[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Xiao Li closed SPARK-10174.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
Close it since the PR has been closed.
> refactor out project, filter, ordering
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Xiao Li closed SPARK-10154.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
Keep it based on the PR discussion
> remove the no-longer-necessary CatalystScan
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-8436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Xiao Li closed SPARK-8436.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
> Inconsistent behavior when converting a Timestamp column to Integer/Long and
> then
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-8436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557282#comment-15557282
]
Xiao Li commented on SPARK-8436:
After reading the PR description, this is not valid now.
> Inconsistent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557281#comment-15557281
]
Yanbo Liang commented on SPARK-17825:
-
Sure. You can definitely contribute on this issue after my PR.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
holdenk closed SPARK-14229.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
I don't think this is really a bug - if you want to save from dataframes there
is the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557248#comment-15557248
]
holdenk commented on SPARK-13585:
-
What is the use case for overwriting the old pyFile? The current scala
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557244#comment-15557244
]
holdenk commented on SPARK-13606:
-
Are you still experiencing this?
> Error from python worker:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557242#comment-15557242
]
holdenk commented on SPARK-13534:
-
For people following along arrow is in the middle of voting on its
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
holdenk closed SPARK-13368.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> PySpark JavaModel fails to extract params from Spark side automatically
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557239#comment-15557239
]
holdenk commented on SPARK-13368:
-
It seems that we don't have this in the example anymore, although
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Xiao Li updated SPARK-9965:
---
Component/s: (was: SQL)
> Scala, Python SQLContext input methods' deprecation statuses do not match
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557235#comment-15557235
]
Xiao Li commented on SPARK-9938:
After reading the PR discussion, I think we can first close it now. If
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Xiao Li closed SPARK-9938.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
> Constant folding in binaryComparison
>
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557230#comment-15557230
]
holdenk commented on SPARK-13303:
-
What about if we added a requirements file? We have one for our dev
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11722?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557226#comment-15557226
]
holdenk commented on SPARK-11722:
-
Is this still an issue you are experiencing and if so do you have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557224#comment-15557224
]
holdenk commented on SPARK-12776:
-
Just re-opening discussion here - the migration to datasets was given
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557222#comment-15557222
]
Xiao Li commented on SPARK-9842:
cc [~tsuresh]
> Push down Spark SQL UDF to datasource UDF
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557219#comment-15557219
]
holdenk commented on SPARK-12100:
-
Just noting related progress in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557217#comment-15557217
]
holdenk commented on SPARK-11874:
-
I think this is not intended to be supported, although I'm not super
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
holdenk closed SPARK-12774.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
In some ways yes avoiding unecessary iteration can be good, but allowing Spark
to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557203#comment-15557203
]
Xiao Li commented on SPARK-9732:
Should we close this?
> remove the unsafe -> safe conversion
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557205#comment-15557205
]
holdenk commented on SPARK-11571:
-
Is there anything you are looking to do with this API? It can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-3600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557195#comment-15557195
]
holdenk commented on SPARK-3600:
Is this something we still want to work on or does `Datasets` make this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-3513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557193#comment-15557193
]
holdenk commented on SPARK-3513:
This seems closely related to SPARK-650 and SPARK-636 as well. Is this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Xiao Li closed SPARK-9764.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Spark SQL uses table metadata inconsistently
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557188#comment-15557188
]
Xiao Li commented on SPARK-9764:
This should be resolved in the latest branch. Please check it. Thanks!
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557188#comment-15557188
]
Xiao Li edited comment on SPARK-9764 at 10/8/16 4:38 AM:
-
This should be resolved
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-3348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557186#comment-15557186
]
holdenk commented on SPARK-3348:
Is there still interest in seeing this happen? Should we ping the dev@
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557184#comment-15557184
]
Xiao Li commented on SPARK-9342:
This should be resolved since Spark 2.0. Please check it. If you still
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Xiao Li resolved SPARK-9342.
Resolution: Fixed
> Spark SQL views don't work
> --
>
> Key:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-3312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
holdenk closed SPARK-3312.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
> Add a groupByKey which returns a special GroupBy object like in pandas
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557181#comment-15557181
]
Lei Wang commented on SPARK-17825:
--
That's good. May I take part in this job?
By the way, are you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-3312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557182#comment-15557182
]
holdenk commented on SPARK-3312:
I'm going to go ahead and close this, now that `Datasets` are here they
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-3132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557178#comment-15557178
]
holdenk commented on SPARK-3132:
Is there any progress on this or would it be ok for me to take a look
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-8957?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Xiao Li closed SPARK-8957.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
Thanks. Close it now
> Backport Hive 1.X support to Branch 1.4
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-2722?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557158#comment-15557158
]
holdenk commented on SPARK-2722:
I think at this point trying to change the escaping of the different
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Reynold Xin closed SPARK-1792.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Missing Spark-Shell Configure Options
> -
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-2032?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557153#comment-15557153
]
holdenk commented on SPARK-2032:
I'm assuming since there hasn't been any activity for awhile [~prashant_]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557149#comment-15557149
]
holdenk commented on SPARK-1865:
So ALS specifically has a work around for this with cleaning up shuffle
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557146#comment-15557146
]
holdenk commented on SPARK-1792:
It feels like we've already got a pretty good mechanism for handling this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Xiao Li closed SPARK-9309.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
Based on the above discussion, it sounds this JIRA is not needed. Close it now
> Support
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yanbo Liang updated SPARK-17825:
Component/s: (was: MLlib)
ML
> Expose log likelihood of EM algorithm in mllib
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557137#comment-15557137
]
Yanbo Liang commented on SPARK-17825:
-
[~is03wlei] This task depends on copying the GaussianMixture
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-8957?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557139#comment-15557139
]
Michael Armbrust commented on SPARK-8957:
-
Yeah, close it.
> Backport Hive 1.X support to Branch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557133#comment-15557133
]
holdenk commented on SPARK-1762:
Is this something we are still interested in? I could see it becoming
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-6802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Xiao Li updated SPARK-6802:
---
Component/s: (was: SQL)
> User Defined Aggregate Function Refactoring
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Xiao Li updated SPARK-9189:
---
Component/s: (was: SQL)
Spark Core
> Takes locality and the sum of partition length into
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Xiao Li closed SPARK-9194.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
> fix case-insensitive bug for aggregation expression which is not
> PartialAggregate
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-8624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Xiao Li resolved SPARK-8624.
Resolution: Won't Fix
> DataFrameReader doesn't respect MERGE_SCHEMA setting for Parquet
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-8957?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557099#comment-15557099
]
Xiao Li commented on SPARK-8957:
Is this still needed? Maybe we should close it?
> Backport Hive 1.X
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557069#comment-15557069
]
holdenk commented on SPARK-10161:
-
That being said - I'm not sure I see the value of this?
> Support
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557068#comment-15557068
]
holdenk commented on SPARK-10161:
-
I think this is an issue accross cluster modes, maybe using IJupyter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557034#comment-15557034
]
Vincent commented on SPARK-17219:
-
[~josephkb] [~srowen] [~timhunter] let me know what I can do to help
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557021#comment-15557021
]
Vincent commented on SPARK-17219:
-
in this PR(https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14858) NaN values are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
holdenk updated SPARK-9487:
---
Labels: starter (was: )
> Use the same num. worker threads in Scala/Python unit tests
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557018#comment-15557018
]
holdenk commented on SPARK-9487:
This will maybe break some tests in the process but it would probably be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15557013#comment-15557013
]
Apache Spark commented on SPARK-17782:
--
User 'koeninger' has created a pull request for this issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-8760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
holdenk closed SPARK-8760.
--
Resolution: Fixed
This is a "partially fixed" but I think fixed is a close enough description. We
don't use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-8757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
holdenk closed SPARK-8757.
--
Resolution: Fixed
All sub issues fixed, and well past 1.5 release.
> Check missing and add user guide for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-8842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15556986#comment-15556986
]
Xiao Li commented on SPARK-8842:
Could you retry it in the latest master branch? Thanks!
> Spark SQL -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15556866#comment-15556866
]
Apache Spark commented on SPARK-11272:
--
User 'ajbozarth' has created a pull request for this issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15556862#comment-15556862
]
yuhao yang commented on SPARK-14503:
Yes, let me just send what I got.
> spark.ml API for FPGrowth
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Apache Spark reassigned SPARK-17819:
Assignee: (was: Apache Spark)
> Specified database in JDBC URL is ignored when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15556857#comment-15556857
]
Apache Spark commented on SPARK-17819:
--
User 'dongjoon-hyun' has created a pull request for this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Apache Spark reassigned SPARK-17819:
Assignee: Apache Spark
> Specified database in JDBC URL is ignored when connecting to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-8719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
holdenk closed SPARK-8719.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
> Adding Python support for 1-sample, 2-sided Kolmogorov Smirnov Test
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-8605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
holdenk updated SPARK-8605:
---
Component/s: (was: PySpark)
Streaming
> Exclude files in StreamingContext.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-8605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15556785#comment-15556785
]
holdenk commented on SPARK-8605:
This is semi-documented (namely only atomic moves are supported), but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-7177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15556780#comment-15556780
]
holdenk commented on SPARK-7177:
I've run into similar challenges when working on Sparkling Pandas.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-7941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15556775#comment-15556775
]
holdenk commented on SPARK-7941:
Are you still experiencing this issue [~cqnguyen] or would it be ok for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-8780?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
holdenk updated SPARK-8780:
---
Labels: starter (was: )
> Move Python doctest code example from models to algorithms
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15556767#comment-15556767
]
Apache Spark commented on SPARK-17647:
--
User 'jodersky' has created a pull request for this issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Apache Spark reassigned SPARK-17647:
Assignee: Apache Spark
> SQL LIKE does not handle backslashes correctly
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Apache Spark reassigned SPARK-17647:
Assignee: (was: Apache Spark)
> SQL LIKE does not handle backslashes correctly
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-8780?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15556763#comment-15556763
]
holdenk commented on SPARK-8780:
Is this something we still want to do? This could be a great starter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-6831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15556758#comment-15556758
]
holdenk commented on SPARK-6831:
Is this something we are planning to do at all? It doesn't seem to have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-6780?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
holdenk closed SPARK-6780.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
Since SPARK-3533 is WON'T FIX this one should be to.
> Add saveAsTextFileByKey method
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-7613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
holdenk closed SPARK-7613.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
I believe this is expected behaviour and the current best practice is simply to
make a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-7638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15556732#comment-15556732
]
holdenk commented on SPARK-7638:
Do we still want to do this or focus on adding PMML export on ML given
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-6174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15556720#comment-15556720
]
holdenk commented on SPARK-6174:
I think Bryan did a good job of this I'd be in favour of closing the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5981?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15556714#comment-15556714
]
holdenk commented on SPARK-5981:
I'm not sure porting the models to Python sounds like a good idea, giving
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-4851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
holdenk resolved SPARK-4851.
Resolution: Fixed
The provided repro now runs (although we need to provide it with the correct
number of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15556680#comment-15556680
]
holdenk commented on SPARK-1425:
Is this still an issue or do we have a repro case for it? The current
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
holdenk closed SPARK-5160.
--
Resolution: Fixed
This is now supported.
> Python module in jars
> -
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Apache Spark reassigned SPARK-17834:
Assignee: Apache Spark (was: Shixiong Zhu)
> Fetch the earliest offsets manually in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Apache Spark reassigned SPARK-17834:
Assignee: Shixiong Zhu (was: Apache Spark)
> Fetch the earliest offsets manually in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15556663#comment-15556663
]
Apache Spark commented on SPARK-17834:
--
User 'zsxwing' has created a pull request for this issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shixiong Zhu updated SPARK-17834:
-
Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Bug)
Parent: SPARK-15406
> Fetch the earliest offsets
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-4488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15556650#comment-15556650
]
holdenk commented on SPARK-4488:
So while the associated PR is closed, we ended up adding the option to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shixiong Zhu updated SPARK-17834:
-
Summary: Fetch the earliest offsets manually in KafkaSource instead of
counting on KafkaConsumer
Shixiong Zhu created SPARK-17834:
Summary: Fetch the initial offsets manually in KafkaSource instead
of counting on KafkaConsumer
Key: SPARK-17834
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17834
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15556645#comment-15556645
]
Reynold Xin commented on SPARK-17626:
-
Thanks - this makes sense (especially the bushy tree part).
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-2999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
holdenk resolved SPARK-2999.
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in b5c51c8df480f1a82a82e4d597d8eea631bffb4e
> Compress all the serialized data
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-8791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Xiao Li resolved SPARK-8791.
Resolution: Fixed
> Make a better hashcode for InternalRow
> --
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-8791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15556603#comment-15556603
]
Xiao Li commented on SPARK-8791:
This sounds have been resolved in the later version. Let me close it now.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-2868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15556582#comment-15556582
]
holdenk commented on SPARK-2868:
Is this something we are still interested in pursuing (cc [~rxin] who did
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-2654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
holdenk resolved SPARK-2654.
Resolution: Fixed
This has been fixed in SPARK-3444 / ae98eec730125c1153dcac9ea941959cc79e4f42
> Leveled
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-8527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15556567#comment-15556567
]
Xiao Li commented on SPARK-8527:
This should have been resolved. Could you retry it in the master branch.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-8527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Xiao Li resolved SPARK-8527.
Resolution: Fixed
> StructType's Factory method does not work in java code
>
1 - 100 of 268 matches
Mail list logo