hey there,
I see a lot of emails going on about 3.0, getting ready for Java 1.5 (
I guess enums, generics etc) and discussions about back-compat policy.
I'm curious if there is a kind of a roadmap or a document where I can
get up-to-date with all those targets and especially what we want to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-1407:
Attachment: LUCENE-1407_with_back_compat.patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718773#action_12718773
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1685:
Why not deprecate QueryScorer?
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Jason
Rutherglenjason.rutherg...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes please post feature requests to Sun ;)
I signed up for
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/nio-discuss
Looks like a fun list ;)
But I think in the short term Lucene will have to drop to
native
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 3:50 AM, Simon
Willnauersimon.willna...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm curious if there is a kind of a roadmap or a document where I can
get up-to-date with all those targets and especially what we want to
achieve in 3.0.
I don't think we have such a doc...
I think the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718793#action_12718793
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1403:
Note that with matchVersion
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718795#action_12718795
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1545:
bq. but if you want, i'm willing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-1686:
Priority: Trivial (was: Major)
Remove Unnecessary NULL check in FindSegmentsFile -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-1686:
Attachment: segments_info.patch
Remove Unnecessary NULL check in FindSegmentsFile -
Remove Unnecessary NULL check in FindSegmentsFile - cleanup
---
Key: LUCENE-1686
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1686
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
On Jun 12, 2009, at 3:50 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
hey there,
I see a lot of emails going on about 3.0, getting ready for Java 1.5 (
I guess enums, generics etc) and discussions about back-compat policy.
I'm curious if there is a kind of a roadmap or a document where I can
get up-to-date with
Thanks guys!
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Grant Ingersollgsing...@apache.org wrote:
On Jun 12, 2009, at 3:50 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
hey there,
I see a lot of emails going on about 3.0, getting ready for Java 1.5 (
I guess enums, generics etc) and discussions about back-compat
Remove ExtendedFieldCache by rolling functionality into FieldCache
--
Key: LUCENE-1687
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1687
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler reassigned LUCENE-1686:
-
Assignee: Uwe Schindler
Thanks, I was working on this class some days ago, I will apply
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718815#action_12718815
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1676:
-
OK, I moved to contrib/CHANGES. I'm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler closed LUCENE-1686.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Comitted revision 784094.
This was my fault, because I refactored the class
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718817#action_12718817
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1676:
-
BTW, I'm curious if people have a
Deprecating StopAnalyzer ENGLISH_STOP_WORDS - General replacement with an
immutable Set
---
Key: LUCENE-1688
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1688
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718825#action_12718825
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1545:
-
michael, I don't see a way from the manual to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718827#action_12718827
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1685:
--
I've never gone deep into the highlighters,
3.0 will then be a mechanical release: simply remove all deprecated
APIs, fix all core, contrib, tests to not use those APIs, release, and
immediately begin accepting 1.5 patches.
personally, I wonder if anyone but me is interested in correcting the
issue that unicode character no longer
Hey there,
I have a had quite a couple of usecases where I had to change some
tiny things in basic queries like BooleanQuery. I subclassed those
queries and applied the change - no problem so far. But I wanted
lucene to use this modified query everywhere in other queries and (for
sure) in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718838#action_12718838
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1685:
-
Agreed on all that Mike, I'll try to do that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718840#action_12718840
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1687:
--
As previously noted, FieldCache.DEFAULT is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718845#action_12718845
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1687:
-
True, but you know how we are about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718855#action_12718855
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1685:
I consider it a bug that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718859#action_12718859
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1687:
+1
Remove ExtendedFieldCache by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718858#action_12718858
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1685:
--
bq. I consider it a bug that QueryScorer will
Uwe, how come you inserted this @ 13 instead of appending to the end (20)?
Mike
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:23 AM, uschind...@apache.org wrote:
Author: uschindler
Date: Fri Jun 12 14:23:36 2009
New Revision: 784133
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=784133view=rev
Log:
LUCENE-1592: Add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718863#action_12718863
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1688:
This sounds great Simon!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718861#action_12718861
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1685:
OK.
I think Mark's idea is
I thought this list was sorted by the jira issue number!
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 4:53 PM
To:
It seems JDK 1.5+ is the de facto for darn near everyone...
ant compile-test with JDK 1.4 yields:
common.compile-test:
[javac] Compiling 82 source files to .../lucene/java/clean/build/
classes/test
[javac] /Users/grantingersoll/projects/lucene/java/clean/src/test/
Ahhh :) I think it's sorted by when-issue-got-fixed.
But in fact it's good that this generally seems to match sorting jira
issue number... it means we're being responsive to the issues being
opened (I think?).
Mike
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Uwe Schindleru...@thetaphi.de wrote:
I
Sigh. I'll fix. I should just leave my world on 1.4 until we get 3.0 out...
Mike
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Grant Ingersollgsing...@apache.org wrote:
It seems JDK 1.5+ is the de facto for darn near everyone...
ant compile-test with JDK 1.4 yields:
common.compile-test:
[javac]
+1
Mike
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Simon
Willnauersimon.willna...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hey there,
I have a had quite a couple of usecases where I had to change some
tiny things in basic queries like BooleanQuery. I subclassed those
queries and applied the change - no problem so far.
Can something like AspectJ change the type of instantiated classes?
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Simon
Willnauersimon.willna...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hey there,
I have a had quite a couple of usecases where I had to change some
tiny things in
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Yonik Seeleyyo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
In Solr land we can quickly hack something together, spend some time
thinking about the external HTTP interface, and immediately make it
available to users (those using nightlies at least). It would be a
huge
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Robert Muirrcm...@gmail.com wrote:
3.0 will then be a mechanical release: simply remove all deprecated
APIs, fix all core, contrib, tests to not use those APIs, release, and
immediately begin accepting 1.5 patches.
personally, I wonder if anyone but me is
More importantly, why is Hudson not catching it?
On Jun 12, 2009, at 11:28 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
Sigh. I'll fix. I should just leave my world on 1.4 until we get
3.0 out...
Mike
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Grant
Ingersollgsing...@apache.org wrote:
It seems JDK 1.5+ is
in general most stuff will be ok (code just doesnt mess with the
surrogate pairs)
simple example: things like lowercase filter are not, and
lowercasetokenizer, well, can't fix that since its super
chartokenizer, works on char.
i hope this doesnt sound bad, but in general the transition is simple
Because Hudson compiles with Java 1.5 or even 1.6. Setting -source and
-target to 1.4 in javac does not help, if you are using methods/classes. The
java compiler only checks syntax and creates 1.4 classes. But for compiling
and checking it uses the builtin rt.jar (which is newer).
If you want
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-1539:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1539.patch
Keeps previous deletes (doesn't call undeleteall). When
here is a great link for this topic:
http://www.icu-project.org/docs/papers/supplementaries_iuc21.ppt
so you see it wouldn't be that invasive, and of course you can still
use char[], with some minor modifications to how you process text in
certain places.
its the parameters that take single
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718899#action_12718899
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1539:
Thanks Jason, getting close:
*
The solution could we easier. Hudson has the possibility to define a
specific VM for each different bulid job. If can configure the build
job you can define the used VM.
Simon
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Uwe Schindleru...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Because Hudson compiles with Java 1.5 or even
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718907#action_12718907
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1539:
bq. When existing deletes are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718908#action_12718908
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1407:
bq. I did also run ant test on
Right. That's what I was getting at.
On Jun 12, 2009, at 1:04 PM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
The solution could we easier. Hudson has the possibility to define a
specific VM for each different bulid job. If can configure the build
job you can define the used VM.
Simon
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1407:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
Refactor Searchable to not have RMI Remote
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-1539:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1539.patch
Implemented the changes. Wasn't sure how to floor it.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1526?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718932#action_12718932
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1526:
--
This issue has somewhat changed
supplementary character handling
Key: LUCENE-1689
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1689
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Robert Muir
Priority:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1689:
Attachment: LUCENE-1689_lowercase_example.txt
an example of how LowercaseFilter might be fixed.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718938#action_12718938
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1689:
-
my example has some issues (i.e. it depends
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718939#action_12718939
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1407:
Patch looks good Simon! Thanks.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718943#action_12718943
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1676:
-
I grabbed Apache Harmony's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718942#action_12718942
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1689:
-
icu uses the following idiom to check if a char
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718945#action_12718945
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1599:
MultiSearcher seems to rewrite
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1599:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.9
SpanRegexQuery and SpanNearQuery is not working with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718948#action_12718948
]
Billow Gao commented on LUCENE-1599:
Not there.
If you use the query one those two
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1539:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1539.patch
Updated patch:
* Switched to TermDocs to pick the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718955#action_12718955
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1599:
Hmm... do you have a patch in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718957#action_12718957
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1539:
--
The only small thing that came to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718958#action_12718958
]
Billow Gao commented on LUCENE-1599:
I rewrote the MultiSearcher for my system.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718959#action_12718959
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1630:
We could simply declare, going
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718960#action_12718960
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1539:
I'd say we don't allow that now.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718961#action_12718961
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1539:
Or... maybe we should just do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718962#action_12718962
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1599:
bq. I rewrote the MultiSearcher
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718963#action_12718963
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-1630:
-
Keep in mind that it is easier to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718964#action_12718964
]
Billow Gao commented on LUCENE-1599:
The system is specially designed for special
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12718968#action_12718968
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1630:
My plan was to deprecate Searchable and make it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1539:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1539.patch
Added undelete all if you try to delete to an
On Jun 12, 2009, at 12:20 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Yonik Seeleyyo...@lucidimagination.com
wrote:
In Solr land we can quickly hack something together, spend some time
thinking about the external HTTP interface, and immediately make it
available to users
See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-trunk/857/
--
started
Building remotely on lucene.zones.apache.org (Solaris 10)
ERROR: svn: Invalid argument
svn: OPTIONS request failed on '/repos/asf/lucene/java/trunk'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erik Hatcher reassigned LUCENE-1405:
Assignee: Erik Hatcher
Support for new Resources model in ant 1.7 in Lucene ant task.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll resolved LUCENE-1676.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Lucene Fields: (was: [New])
Committed revision 784297.
New
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1581:
Attachment: TestTurkishCollation.java
i've attached a testcase showing how the collation filters
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12719069#action_12719069
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1581:
-
For reference, I think the concept of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1488:
Attachment: LUCENE-1488.txt
just an update, still more work to be done.
some of the components
Morelikethis queries are very slow compared to other search types
-
Key: LUCENE-1690
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1690
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type:
81 matches
Mail list logo
