El jue, 26-04-2007 a las 09:29 +1000, Daniel Noll escribió:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess there are a few points
- it is impossible to stem with total accuracy using rules alone
- combining a rule based stemmer with a dictionary could also be error
prone. Unrelated words can have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess there are a few points
- it is impossible to stem with total accuracy using rules alone
- combining a rule based stemmer with a dictionary could also be error
prone. Unrelated words can have the same stem - consider the past tense of
see and the stem of sawing
Hi, all,
I'm looking for a simple, straightforward example of how to use the
Snowball stemmer to make Lucene search results return all variants of
the terms searched for.
For example, if I search for eat, I'd like Lucene to find eating,
eaten, ate, etc.
In particular, I'm not clear on whether
Hi Andrew,
ahg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 24/04/2007 12:18:22:
Hi, all,
I'm looking for a simple, straightforward example of how to use the
Snowball stemmer to make Lucene search results return all variants of
the terms searched for.
For example, if I search for eat, I'd like Lucene to
Hi Andrew,
The example you provide can only partially be performed using a rule based
stemmer, such as those uesd by Snowball. Most stemmers are capable of
stemming eating, eats, and eaten to eat. However they will not stem ate to
eat.
While in theory you could consturuct some form of dictionary
El mar, 24-04-2007 a las 21:49 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
escribió:
For example, if I search for eat, I'd like Lucene to find eating,
eaten, ate, etc.
Hi Andrew,
The example you provide can only partially be performed using a rule based
stemmer, such as those uesd by Snowball. Most
