[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17836606#comment-17836606
]
Tanel Kiis commented on SPARK-47836:
I would be willing to make a PR, but I do not know the right
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17836605#comment-17836605
]
Tanel Kiis commented on SPARK-47836:
{noformat}
QuantileSummaries:Best
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-47836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-47836:
---
Description:
SPARK-29336 caused a severe performance regression.
In practice a partial_aggregate
Tanel Kiis created SPARK-46070:
--
Summary: Precompile regex patterns in SparkDateTimeUtils.getZoneId
Key: SPARK-46070
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-46070
Project: Spark
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-40664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-40664:
---
Description:
Failing unitest:
{code}
test("SPARK-40664: Cache with join, union and renames") {
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-40664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-40664:
---
Description:
Failing unitest:
{code}
test("SPARK-40664: Cache with join, union and renames") {
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-40664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17612881#comment-17612881
]
Tanel Kiis commented on SPARK-40664:
I do not think that https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/35214
Tanel Kiis created SPARK-40664:
--
Summary: Union in query can remove cache from the plan
Key: SPARK-40664
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-40664
Project: Spark
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-38485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17523363#comment-17523363
]
Tanel Kiis commented on SPARK-38485:
Is there then even any point in having non-deterministic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-38485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-38485:
---
Description:
When adding fields to a result of a non-deterministic UDF, that returns a
struct,
Tanel Kiis created SPARK-38485:
--
Summary: Non-deterministic UDF executed multiple times when
combined with withField
Key: SPARK-38485
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-38485
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-38282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17495899#comment-17495899
]
Tanel Kiis commented on SPARK-38282:
[~cloud_fan], any ideas how to improve this?
I could submit a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-38282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-38282:
---
Description:
Spark will duplicate all non-trivial expressions in Window.partitionBy, that
will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-38282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-38282:
---
Description:
{code}
test("SPARK-X: Avoid duplicating complex partitioning expressions") {
Tanel Kiis created SPARK-38282:
--
Summary: Avoid duplicating complex partitioning expressions
Key: SPARK-38282
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-38282
Project: Spark
Issue Type:
Tanel Kiis created SPARK-37538:
--
Summary: Replace single projection Expand with Project
Key: SPARK-37538
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-37538
Project: Spark
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-37487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-37487:
---
Description:
It is best examplified by this new UT in DataFrameCallbackSuite:
{code}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-37487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-37487:
---
Labels: correctness (was: )
> CollectMetrics is executed twice if it is followed by a sort
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-37487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-37487:
---
Summary: CollectMetrics is executed twice if it is followed by a sort
(was: CollectMetrics is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-37487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17450452#comment-17450452
]
Tanel Kiis commented on SPARK-37487:
[~cloud_fan] and [~sarutak], you helped with the last
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-37487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-37487:
---
Description:
It is best examplified by this new UT in DataFrameCallbackSuite:
{code}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-37487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-37487:
---
Description:
It is best examplified by this new UT in DataFrameCallbackSuite:
{code}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-37487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-37487:
---
Description:
It is best examplified by this new UT in DataFrameCallbackSuite:
{code}
Tanel Kiis created SPARK-37487:
--
Summary: CollectMetrics is executed twice if it is followed by an
sort
Key: SPARK-37487
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-37487
Project: Spark
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-36844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17436116#comment-17436116
]
Tanel Kiis commented on SPARK-36844:
Hello,
I also hit this issue a while back and found that, It
Tanel Kiis created SPARK-37074:
--
Summary: Push extra predicates through non-join
Key: SPARK-37074
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-37074
Project: Spark
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-36861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17421334#comment-17421334
]
Tanel Kiis commented on SPARK-36861:
Yes, in 3.1 it is parsed as string. In 3.3 (master) it is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-36861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17420553#comment-17420553
]
Tanel Kiis commented on SPARK-36861:
Sorry, indeed I ran the test on master. Nevermind it then, does
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-36861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17420533#comment-17420533
]
Tanel Kiis commented on SPARK-36861:
If this is expected behaviour, then I would expect there to be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-36861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17420532#comment-17420532
]
Tanel Kiis edited comment on SPARK-36861 at 9/27/21, 7:45 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-36861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17420532#comment-17420532
]
Tanel Kiis commented on SPARK-36861:
[~Gengliang.Wang] I think, that this should be considered as a
Tanel Kiis created SPARK-36861:
--
Summary: Partition columns are overly eagerly parsed as dates
Key: SPARK-36861
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-36861
Project: Spark
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-36496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-36496:
---
Description: The RemoveLiteralFromGroupExpressions rule might not work,
when using the DataFrame
Tanel Kiis created SPARK-36496:
--
Summary: Remove literals from grouping expressions when using the
DataFrame API
Key: SPARK-36496
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-36496
Project: Spark
Tanel Kiis created SPARK-35765:
--
Summary: Distinct aggs are not duplicate sensitive
Key: SPARK-35765
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35765
Project: Spark
Issue Type: Bug
Tanel Kiis created SPARK-35695:
--
Summary: QueryExecutionListener does not see any observed metrics
fired before persist/cache
Key: SPARK-35695
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35695
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-35695:
---
Description:
This example properly fires the event
{code}
spark.range(100)
.observe(
name =
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-35695:
---
Description:
This example properly fires the event
{code}
spark.range(100)
.observe(
name =
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17359849#comment-17359849
]
Tanel Kiis commented on SPARK-35695:
[~cloud_fan] and [~sarutak], you are currently working on a PR
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-35695:
---
Description:
This example properly fires the event
{code}
spark.range(100)
.observe(
name =
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-35695:
---
Description:
This example properly fires the event
{code}
spark.range(100)
.observe(
name =
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-35695:
---
Description:
This example properly fires the event
{code}
spark.range(100)
.observe(
name =
Tanel Kiis created SPARK-35630:
--
Summary: ExpandExec should not introduce unnecessary exchanges
Key: SPARK-35630
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35630
Project: Spark
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17356253#comment-17356253
]
Tanel Kiis commented on SPARK-35296:
Perhaps someone who knows the internals better, ccould help
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-35296:
---
Affects Version/s: 3.2.0
> Dataset.observe fails with an assertion
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis resolved SPARK-34623.
Resolution: Won't Do
> Deduplicate window expressions
> --
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis resolved SPARK-32801.
Resolution: Won't Do
> Make InferFiltersFromConstraints take in account EqualNullSafe
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17338465#comment-17338465
]
Tanel Kiis commented on SPARK-35296:
I finally managed to change the UT in such way, that the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-35296:
---
Attachment: 2021-05-03_18-34.png
> Dataset.observe fails with an assertion
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-35296:
---
Description:
I hit this assertion error when using dataset.observe:
{code}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-35296:
---
Description:
I hit this assertion error when using dataset.observe:
{code}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17338438#comment-17338438
]
Tanel Kiis edited comment on SPARK-35296 at 5/3/21, 3:58 PM:
-
I tried to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17338441#comment-17338441
]
Tanel Kiis commented on SPARK-35296:
[~hvanhovell] The assertion in AggregatingAccumulator is added
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17338438#comment-17338438
]
Tanel Kiis commented on SPARK-35296:
I tried to change an excisting UT to reproduce this:
{code}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-35296:
---
Description:
I hit this assertion error when using dataset.observe:
{code}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-35296:
---
Description:
I hit this assertion error when using dataset.observe:
{code}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-35296:
---
Description:
I hit this assertion error when using dataset.observe:
{code}
{code}
was:
I hit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-35296:
---
Description:
I hit this assertion error when using dataset.observe:
{code}
Tanel Kiis created SPARK-35296:
--
Summary: Dataset.observe fails with an assertion
Key: SPARK-35296
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-35296
Project: Spark
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-34794:
---
Labels: correctness (was: Correctness)
> Nested higher-order functions broken in DSL
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-34794:
---
Affects Version/s: 3.2.0
> Nested higher-order functions broken in DSL
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-34794:
---
Labels: Correctness (was: )
> Nested higher-order functions broken in DSL
>
Tanel Kiis created SPARK-34922:
--
Summary: Use better CBO cost function
Key: SPARK-34922
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34922
Project: Spark
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-34882:
---
Description:
{code:title=group-by.sql}
SELECT
first(DISTINCT a), last(DISTINCT a),
Tanel Kiis created SPARK-34882:
--
Summary: RewriteDistinctAggregates can cause a bug if the
aggregator does not ignore NULLs
Key: SPARK-34882
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34882
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-34876:
---
Affects Version/s: 2.4.7
3.0.2
3.1.1
> Non-nullable
Tanel Kiis created SPARK-34876:
--
Summary: Non-nullable aggregates can return NULL in a correlated
subquery
Key: SPARK-34876
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34876
Project: Spark
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-34876:
---
Description:
Test case in scalar-subquery-select.sql:
{code:title=query}
SELECT t1a,
(SELECT
Tanel Kiis created SPARK-34822:
--
Summary: Update plan stability golden files even if only explain
differs
Key: SPARK-34822
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34822
Project: Spark
Tanel Kiis created SPARK-34812:
--
Summary: RowNumberLike and RankLike should not be nullable
Key: SPARK-34812
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34812
Project: Spark
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17296767#comment-17296767
]
Tanel Kiis commented on SPARK-34623:
I had typo in the PR title, so it did not link up:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-34565:
---
Description: The CollapseWindow optimizer rule can be improved to also
collapse Window nodes, that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-34623:
---
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug)
> Deduplicate window expressions
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17296556#comment-17296556
]
Tanel Kiis commented on SPARK-34644:
UDF with internal state should be marked as non-deterministic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-34623:
---
Description: Remove duplicate window expressions from the Window node
(was: Remove duplicate
Tanel Kiis created SPARK-34623:
--
Summary: Deduplicate window expressions
Key: SPARK-34623
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34623
Project: Spark
Issue Type: Bug
Tanel Kiis created SPARK-34565:
--
Summary: Collapse Window nodes with Project between them
Key: SPARK-34565
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34565
Project: Spark
Issue Type: Bug
Tanel Kiis created SPARK-34141:
--
Summary: ExtractGenerator analyzer should handle lazy projectlists
Key: SPARK-34141
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34141
Project: Spark
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis resolved SPARK-34014.
Resolution: Won't Fix
Can cause performance regression
> Ignore Distinct if it is the right
Tanel Kiis created SPARK-34014:
--
Summary: Ignore Distinct if it is the right child of a left semi
or anti join
Key: SPARK-34014
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-34014
Project: Spark
Tanel Kiis created SPARK-33971:
--
Summary: Eliminate distinct from more aggregates
Key: SPARK-33971
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-33971
Project: Spark
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-33964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-33964:
---
Description:
In several TPCDS queries the CombineUnions rule does not manage to combine
unions,
Tanel Kiis created SPARK-33964:
--
Summary: Combine distinct unions in more cases
Key: SPARK-33964
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-33964
Project: Spark
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-33935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-33935:
---
Issue Type: Bug (was: Improvement)
> Fix CBOs cost function
> ---
>
>
Tanel Kiis created SPARK-33935:
--
Summary: Fix CBOs cost function
Key: SPARK-33935
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-33935
Project: Spark
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-33070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-33070:
---
Summary: Optimizer rules for HigherOrderFunctions (was: Optimizer rules
for collection datatypes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-33070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-33070:
---
Affects Version/s: (was: 3.1.0)
3.2.0
> Optimizer rules for collection
Tanel Kiis created SPARK-33851:
--
Summary: Push partial aggregates bellow exchanges
Key: SPARK-33851
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-33851
Project: Spark
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17247357#comment-17247357
]
Tanel Kiis commented on SPARK-32110:
[~cloud_fan] fixed issue I mentioned in the first comment in
Tanel Kiis created SPARK-33225:
--
Summary: Extract AliasHelper trait
Key: SPARK-33225
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-33225
Project: Spark
Issue Type: Improvement
Tanel Kiis created SPARK-33177:
--
Summary: CollectList and CollectSet should not be nullable
Key: SPARK-33177
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-33177
Project: Spark
Issue Type:
Tanel Kiis created SPARK-33122:
--
Summary: Remove redundant aggregates in the Optimzier
Key: SPARK-33122
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-33122
Project: Spark
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-33070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-33070:
---
Summary: Optimizer rules for collection datatypes and
SimpleHigherOrderFunction (was: Optimizer
Tanel Kiis created SPARK-33070:
--
Summary: Optimizer rules for SimpleHigherOrderFunction
Key: SPARK-33070
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-33070
Project: Spark
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-33070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-33070:
---
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
> Optimizer rules for SimpleHigherOrderFunction
>
Tanel Kiis created SPARK-32995:
--
Summary: CostBasedJoinReorder optimizer rule should be idempotent
Key: SPARK-32995
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32995
Project: Spark
Issue
Tanel Kiis created SPARK-32970:
--
Summary: Reduce the runtime of unit test for SPARK-32019
Key: SPARK-32970
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32970
Project: Spark
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-32928:
---
Labels: correctness (was: CorrectnessBug)
> Non-deterministic expressions should not be reordered
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tanel Kiis updated SPARK-32928:
---
Labels: CorrectnessBug (was: )
> Non-deterministic expressions should not be reordered inside AND
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17199646#comment-17199646
]
Tanel Kiis commented on SPARK-32928:
One more point, where this can manifest is FilterExec
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
