[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-17901) NettyRpcEndpointRef: Error sending message and Caused by: java.util.ConcurrentModificationException

2018-07-11 Thread Harel Ben Attia (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16540155#comment-16540155 ] Harel Ben Attia commented on SPARK-17901: - We're encountering the same issue, with sparkĀ 

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-17901) NettyRpcEndpointRef: Error sending message and Caused by: java.util.ConcurrentModificationException

2018-04-18 Thread zhangzhaolong (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16443449#comment-16443449 ] zhangzhaolong commented on SPARK-17901: --- hi [~srowen], did it reopen on master ? we encountered a

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-17901) NettyRpcEndpointRef: Error sending message and Caused by: java.util.ConcurrentModificationException

2017-11-27 Thread Tobias Wolfertshofer (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16266690#comment-16266690 ] Tobias Wolfertshofer commented on SPARK-17901: -- [~srowen] FWIW we can still reproduce this

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-17901) NettyRpcEndpointRef: Error sending message and Caused by: java.util.ConcurrentModificationException

2017-09-06 Thread Sean Owen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16155727#comment-16155727 ] Sean Owen commented on SPARK-17901: --- Possibly, but I would only reopen if you can reproduce on master.

[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-17901) NettyRpcEndpointRef: Error sending message and Caused by: java.util.ConcurrentModificationException

2017-09-06 Thread Sergei Lebedev (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16155707#comment-16155707 ] Sergei Lebedev commented on SPARK-17901: I think this issue could've been closed by mistake: the