[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20690) Moving table to target rsgroup needs to handle TableStateNotFoundException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16626786#comment-16626786 ] Xu Cang commented on HBASE-20690: - Thanks for your great explanation. [~andrewcheng] non-binding +1 to

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21213) [hbck2] bypass leaves behind state in RegionStates when assign/unassign

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16626773#comment-16626773 ] stack commented on HBASE-21213: --- .006 addresses [~allan163] review changes attribute 'force' name to

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-21213) [hbck2] bypass leaves behind state in RegionStates when assign/unassign

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-21213: -- Attachment: HBASE-21213.branch-2.1.006.patch > [hbck2] bypass leaves behind state in RegionStates when

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20636) Introduce two bloom filter type : ROWPREFIX_FIXED_LENGTH and ROWPREFIX_DELIMITED

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20636?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guangxu Cheng updated HBASE-20636: -- Release Note: Add two bloom filter type : ROWPREFIX_FIXED_LENGTH and ROWPREFIX_DELIMITED 1.

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-20993) [Auth] IPC client fallback to simple auth allowed doesn't work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16626698#comment-16626698 ] Reid Chan edited comment on HBASE-20993 at 9/25/18 3:41 AM: It is a pretty

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-21221) Ineffective assertion in TestFromClientSide3#testMultiRowMutations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HBASE-21221: --- Attachment: 21221.v12.txt > Ineffective assertion in TestFromClientSide3#testMultiRowMutations >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20690) Moving table to target rsgroup needs to handle TableStateNotFoundException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16626704#comment-16626704 ] Guangxu Cheng commented on HBASE-20690: --- Attach 002 patch to move operations in {{preCreateTable}} 

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20690) Moving table to target rsgroup needs to handle TableStateNotFoundException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guangxu Cheng updated HBASE-20690: -- Assignee: Guangxu Cheng Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Moving table to target

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20690) Moving table to target rsgroup needs to handle TableStateNotFoundException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guangxu Cheng updated HBASE-20690: -- Attachment: HBASE-20690.master.002.patch > Moving table to target rsgroup needs to handle

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20690) Moving table to target rsgroup needs to handle TableStateNotFoundException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16626699#comment-16626699 ] Guangxu Cheng commented on HBASE-20690: --- Thanks for your review.[~xucang] # Let's look at the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20993) [Auth] IPC client fallback to simple auth allowed doesn't work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16626698#comment-16626698 ] Reid Chan commented on HBASE-20993: --- It is a pretty useful test, SGTM. May i ask one question about

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21221) Ineffective assertion in TestFromClientSide3#testMultiRowMutations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16626686#comment-16626686 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-21221: --- | (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote ||

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-21208) Bytes#toShort doesn't work without unsafe

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chia-Ping Tsai updated HBASE-21208: --- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Status: Resolved (was: Patch

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21219) Hbase incremental backup fails with null pointer exception

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16626653#comment-16626653 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-21219: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21219) Hbase incremental backup fails with null pointer exception

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16626634#comment-16626634 ] Ted Yu commented on HBASE-21219: {code} 307 LOG.warn("Known hosts (from

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-21219) Hbase incremental backup fails with null pointer exception

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vladimir Rodionov updated HBASE-21219: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Hbase incremental backup fails with null

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-21219) Hbase incremental backup fails with null pointer exception

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vladimir Rodionov updated HBASE-21219: -- Attachment: HBASE-21219-v1.patch > Hbase incremental backup fails with null pointer

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21221) Ineffective assertion in TestFromClientSide3#testMultiRowMutations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16626610#comment-16626610 ] Mingliang Liu commented on HBASE-21221: --- # {code:java} if (!exceptionDuringMutateRows.get()) {

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-21221) Ineffective assertion in TestFromClientSide3#testMultiRowMutations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HBASE-21221: --- Attachment: 21221.v11.txt > Ineffective assertion in TestFromClientSide3#testMultiRowMutations >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21221) Ineffective assertion in TestFromClientSide3#testMultiRowMutations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16626570#comment-16626570 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-21221: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21221) Ineffective assertion in TestFromClientSide3#testMultiRowMutations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16626563#comment-16626563 ] Ted Yu commented on HBASE-21221: bq. the ex in RecordingEndpoint should be safely published The custom

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-21221) Ineffective assertion in TestFromClientSide3#testMultiRowMutations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HBASE-21221: --- Attachment: 21221.v10.txt > Ineffective assertion in TestFromClientSide3#testMultiRowMutations >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21221) Ineffective assertion in TestFromClientSide3#testMultiRowMutations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16626498#comment-16626498 ] Mingliang Liu commented on HBASE-21221: --- [~yuzhih...@gmail.com], the root cause analysis makes

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20940) HStore.cansplit should not allow split to happen if it has references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16626333#comment-16626333 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-20940: FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build PreCommit-PHOENIX-Build #2059 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21217) Revisit the executeProcedure method for open/close region

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16626122#comment-16626122 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-21217: --- | (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote ||

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21208) Bytes#toShort doesn't work without unsafe

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16626115#comment-16626115 ] Chia-Ping Tsai commented on HBASE-21208: v2 will be merged tomorrow if no objections. >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21217) Revisit the executeProcedure method for open/close region

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16626047#comment-16626047 ] stack commented on HBASE-21217: --- Ugh. Just saw this. Thanks lads. > Revisit the executeProcedure method

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-16627) AssignmentManager#isDisabledorDisablingRegionInRIT should check whether table exists

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu resolved HBASE-16627. Resolution: Later > AssignmentManager#isDisabledorDisablingRegionInRIT should check whether table >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-18580) Allow gdb to attach to selected process in docker

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18580?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HBASE-18580: --- Labels: debugger (was: ) > Allow gdb to attach to selected process in docker >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18451) PeriodicMemstoreFlusher should inspect the queue before adding a delayed flush request

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16625924#comment-16625924 ] Mike Drob commented on HBASE-18451: --- {noformat} + LOG.info(getName() + " requesting flush

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-21217) Revisit the executeProcedure method for open/close region

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Duo Zhang updated HBASE-21217: -- Attachment: HBASE-21217-v2.patch > Revisit the executeProcedure method for open/close region >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18451) PeriodicMemstoreFlusher should inspect the queue before adding a delayed flush request

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16625867#comment-16625867 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-18451: +1 for the patch. The compaction queue has the same issue.

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-21223) [amv2] Remove abort_procedure from shell

stack created HBASE-21223: - Summary: [amv2] Remove abort_procedure from shell Key: HBASE-21223 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21223 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21222) [amv2] Closing region on a non-existent server creates STUCK regions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16625816#comment-16625816 ] stack commented on HBASE-21222: --- Yes. A workaround is clearing out the old location. That seems to work.

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21222) [amv2] Closing region on a non-existent server creates STUCK regions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16625812#comment-16625812 ] Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-21222: --- Got it. So we need a tool in HBCK2 to handle this case. > [amv2]

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21222) [amv2] Closing region on a non-existent server creates STUCK regions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16625801#comment-16625801 ] stack commented on HBASE-21222: --- In this case it is because WALs were deleted. Been thinking about this.

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-21193) Retrying Callable doesn't take max retries from current context; uses defaults instead

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack resolved HBASE-21193. --- Resolution: Cannot Reproduce > Retrying Callable doesn't take max retries from current context; uses >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21193) Retrying Callable doesn't take max retries from current context; uses defaults instead

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16625771#comment-16625771 ] stack commented on HBASE-21193: --- Thank you [~xucang] for taking a look. I'm glad the maxattempts is

[jira] [Assigned] (HBASE-21193) Retrying Callable doesn't take max retries from current context; uses defaults instead

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack reassigned HBASE-21193: - Assignee: Xu Cang > Retrying Callable doesn't take max retries from current context; uses > defaults

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21222) [amv2] Closing region on a non-existent server creates STUCK regions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16625769#comment-16625769 ] Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-21222: --- Is this because you delete all the master proc wals? Or it could

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20993) [Auth] IPC client fallback to simple auth allowed doesn't work

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16625584#comment-16625584 ] Sean Busbey commented on HBASE-20993: - bq. Good reminder that we lack a unit test for wire

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18451) PeriodicMemstoreFlusher should inspect the queue before adding a delayed flush request

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16625557#comment-16625557 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-18451: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21193) Retrying Callable doesn't take max retries from current context; uses defaults instead

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16625534#comment-16625534 ] Xu Cang commented on HBASE-21193: -   [~stack] tried a bit I think it's working for me unless I

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20940) HStore.cansplit should not allow split to happen if it has references

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16625533#comment-16625533 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-20940: SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Phoenix-4.x-HBase-1.3 #210 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-21212) Wrong flush time when update flush metric

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16625445#comment-16625445 ] Xu Cang commented on HBASE-21212: - [~allan163] I checked branch-1 code, your fix could be perfectly

[jira] [Assigned] (HBASE-18451) PeriodicMemstoreFlusher should inspect the queue before adding a delayed flush request

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Xu Cang reassigned HBASE-18451: --- Assignee: Xu Cang > PeriodicMemstoreFlusher should inspect the queue before adding a delayed >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-18451) PeriodicMemstoreFlusher should inspect the queue before adding a delayed flush request

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Xu Cang updated HBASE-18451: Attachment: HBASE-18451.branch-1.001.patch HBASE-18451.master.002.patch Status:

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18451) PeriodicMemstoreFlusher should inspect the queue before adding a delayed flush request

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16625428#comment-16625428 ] Xu Cang commented on HBASE-18451: - rebased [~nihed] 's patch and uploaded for both master and branch-1.