I've been trying to use s:decorate in a form. Here is the fragment I am using
to 'decorate':
| ui:composition ...
|
| s:div id=#{id} style=margin-bottom:9px;
| label class=topLabel
| ui:insert name=labelField Label/ui:insert
| /label
| div
| ui:insert
What's changed w.r.t. to JBoss Embeddable and / or SeamTest ?
I was able to move from Seam 2.0.0 to Seam 2.0.1.CR1 (yes the bootstrap stuff
changed a bit in that transition). But now, when trying to upgrade to
2.0.1.GA, I'm getting several exceptions - Here's the first:
| 10:12:49,242
It would be nice if Seam 2.0.1 GA tracked the the jboss-embeddable that
appeared in 2.0.1.CR1 instead of whatever it got released with. I'm all for
bug fixes, documentation improvements, maybe a new feature or feature
improvement. The volatility of the Seam(Test) + JBoss Embeddable stuff is
Error in your docs already:
http://docs.jboss.com/seam/2.0.1.GA/reference/en/html/testing.html#d0e22927
Table 33.1.
anonymous wrote : org.jboss.seam.embedded jboss-embedded-api
lib/test/jboss-embedded-api.jar
looks to me like this jar is in the /lib directory, not /lib/test.
Brad
Hello,
Is it possible to come up with something 'quieter' for the case where a user is
not logged in and needs redirection to become logged in? Having lots of these
exceptions
| 10:58:07,196 ERROR [SeamPhaseListener] uncaught exception
| org.jboss.seam.security.NotLoggedInException
|
I see I've already asked for this before - thanks for the update.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4117627#4117627
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4117627
Pete,
It's a been a few weeks (~6 ;-)) but I ultimately reverted to session scope for
most of our state in the simple application in which the issue arose. Thus, I
don't have a solution for the problem I ran into here.
I will be in my office mid-next week and can look at that specific
Damian,
thirdPartyHelper is a SLSB - the intent here is to simply provide the suggested
options - it takes about 2-3 seconds to respond.
my core:manager settings are as follows:
| core:manager concurrent-request-timeout=500
| conversation-timeout=90
|
Here's one difference between my poms for an ear and yours.
In the parent pom, it's my experience that I should generally build the ejb
jar(s) before the webapp war(s) - often the webapp(s) depend on the ejb(s)
(mainly for custom converters).
| modules
| moduleejb/module
|
Pete,
I went to 10 seconds concurrent-request-timeout=1 - no luck. I looked
over the documentation on that in the manual (just above section 6.9.1 which I
used to come up with the settings used in the suggestionbox attributes). The
basic flow I am trying to 'do' is:
a.) on an editor
Seam-mail requires facelets - maybe some of the other seam components do too.
I think you can simply add facelets to your .war or .ear and not use it for
view (page) template creation. Why not just add it?
From your exception above, it seems like the Tomcat loader is complaining
about
I am having trouble 'staying in conversation' using a SFSB that backs a parent
form and a child form.
From the parent form, I have the following navigation rule:
| page view-id=/MMktIssuer.xhtml login-required=true
| ...
| navigation
There's been some research into Seam + Maven 2 unit testing in this thread.
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopict=122406postdays=0postorder=ascstart=0
Transitive dependencies suck - anytime you put an exclusion into your pom
you're fixing a problem due to this so-called feature
anonymous wrote : Well the error you posted is because your jndiPattern isn't
getting set I think. That's what it looks like, but I've set the jndiPattern,
even wrote code to query the JNDI tree and list all the bound objects - I'm
using the right pattern and seam is not finding it (in my
WEB-INF/components.xml? no - I'm trying to boot the embedded jboss ONLY from
an ejb module that's part of a larger ear project. This all worked nicely in
Seam 1.2.1. I say that because (as you probably know quite well by now ;-))
that I am immensely frustrated at things like core:ejb
please start a new thread with this topic I am having trouble simply getting
the most basic test to work
Thanks
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4100835#4100835
Reply to the post :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : In Seam 1.2 and earlier we used Embedded EJB3, now
we use Embedded JBoss, two different projects.anonymous wrote :
| |
| | Clearly!
| |
| | anonymous wrote :
| | | These are the instructions that I wrote for using the Eclipse
TestNG plugin
Pete,
Do you know what's up with vfsfile as a protocol in JBoss Embedded?
| ERROR [org.jboss.embedded.DeploymentScanner] Failed to deploy
| org.jboss.deployers.spi.DeploymentException: Unable to find deployDir from
url: file:/c:/work/BusinessIntelligence/InfoStratGui/app/target/test-clas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : I suggest you use the
latest version of facelets (in which this bug has been fixed. Facelets 1.1.14)
and ui:repeat and not tomahawk at all. If you still see this problem with
Facelets 1.1.14 then post on the facelets mailing list.
|
|
| [DEBUG] Test Classpath :
| [DEBUG] c:\work\BusinessIntelligence\InfoStratGui\app\target\classes
| [DEBUG] c:\work\BusinessIntelligence\InfoStratGui\app\target\test-classes
| [DEBUG] C:\Documents and
Settings\a428302\.m2\repository\javax\faces\jsf-impl\1.2_04\jsf-impl-1.2_04.jar
Pete,
I have this figured out now. No need to investigate any further.
Thanks,
Brad
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4100350#4100350
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4100350
ok, now I have this to figure out:
| On=null whenRequired=Described resolved=false
demand=persistence.units:jar=classes.jar,unitName=InfoStratGui} **
| persistence.units:jar=classes.jar,unitName=InfoStratGui -
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
I don't believe wrong is the correct term to describe the situation, rather,
from your (Seam team) perspective, you provide examples that are based on
'things' being in places in the Seam 2.0.0.CR(X) distribution. Thus, jars like
jboss-embedded-all.jar are not truly all. I say that because I
I see that if hibernate-annotations 3.3.0 is in the classpath, I get the last
error, now I am up to this:
| *** CONTEXTS IN ERROR: Name - Error
| UNKNOWN - ** UNRESOLVED [EMAIL
PROTECTED]:jar=classes,name=RatingsHelperBean,service=EJB3 depen
| dsOn=null whenRequired=Described
It looks like when the local-jdbc connection pool manager is trying to connect
to the DB, it's running into issues:
| 13:43:18,374 DEBUG
org.jboss.ejb3.entity.PersistenceUnitDeployment.(start:187) - Found
persistence.xml file in EJB3 jar
| 13:43:20,156 WARN
hopefully this is the last question I have on the jboss embedded container.
I'm currently having trouble on boot - it says here:
| init(com.wachovia.evergreen.apps.infostrat.BootStrapTest) Time elapsed: 0
sec FAILURE!
| java.lang.RuntimeException: Could not create Component:
Strange how ComponentTest doesn't come with support for init()'ing the
container environment. I see by adding init() (and begin()) that I can get
farther, now Seam doesn't know how to create my component. Guess it's time to
try FacesRequest again ... sigh
Thanks
View the original post :
it looks like the version of testng supplied with Seam 2.0.0.CR3 is
5.6-200706070953 (from MANIFEST.MF file). The maven2 surefire plugin docs are
based on testng 4.7 (which I was using - see previous post in thread).
So has anyone out there found a way to get maven2-surefire to work with
is this dependency no longer sufficient?
| dependency
| groupIdorg.testng/groupId
| artifactIdtestng/artifactId
| version4.7/version
| scopetest/scope
| classifierjdk15/classifier
| /dependency
|
here is the test I am working with at the
oh yes, one rant - if a specific version of testng is required, then what
happened to the days when frameworks listed out their depedencies including
versions? Has listing depedencies gone the way of documentation? ;-)
from an old version of hibernate:
| ant.jar (1.5.3)
| - Ant core
|
this link is even better - pay close attention to the maven-surefire-plugin
version
http://www.martingilday.org/blog/2007/sep/12/testng-and-maven/
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=409#409
Reply to the post :
The testng docs provide some assistance with getting Maven2 and Testng 5.X to
work http://testng.org/doc/maven.html#maven2...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=402#402
Reply to the post :
It looks like you actually need more than the libs in the
${JBOSS_SEAM_HOME}/lib/test/ directory. So far, I've had to add these
dependencies as well:
| dependency!-- required to boot jboss embedded --
| groupIdorg.jboss.seam/groupId
|
so it looks like all that I learned about using JBoss embedded in Seam 1.2.1
and earlier is null and void. I see that I need to now figure out a project
configuration that will copy the bootstrap directory stuff into
target/test-classes and figure out all the stuff like this:
|
Hello,
I used to be able to boot JBoss embedded from Seam tests in my app in the 1.2.1
and earlier days (was it only 6 months ago?). Anyway, now when I run my tests,
I am getting null-pointer exceptions from a class called SeamBaseTest. For
example:
| public class
Pete,
Yes - the whole test. I'm mainly trying to recover the ability to bootstrap
the JBoss embeddable from maven 2 in the test phase. Figuring that out the
first time was horrible (more than a year ago). Is there an enumerated list of
dependencies for writing Seam tests that use JPA +
anonymous wrote : we need JBoss Tools to be able to work with a maven structure
first.
JBoss Tools? Try IDEA 7.0 - works seamlessly with Maven 2 poms ;-) - no need
to wait.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4099686#4099686
Reply to the post :
tynor wrote : anonymous wrote : I think /build/root.pom.xml ought to be
enough for figuring out versions, so I don't think a VERSIONS.txt file is
necessary.
|
| Perhaps so. My experience on a previous project that used Maven's ant
dependency management plugin (as seam-gen apparently does
wuhaixing wrote : Thanks,I have readed the thread.
| And I also found
this,http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/CASC/CASLoginModule+for+JAAS+applications
| Do u think this is a better way?
| I'm know little about JAAS and CAS,so I cann't do the decision by myself.
| Thanks for all of you!
Use this link
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/CASC/Seam+Identity+Integration+%28Seam+1.2.1+-+2.0.0%29
instead.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4091037#4091037
Reply to the post :
I use CAS and I have this working. You may want to review this thread
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopict=119167.
I use a different approach than the CAS Filter for authentication, but the
process should be the same because by the time Seam steps in to the request
processing
One other item - CAS SSO server should be deployed standalone in a separate
server. Your Seam app (or any app) typically should not be presenting its own
login page in a CAS SSO architecture. In other words, there shouldn't be any
concept of a 'login.xhtml' in your CAS-adapted Seam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : You could probably define a navigation rule in
pages.xml for your login page that uses isLoggedIn(true) to attempt an
authentication and if successful redirect to another page without displaying
the login page. You may need to extend Identity (or RuleBasedIdentity)
stephen.friedrich wrote :
|
| Proposal: Here's a way to make integration into an SSO solution easier:
| Add an attribute to identity that lets me specify a method that is used to
try auto-login:
|
| | security:identity
authenticate-method=#{authenticator.authenticate}
stephen.friedrich wrote : Brad, can't you use a similar checkLogin() method
like in my code above?
| It call identity.login(); which will call your authenticate method.
| In that method I use
|redirect.setViewId(nextPage);
| to redirect to a different page depending on the users
Hello,
I want to chime in with a friendly reminder regarding this task
http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBSEAM-967 (which if you search the forum,
shane, you'll find that you offered to add this if I posted a JIRA issue).
Anyway, by the time the Seam web-app gets to process the request,
Hello,
I'm having trouble with Seam Mail on JBoss 4.2 (both 4.2.0 and 4.2.1). What
appears to be happening is that a particular SLSB which requires the mail
session (@In[jected] by Seam), is not being deployed. All other Session beans
which then depend on the Mail SLSB are subsequently not
Hi Pete,
I appreciate your suggestion and info, however, the reason I used the @Resource
approach is because in the past, when this bean woke up to perform its timeout
method, the Seam annotations would not be obeyed (since the timeout method is
not being invoked in a JSF request). I don't
you can also use basic Servlet-container security to achieve a similar result:
| security-constraint
| web-resource-collection
| web-resource-namerestricted-urls/web-resource-name
| url-pattern/myapp/auth/*/url-pattern
| /web-resource-collection
|
Hello,
I have the following rule:
| page view-id=/abo_edit.xhtml no-conversation-view-id=/index.xhtml
| navigation
from-action=#{aboDelegateManager.setApplicationABODelegate}
| render view-id=/abo_edit_successful.xhtml/
| /navigation
| /page
|
If I type the URL
Ah thanks Jacob - that's what I was looking for; a specific suggestion to
achieve a result - not a pointer to yet another research path. Thanks very
much - that worked!
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4084489#4084489
Reply to the post :
ElliotG wrote : [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : Why is that cleaner? Because
someone wrote a paper that says so?
|
| This is the first thread I read in the forum. I am considering Seam for new
development projects, I hope this hostility is not prevalent throughout the
site and organization.
|
I've asked this before...
Will there be a release of Seam 1.3.0 which appeared as an alpha earlier this
year?
In particular, I was hoping to get fixes for this
http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBSEAM-967
If my memory is correct, Gavin responded that he has changed the Seam code too
much for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : anonymous wrote : It's not necessarily straight
forward to just force several teams of developers to upgrade their version of
Seam, and also their version of JBoss AS in order to obtain bug fixes.
|
| Well, here you actually have a much easier option: Seam 1.2.1
Let's say your Seam component that contains this @Factory is session scoped;
then you need to remove the current license from the session context. Example:
| public String persistAndContinue(){
| super.persist();
| Contexts.getSessionContext().remove(license);
|
anonymous wrote : It didn´t works!
Well, you should probably post your entire component then and the markup that
you claim is 'submit the action'.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4081449#4081449
Reply to the post :
Hmmm
EntityHome isn't well documented in Seam 1.2.1 (which is what I currently use)
and so without reviewing the EntityHome impl code in Seam, I'll have to guess a
bit here.
On closer inspection of your code, it looks like whether createInstance() is
invoked or persistAndContinue() is
Hello,
Is there going to be a Seam 1.2.2 or 1.3.0 release?
Also, the nightly builds have not been available for many weeks. Are nightly
builds of Seam 2.0.0 ever going to be available again
(http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/artifacts/jboss-seam-builds)?
Thanks,
Brad Smith
View the original
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : 1) We are now working entirely on Seam2, Seam
1.2.1.GA is part of the Application Platform though, and will be maintained
| 2) Not from the community releases, but the application platform will offer
this (still should soon be GA IIRC)
| 3) The migration guide is in
I'm probably missing something trivial, but I am stuck with an @Out issue and
hopefully someone can point something out.
First, I have a Seam component that is JavaBean; annotated as such:
@Name(evergreenUser)
| @Roles( {
| @Role(name=accessRequestUser,
Never mind.
Apparently, it's the redirect in pages.xml
| rule if-outcome=2
| redirect view-id=/user_access_request_step_2.xhtml/
| /rule
|
that's causing the problem. I changed to render and now the @Outjection is
working.
| rule if-outcome=2
|
the seam nightly builds are still 'stuck' on 06.14.2007 as the last build - any
chance the nightly builds will resume being posted regularly?
Thanks,
Brad
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4056002#4056002
Reply to the post :
OK - will check this too - thanks!
Brad
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4055196#4055196
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4055196
___
jboss-user mailing
Due to firewall issues, I use the Seam nightly builds for testing 'what's in
CVS.' The last build available at
http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/artifacts/jboss-seam-builds is dated
jboss-seam-CVS.20070614.zip (as of this morning 20070618). Any chance a
nightly build made after your commits
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : This is done in CVS, Brad, please try it out!
Ok - it will take me a few days to review this issue and try this out.
Thanks,
Brad
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4054957#4054957
Reply to the post :
I'm working on some code where I am trying to do the following:
1. User clicks a link to an action method on a SFSB
2. method is annotated with @Begin, using a custom conversation id
2a. the custom conversation id comes from the following
2a-1. a @Factory method in a SLSB creates a new persistent
Never mind - it looks like (after reviewing in detail the documentation) that
conversation is not really a good scope for entities. Instead, it looks like a
solution based on private state in an SFSB and using the manager pattern
(@Unwrap) may be a better way of doing this.
Thanks,
Brad Smith
Any chance some of these bug fixes will get backported to a Seam 1.2.X release?
I (of course) would like the new features and bug fixes of Seam 1.3.0, but I
can't necessarily upgrade my entire infrastructure to get the bug fixes. We're
probably going to be on JBoss 4.0.4-4.0.5 for a quite a
I ran into the problem described here -
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-1938
while trying to use EntityHome in Seam 1.2.1 on JBoss 4.0.4 EJB3 RC8.
I tried the suggested changes with still no success. I believe that my
version of JBoss + EJB3 is the culprit here.
thanks
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4053665#4053665
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4053665
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lists.jboss.org
In section 5.1.1.2. Navigation in the Seam documentation, there is the
following example:
| page view-id=/editDocument.xhtml
|
| navigation from-action=#{documentEditor.update}
| rule if=#{documentEditor.errors.empty}
| redirect
I have the following SeamTest (FacesRequest) method:
| @Override
| protected void invokeApplication() throws Exception {
|
| AccessRequestManager2 arm2 = (AccessRequestManager2)
getInstance(accessRequestManager2);
| assert arm2
I @In(jected) the conversation component into my bean and then added some code
to dump the conversation id in the method invokation. It looks like that's
working correctly, it's the SeamTest.FacesRequest that appears to be losing
track of the conversation id.
New
nested conversations? no - I wasn't planning on it in this use case. The main
thing here is that I was trying to test from SeamTest.FacesRequest that the
explicit (custom-generated) conversation id is the conversation id. It looks
like the expression for my explicit id is being evaluated the
rharari wrote : Hi Brad,
|
| I´ve a question:
|
| anonymous wrote :
| | We are evaluating a few open source portals.
| |
|
| Please, can you post or send me and e-mail describing which open source
portals your team are evaluating? And also explain why you have decided to
The only thing that I think I did differently from you is that I didn't use
JEMS to create a portal installation - I just created 4.0.5 with ejb3 profile.
I can't figure out what I did differently from you - maybe you used a different
source for 2.6CR2 than the JBoss website download?
Anyway,
bsmithjj wrote : As I look into this more, look at the source code for 2.6,
the wiki link you supplied, etc. I really am beginning to think that in some
ways, you're losing your way with the security layer of JBoss Portal...
|
I've noticed in the so-called 'candidate releases (CR),' 1 and 2
oh yes - I forgot the stack trace
| 09:18:40,432 ERROR STDERR -
org.jboss.portal.core.controller.ResourceAccessDeniedException: Not Authorized
has denied access
| 09:18:40,432 ERROR STDERR - at
My environment:
Windows
JBoss 4.0.5 with EJB3
MySQL 5.0.37 with Connector 5.0.4
JDK 1.5
I downloaded JBoss Portal 2.6-CR2, placed it in the deploy directory, started
the server up, logged in as admin, clicked the Admin link (that worked), then
clicked the dashboard link and got a blank white
Yes - I used the JEMS installer (1.2.0) to create 4.0.5 + EJB3.
Thanks
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4045511#4045511
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4045511
I am having some issues setting up a simple Tomahawk datatable that is sortable
and as an extra, I've added in the Ajax4jsf tags to try to make the sort
requests function as Ajax requests. The issue I am having is that the table
renders fine on the initial display. When I click a column
Never mind - I just removed preserveDataModel=true from the t:dataTable
.../ tag and all is working now.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4042113#4042113
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4042113
Pete - thanks for the link (looks like we posted at almost the same time).
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4042115#4042115
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4042115
Hey,
I haven't seen Gavin on the forum in a few weeks now - what's going on?
Thanks
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4037672#4037672
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4037672
I missed that post - thanks!
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4037700#4037700
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4037700
___
jboss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : As far as I know this should work - there's nothing
special about the EL expressions used for restrictions, i.e. they are not
required to contain only Seam Security-related expressions. As long as the
expression evaluates to a boolean it should be fine.
I have, in
anonymous wrote : If you are not using Identity to authenticate then you need
to override Identity.checkRestriction() with your own implementation that
doesn't check isLoggedIn().
This is what I suspected - that restrict\ and @Restrict require the Identity
component. And so it sounds like the
how could that be a seam issue? h:commandLink is a JSF tag
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4034252#4034252
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4034252
___
Hello,
I was trying to make us of the tag in pages.xml to restrict access to a page
based on whether or not a user has a role as reported by the Servlet container
(instead of using Seam security):
| restrict#{isUserInRole['Admin']}/restrict
|
Is this even possible? If not, is it
The problem is that the Seam security model is tightly coupled to a JAAS model
of security - i.e. the Subject class and friends. With CAS and our custom
Tomcat Valve, the servlet container associates/manages a copy of the
authenticated Principal (a.k.a. userPrincipal in Seam) with the
Hello,
I was reading Gavin's blog and saw this:
anonymous wrote :
| Also new in this release is ... and support for conversation propagation
via a business key (ie. instead of seeing conversationId=3 in your URL, you
would see orderId=45656).
|
Looking through the documentation on
fers wrote : Hello,
|
| I want to let you know that I have created Maven packages for Seam
1.2.1.GA.
|
| As usually you can find it on http://software.softeu.cz/seam/ .
|
| Petr Ferschmann
I've deployed this release in our Maven 2 repository as well, but that's on our
intranet
Hello,
I have a SFSB1 - it has an a field that is marked @In @Out. This same bean has
an @Observer method that listens for an event raised by another SFSB2.
Here is the trouble I am having. In a conversation, I click a link which
invokes a method on SFSB2 - this method in SFSB2 is annotated
anonymous wrote : I don't understand why you don't call
BusinessProcess.instance().setProcessId() before doing any work with jBPM
Hey - go easy on me ;-) - BusinessProcess isn't well explained or discussed in
the documentation so its taking a while for this stuff to sink in. This is in
In your code that alters data raise an event:
| Events.instance().raiseEvent(YOUR_EVENT_NAME);
|
In code that can refresh the data model:
| @Observer(YOUR_EVENT_NAME)
| public void refreshTheDataModel() {
|
| // your code to refresh the data model goes here
|
Hello,
I have the following DecisionHandler node:
| decision name=IsTerminationRequest
expression=#{workItemManager.isTerminationRequest}
| transition to=Check Provisioning Type name=isTerminationRequest/
| transition to=ABO Approve-Reject Request name=aboApprove/
|
in a request, a task-node get's transitioned to decision handler which
transitions to this decision handler.
task - decision handler 1 - decision handler 2
So specifically, what I am after is what do I know I can use these components
for in decision handler 2? Yes, we get to decision 2 from
A quick test of a few components shows that when DecisionHandler invokes the
desired method, we have the following:
| 16:42:33,228 INFO com.evergreen.accesscontrol.impl.WorkItemManagerBean -
jbpmContext - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| 16:42:33,228 INFO
I would think it's fair to have the processInstance that a DecisionHandler
belongs to be in scope - it's not - so now I have to figure out how to resolve
this in the EJB method call - or, again, write a custom DecisionHandler and use
the executionContext.getProcessInstance() method to achieve
anonymous wrote : I receive the following error:
| java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/commons/fileupload/FileUpload
|
| But I never used this component
|
Regardless of the fact that you never used it, you need to make sure
commons-fileupload is in your classpath. It can be
1 - 100 of 248 matches
Mail list logo
