See:
- http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4022949#4022949
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4022950#4022950
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4022950
Is it really enough just to register ActionFactory in MBeanServer or provide it
a jndi name? Why KernelControllerContextAware must be called in this case by
the server?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3999497#3999497
Reply to the post :
If you use something similar to JMXIntroduction or JNDIIntroduction (see
TestCases), you don't have to use KCCA.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3999508#3999508
Reply to the post :
Sorry, here is jboss-beans.xml:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
| deployment xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
| xsi:schemaLocation=urn:jboss:bean-deployer
bean-deployer_1_0.xsd xmlns=urn:jboss:bean-deployer
|bean name=addProvider
DGuralnik wrote :
| ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
| deployment xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
| xsi:schemaLocation=urn:jboss:bean-deployer
bean-deployer_1_0.xsd xmlns=urn:jboss:bean-deployer
|
|
|
|
Try using
I wouldn't like switching to 2.0 because JBoss AS 4.0.5 has Microcontainer 1.0.
I think the stateless bean is not important in the discussion. I don't
understant how to use this Microcontainer. Spring was pretty easy.
So I has beans I declared in jboss-beans.xml. To load them I need a kernel
DGuralnik wrote : I wouldn't like switching to 2.0 because JBoss AS 4.0.5 has
Microcontainer 1.0.
|
Yes, but as a separate deployer, right?
DGuralnik wrote :
| I think the stateless bean is not important in the discussion. I don't
understant how to use this Microcontainer. Spring was
DGuralnik wrote :
| Is it NOT enough to have mcp.beans file with the beans and the xml
description that is packed to my ear?
|
It is enough, but I would still change it to v2.0.Beta (or trunk from SVN) - a
lot of new features.
anonymous wrote :
| If it is NOT, what way is to have all
