mjsax commented on PR #13283:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13283#issuecomment-2089475025
Very happy to see some activity on this PR. The release plan is in the wiki:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Release+Plan+3.8.0
Feature freeze is May/29, so there
vamossagar12 commented on PR #13283:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13283#issuecomment-2071431998
No worries and thanks for the proposed help! There are some things which I
need to close out but I do hope to close it out.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
ableegoldman commented on PR #13283:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13283#issuecomment-2061827689
No pressure! Just wanted to make sure you weren't still waiting on me for
this. Or rather, just wanted to say, if you do want to try and get this in to
3.8 I will make sure to help
vamossagar12 commented on PR #13283:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13283#issuecomment-2060631731
hey @ableegoldman .. i am interested in wrapping this up but i haven't
looked at the streams codebase for some time and things seemed to have changed
a bit. I am not aware of the
ableegoldman commented on PR #13283:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13283#issuecomment-2059442356
Hey @vamossagar12 sorry the second half of this KIP has dragged on for so
long. Are you still interested in getting this done? I think we can target it
for 3.8 if you have time on
vamossagar12 commented on PR #13283:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13283#issuecomment-1837036580
@ableegoldman , just checking if you got a chance to look at my comment
above? Don't mean to be pushy on this but since 3.7 release is approaching, I
thought I would want to have
vamossagar12 commented on PR #13283:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13283#issuecomment-1824302840
Thanks @ableegoldman , that makes sense. Well I have another question again
due to me not being upto date with the latest developments in streams. I have
this test in
ableegoldman commented on PR #13283:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13283#issuecomment-1815619664
> do we need this pausing semantics for ReadOnlyTask as well?
Alright so I'm not super familiar with this new code which seems to be
related to the state updater, but IIUC the
sean-rossignol commented on PR #13283:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13283#issuecomment-1814804253
> Hey @sean-rossignol , thanks for explaining your use case and how this can
be useful for you! I hope to push it in the upcoming 3.7 release. I haven't
gotten the chance to
vamossagar12 commented on PR #13283:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13283#issuecomment-1813728802
hey @ableegoldman , quick question. I am noticing that tests like
`shouldRecoverFromInvalidOffsetExceptionOnRestoreAndFinishRestore` are failing
with an error like
```
vamossagar12 commented on PR #13283:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13283#issuecomment-1811121235
Hey @sean-rossignol , thanks for explaining your use case and how this can
be useful for you! I hope to push it in the upcoming 3.7 release. I haven't
gotten the chance to resolve
sean-rossignol commented on PR #13283:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13283#issuecomment-1809404175
Hey, anyway I could help unblock this pr @vamossagar12 ?
We have an internal kstreams app with a wildcard consumer and one bottleneck
we're hitting is as the number of
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #13283:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/13283#issuecomment-1765609193
This PR is being marked as stale since it has not had any activity in 90
days. If you would like to keep this PR alive, please ask a committer for
review. If the PR has
13 matches
Mail list logo
