RE: Patterns in Role-based strategy

Thank you, works -Original Message- From: jenkinsci-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:jenkinsci-users@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of matthew.web...@diamond.ac.uk Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 4:50 AM To: jenkinsci-users@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: Patterns in Role-based strategy

RE: Patterns in Role-based strategy

Try (?!.*PROD).* Matthew -Original Message- From: jenkinsci-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:jenkinsci-users@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Ginga, Dick Sent: 15 September 2015 20:28 To: jenkinsci-users@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: Patterns in Role-based strategy I've tried them

RE: Patterns in Role-based strategy

Actually, what does not work is: ?!PROD.* = meaning anything but jobs having PROD in their name. I actually get a OOPS - stack trace when I use this From: Ginga, Dick Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 10:28 AM To: jenkinsci-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Patterns in Role-based strategy How

RE: Patterns in Role-based strategy

-users@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Patterns in Role-based strategy On 15.09.2015, at 21:14, Ginga, Dick <dick.gi...@perkinelmer.com> wrote: > ?!PROD.* = meaning anything but jobs having PROD in their name. I actually > get a OOPS – stack trace when I use this You forgot the parenthes

Re: Patterns in Role-based strategy

On 15.09.2015, at 21:14, Ginga, Dick wrote: > ?!PROD.* = meaning anything but jobs having PROD in their name. I actually > get a OOPS – stack trace when I use this You forgot the parentheses. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google