[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-11154) make specificaition spark.yarn.executor.memoryOverhead consistent with typical JVM options

2015-11-11 Thread Thomas Graves (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15000426#comment-15000426 ] Thomas Graves commented on SPARK-11154: --- It seems unnecessary to me to add new configs just to

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-11154) make specificaition spark.yarn.executor.memoryOverhead consistent with typical JVM options

2015-11-11 Thread Sean Owen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15000441#comment-15000441 ] Sean Owen commented on SPARK-11154: --- I think we'd have to make new properties to maintain

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-11154) make specificaition spark.yarn.executor.memoryOverhead consistent with typical JVM options

2015-11-11 Thread Dustin Cote (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15000419#comment-15000419 ] Dustin Cote commented on SPARK-11154: - [~Kitard] I think the naming convention and strategy makes

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-11154) make specificaition spark.yarn.executor.memoryOverhead consistent with typical JVM options

2015-11-11 Thread Thomas Graves (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15000438#comment-15000438 ] Thomas Graves commented on SPARK-11154: --- sorry actually thinking about this more I'm torn. New

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-11154) make specificaition spark.yarn.executor.memoryOverhead consistent with typical JVM options

2015-11-11 Thread Chris Howard (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15001316#comment-15001316 ] Chris Howard commented on SPARK-11154: -- Hi [~tgraves] - this overlaps to a point with

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-11154) make specificaition spark.yarn.executor.memoryOverhead consistent with typical JVM options

2015-11-10 Thread Chris Howard (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=1544#comment-1544 ] Chris Howard commented on SPARK-11154: -- On review it looks like the following conf values need

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-11154) make specificaition spark.yarn.executor.memoryOverhead consistent with typical JVM options

2015-10-25 Thread Sean Owen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14973322#comment-14973322 ] Sean Owen commented on SPARK-11154: --- I think that if this is done at all, it would have to be with a

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-11154) make specificaition spark.yarn.executor.memoryOverhead consistent with typical JVM options

2015-10-16 Thread Sean Owen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14961184#comment-14961184 ] Sean Owen commented on SPARK-11154: --- Should be for all similar properties, not just this one. The twist

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-11154) make specificaition spark.yarn.executor.memoryOverhead consistent with typical JVM options

2015-10-16 Thread Dustin Cote (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-11154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14961195#comment-14961195 ] Dustin Cote commented on SPARK-11154: - That's absolutely a good point. It might be more confusing to