[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam 1.2 released

2007-02-27 Thread dmp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : Note that there is one silly minor issue in this release that you need an internet connection to run Seam. (We missed updating the version number of the DTD of the components.xml file in the Seam jar.) | | We might do a patch release to fix this, but anyhoo it is

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam 1.2 released

2007-02-27 Thread dmp
ooops. Somehow ended up quoting the end of the message when I hit submit... Last quote was unintended. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4023431#4023431 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4023431

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam 1.2 released

2007-02-27 Thread dmp
Ah, it appears the updated dtd is in the jar, but when you explode jboss-seam.jar you'll find a components.xml under META-INF that references the 1.1 version of the DTD. :%s/1.1/1.2/g should hopefully have fixed this for me. I'll find out soon enough. View the original post :

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - Re: Seam 1.2 released

2007-02-27 Thread dmp
Based on the stack trace below, I don't think my little hack worked. Since the this server running this code sits behind a fairly restrictive proxy, how can I fix this problem? tia, -Doug Exception during request processing: org.dom4j.DocumentException: Connection timed out: connect Nested

[jboss-user] [JBoss Seam] - easy alternatives to ui:repeat and c:forEach for Seam 1.2.0P

2007-04-17 Thread dmp
I have had nothing but trouble with ui:repeat, as it stops repeating on a regular basis and only show a single result until the app server was restarted. c:forEach seemed reasonable, but it is way, way slow compared to ui:repeat. I am not rendering a table, so h:dataTable wouldn't work for