[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Richard Marr updated LUCENE-1690:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1690.patch
This patch implements a basic hashmap term frequency cache. It
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12719103#action_12719103
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1690:
This sounds good!
Could we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12719104#action_12719104
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1689:
Robert, could you flesh this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1689:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.9
supplementary character handling
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12719105#action_12719105
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1486:
Is there some reason not to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12719107#action_12719107
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1684:
Thanks Marvin; I think the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12719109#action_12719109
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1488:
ICUAnalyzer looks very useful!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12719115#action_12719115
]
Mark Harwood commented on LUCENE-1486:
--
The primary reason (and perhaps not a
OK, good points Grant. I now agree that it's not a simple task,
moving stuff core stuff from Solr - Lucene. So summing this all up:
* Some feel Lucene should only aim to be the core expert engine
used by Solr/Nutch/etc., so things like moving trie to core (with
consumable naming, good
Very true write up Grant!
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Michael
McCandlessluc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
OK, good points Grant. I now agree that it's not a simple task,
moving stuff core stuff from Solr - Lucene. So summing this all up:
* Some feel Lucene should only aim to be the
I accidentally send this to Yonik directly -- forwarding to mail list.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Yonik Seeleyyo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
Can something like AspectJ change the type of instantiated classes?
That is actually possible. An around advice and do that in a very
flexible way
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12719123#action_12719123
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1689:
-
Michael: LowerCaseFilter doesn't incorrectly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12719125#action_12719125
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-1689:
-
The scary thing is that this happens
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12719126#action_12719126
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1488:
-
Michael, I don't think it will be ready for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12719127#action_12719127
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1689:
-
Simon, I want to address your comment on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12719139#action_12719139
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1689:
-
I am curious how you plan on approaching
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12719146#action_12719146
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1689:
-
Simon, a response to your other comment 'I
On Jun 13, 2009, at 8:58 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
OK, good points Grant. I now agree that it's not a simple task,
moving stuff core stuff from Solr - Lucene. So summing this all up:
* Some feel Lucene should only aim to be the core expert engine
used by Solr/Nutch/etc., so things
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12719158#action_12719158
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1689:
-
i forgot to answer your question Michael:
it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12719174#action_12719174
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1689:
-
Yonik, I think the problem is where method
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12719179#action_12719179
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1689:
--
bq. onik, I think the problem is where method
oups, an error in the code. im on it.
13 jun 2009 kl. 23.54 skrev ka...@apache.org:
Author: kalle
Date: Sat Jun 13 21:54:07 2009
New Revision: 784481
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=784481view=rev
Log:
LUCENE-1578: Support for loading unoptimized readers to the
constructor of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Karl Wettin resolved LUCENE-1578.
-
Resolution: Fixed
comitted
InstantiatedIndex supports non-optimized IndexReaders
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12719188#action_12719188
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1630:
--
bq. We could simply declare, going forward,
Yonik Seeley wrote:
Even non-API changes have tradeoffs... the indexing improvements (err,
total rewrite) made that code *much* harder to understand and debug.
It's a net win since the indexing performance improvements were so
fantastic.
I agree - very hard to follow, worth the improvements.
See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-trunk/858/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
26 matches
Mail list logo
