[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16038086#comment-16038086
]
Hyukjin Kwon commented on SPARK-20943:
--
[~canbinzheng], I think (as I see no positive sign just for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16038083#comment-16038083
]
Hyukjin Kwon commented on SPARK-20943:
--
I guess we could resolve the issue in any event whether the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16037998#comment-16037998
]
Saisai Shao commented on SPARK-20943:
-
>From my point, it is not really necessary to just update the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16037987#comment-16037987
]
CanBin Zheng commented on SPARK-20943:
--
[~srowen][~saisai_shao] What's the final conclusion? Should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16034746#comment-16034746
]
CanBin Zheng commented on SPARK-20943:
--
[~saisai_shao] I got you. But I think it's better to change
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16034296#comment-16034296
]
Saisai Shao commented on SPARK-20943:
-
I think the original purpose of comment is to say
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16033988#comment-16033988
]
CanBin Zheng commented on SPARK-20943:
--
Look at there two cases.
//Has Aggregator defined
@Test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-20943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16033016#comment-16033016
]
Saisai Shao commented on SPARK-20943:
-
I don't think the previous comment is incorrect. In the
