[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17151431#comment-17151431
]
Apache Spark commented on SPARK-29358:
--
User 'viirya' has created a pull request for this issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17151349#comment-17151349
]
Syedhamjath commented on SPARK-29358:
-
I also came across same issue, if the data frame does not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17107775#comment-17107775
]
Andreas Neumann commented on SPARK-29358:
-
I would like to put a vote for this feature
* It
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17073951#comment-17073951
]
Michael Armbrust commented on SPARK-29358:
--
Sure, but it is very easy to make this not a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17072300#comment-17072300
]
L. C. Hsieh commented on SPARK-29358:
-
> users might rely on the exception when the schema is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17072294#comment-17072294
]
Hyukjin Kwon commented on SPARK-29358:
--
I am good with adding this behaviour if other committers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17071968#comment-17071968
]
Michael Armbrust commented on SPARK-29358:
--
I think we should reconsider closing this as won't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16948800#comment-16948800
]
Mukul Murthy commented on SPARK-29358:
--
That would be a start to make us not have to do #1, but #2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16948101#comment-16948101
]
Hyukjin Kwon commented on SPARK-29358:
--
{{StructType}} has {{merge}} implementation although it's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16947982#comment-16947982
]
Mukul Murthy commented on SPARK-29358:
--
[~hyukjin.kwon], I disagree that the workaround is pretty
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16946809#comment-16946809
]
Hyukjin Kwon commented on SPARK-29358:
--
Given that workaround is pretty easy, I wouldn't need the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16946069#comment-16946069
]
Mukul Murthy commented on SPARK-29358:
--
I agree that it should not change the current behavior of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16944927#comment-16944927
]
L. C. Hsieh commented on SPARK-29358:
-
And I also concern that it is more far away from SQL union.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16944899#comment-16944899
]
L. C. Hsieh commented on SPARK-29358:
-
My concern is it breaks current behavior of unionByName.
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
