v1 of the reusable workflows is now running on Java 17, thanks all
On Wednesday 8 May 2024 at 05:47:52 UTC+1 jone...@gmail.com wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 8:41:48 PM UTC+2 m...@basilcrow.com wrote:
>
>> Yes, I think the default should be changed to Java 17 and a new
>> version
Hi
as Jesse said in the PR, this change should be safe to do now so +1 from me.
On Tuesday 7 May 2024 at 14:25:55 UTC+1 lemeurher...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I should have probably let existing maintainers opening a pull request for
> that but here is a proposed change to bump the Java
Approved
On Tuesday 12 March 2024 at 11:12:38 UTC michael...@visualon.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i like to use renovate on my two adopted repos.
> Can someone with organization admin permissions enable it for me?
>
> - https://github.com/jenkinsci/additional-identities-plugin
> -
I've granted Alex admin access
On Monday, 5 June 2023 at 15:25:46 UTC+1 wfoll...@cloudbees.com wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks Alex for your continued effort in the project :-)
>
> On Monday, June 5, 2023 at 1:15:42 PM UTC+2 timja...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
+1
On Wednesday, 26 October 2022 at 13:18:13 UTC+1 goun...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi group,
>
> I sometimes run the Platform SIG meeting (like
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2322YxIciQ) and would like to be able to
> post the resulting video to YouTube when Mark is on PTO for example.
>
I've switched it to pr-head for a trial run. (Core and Tools folders only)
Jesse has been advocating it for over 4 years now.
Let's give it a go.
Easy to revert back if we find pr-merge was better
On Wednesday, 6 July 2022 at 18:44:38 UTC+1 Jesse Glick wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 3, 2022 at 5:13 AM
There's been a request for https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/JENKINS-67635
to be backported
Just merged in https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/6193
Any thoughts?
On Monday, 17 January 2022 at 15:24:27 UTC imon...@cloudbees.com wrote:
> Backporting has started and the RC is scheduled for
y backports harder to versions that still support IE
> (should they be needed for any security or regression, but that would be
> the same for any change) so I doubt it has any impact on this descision..
>
> /James
>
> On Monday, January 17, 2022 at 7:37:32 AM UTC timja...@gmail.
adme
>
> /James
> On Monday, October 11, 2021 at 5:05:09 PM UTC+1 timja...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Adding Daniel to cc
>>
>> On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 at 16:45, Jamie Tanna wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Gavin,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the reply - it's helpuful to u
Seem's like GitHub won't break the fork relationship anymore without both
sides agreeing to it?
They've done it in the past for me but wouldn't do it yesterday.
GH> In the two scenarios you have:
DB>> It is possible to invert the fork relationship. This requires approval
from both repo owners
This
works:
https://repo.jenkins-ci.org/snapshots/org/jenkins-ci/main/jenkins-war/2.289.3-SNAPSHOT/jenkins-war-2.289.3-20210716.091232-1.war
On Monday, 19 July 2021 at 09:10:47 UTC+1 imon...@cloudbees.com wrote:
> Go for it Mark! :-)
>
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 6:27 PM Mark Waite wrote:
>
>>
Hello
If you have time please create a PR for the backports
> PD: Something else, I saw that we are not publishing release candidate
wars into http://mirrors.jenkins-ci.org/war-stable-rc/, Does the process
change and we are not publishing anymore?
No, there didn't seem to be any point, I've
Done
On Wednesday, 6 January 2021 at 21:55:26 UTC Jesse Glick wrote:
> I filed INFRA-2866 to track.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
, and fixing any issue I hit, mostly
very minor.
I agree with Jesse that we should start testing against Java 17 when the
previews are released and I'm happy to help with the infra side of that
Thanks
Tim
On Sunday, 13 December 2020 at 11:21:35 UTC timja...@gmail.com wrote:
> Initial atte
Hi David
I would also like to update the database-mysql plugin
Is that fine too?
Thanks
Tim
On Monday, 17 August 2020 at 15:24:33 UTC+1 da...@vanlaatum.id.au wrote:
> Sure
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 17 Aug 2020, at 4:52 pm, Tim Jacomb wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi
>
> I would like to adopt
Initial attempt here to fix most of the warnings:
https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/5110
Rest of the warnings are caused by groovy and guice, at least on the
controller startup.
On Tuesday, 8 December 2020 at 03:18:39 UTC msi...@cloudbees.com wrote:
> Jetty 10 requires Java 11, so
+100 to moving to picocli
On Monday, 23 November 2020 at 21:02:06 UTC msi...@cloudbees.com wrote:
> I'd be hugely in favor of using picocli. It's what I use in my own CLI
> tools, and the original author of the library is someone I know and
> have worked on OSS projects with (Log4j2 in
Two week timeout completed, I'll proceed with this adoption request
On Sunday, 1 November 2020 at 09:11:02 UTC timja...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi
>
> I would like to adopt https://github.com/jenkinsci/postbuild-task-plugin/
>
> Last adopted here https://groups.google.com/g/
Only the repo permission PR is needed :)
sorting for you
On Thursday, 8 October 2020 at 08:55:38 UTC+1 pib...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'd like to be added to the maintainers of the cloudbees-jenkins-advisor.
> Arnaud, one of the maintainers, agrees with this request as visible in
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
