, the failure is not a deadlock. It just seems that the run is so
slow that the test takes more than 5 minutes. The stack trace indicates that
various tasks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644405#comment-14644405
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2406:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the
Piotr Godek created FLINK-2416:
--
Summary: Expose vertex using with the new URL scheme
Key: FLINK-2416
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2416
Project: Flink
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644130#comment-14644130
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2324:
---
Github user StephanEwen commented on the
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/937#issuecomment-125524456
I think we should not change the existing tests but add new ones. The
current `StreamCheckpointingITCase` is there to test the non-partitioned state.
Update:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644170#comment-14644170
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2324:
---
Github user gyfora commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644351#comment-14644351
]
Andra Lungu commented on FLINK-2412:
19:17:33,944 WARN
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644429#comment-14644429
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2406:
---
Github user gyfora commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ufuk Celebi updated FLINK-2412:
---
Fix Version/s: 0.9.1
0.10
Index Out of Bounds Exception
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ufuk Celebi updated FLINK-2412:
---
Component/s: (was: Local Runtime)
Distributed Runtime
Index Out of Bounds
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ufuk Celebi updated FLINK-2412:
---
Affects Version/s: 0.9
Index Out of Bounds Exception
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ufuk Celebi updated FLINK-2412:
---
Priority: Critical (was: Major)
Index Out of Bounds Exception
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644458#comment-14644458
]
Ufuk Celebi commented on FLINK-2412:
Thanks for reporting the issue. Looks like a bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644346#comment-14644346
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2324:
---
Github user gyfora commented on the pull
Stephan Ewen created FLINK-2418:
---
Summary: Add an end-to-end streaming fault tolerance test for the
Checkpointed interface
Key: FLINK-2418
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2418
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/937#issuecomment-125604960
I am adding an IT case to this PR that tests partitioned states
independently.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644368#comment-14644368
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2324:
---
Github user gyfora commented on the pull
Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/942#issuecomment-125604252
No one will actually find out unless they specifically went through the
documentation for these. Most people would only ever see the docs for
Accumulator
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644358#comment-14644358
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2404:
---
Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the
Gyula Fora created FLINK-2419:
-
Summary: DataStream sinks lose key information
Key: FLINK-2419
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2419
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
Stephan Ewen created FLINK-2421:
---
Summary: StreamRecordSerializer incorrectly duplicates and misses
tests
Key: FLINK-2421
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2421
Project: Flink
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Metzger updated FLINK-2422:
--
Labels: starter (was: )
Web client is showing a blank page if Meta refresh is disabled in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644554#comment-14644554
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2105:
---
Github user jkovacs commented on the pull
Github user uce commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/938#issuecomment-125664433
It's the same problem I guess, if you look at this Thread:
```
Custom Source (6/6) daemon prio=10 tid=0x7f96a80c9800 nid=0x112cf
runnable
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644584#comment-14644584
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2422:
---
GitHub user buzdin opened a pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644503#comment-14644503
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-2419:
---
I added a test in my other PR for the sinks.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Metzger reopened FLINK-2419:
---
DataStream sinks lose key information
-
Robert Metzger created FLINK-2422:
-
Summary: Web client is showing a blank page if Meta refresh is
disabled
Key: FLINK-2422
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2422
Project: Flink
Github user gyfora commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/938#issuecomment-125660687
You can observe it on this build for instance:
https://travis-ci.org/gyfora/flink/builds/73018512
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/942#issuecomment-125652591
For the cases, where we add a primitive type on a Long/Int/DoubleCounter,
the optimization will automatically be used.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maximilian Michels updated FLINK-2404:
--
Assignee: Sachin Goel
LongCounters should have an addValue() method for primitive
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644565#comment-14644565
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2406:
---
Github user gyfora commented on the pull
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/946#issuecomment-125665625
Thank you for the contribution.
+1 to merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644585#comment-14644585
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2422:
---
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maximilian Michels resolved FLINK-2404.
---
Resolution: Fixed
LongCounters should have an addValue() method for primitive longs
Github user jkovacs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/907#issuecomment-125657216
Thanks @fhueske and @chiwanpark for the comprehensive review. I have pushed
our updated branch, addressing your comments. @r-pogalz will also contribute a
microbenchmark
GitHub user buzdin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/946
[FLINK-2422] [web client] adding redirect link
- added explicit link in case browser is not redirecting properly
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gyula Fora resolved FLINK-2419.
---
Resolution: Fixed
https://github.com/apache/flink/commit/78fd2146dd00da1130910d9f23f09e2504854ef7
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644487#comment-14644487
]
Robert Metzger edited comment on FLINK-2419 at 7/28/15 2:59 PM:
Github user mxm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/942#issuecomment-125653547
Thanks for the pull request!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644527#comment-14644527
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2404:
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644526#comment-14644526
]
Gyula Fora commented on FLINK-2419:
---
Alright, it's going to be a tricky test due to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644510#comment-14644510
]
Robert Metzger commented on FLINK-2419:
---
Okay, I suspect its this one:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644528#comment-14644528
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2404:
---
Github user mxm commented on the pull
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/942
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14644531#comment-14644531
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2404:
---
Github user sachingoel0101 commented on the
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
