lucasbru commented on PR #13876:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13876#issuecomment-1630247754
@jolshan -- I will discuss the remaining scope with @guozhangwang now that
he's back. Can we merge this restricted PR?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
lucasbru commented on PR #13876:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13876#issuecomment-1614928567
@jolshan This makes sense. It seems to me that I need to go through the
whole KIP and have an end-to-end solution before addressing these kinds of
consistency problems. At least for the
lucasbru commented on PR #13876:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13876#issuecomment-1611471103
@jolshan Yes, the main reason for wrapping was consistency. However, I'm now
considering a different kind of consistency - never wrap fatal errors - which
is what was originally
lucasbru commented on PR #13876:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13876#issuecomment-1600924404
> 1. We might end up breaking customer's application code for exception
handling with this change. What is our plan to prevent the inadvertent impact
to customer's code on upgrade?
>
