Most browsers cannot determine the width of an element if it is not
currently visible. That includes the case where one of the parent
elements is hidden. That makes sense when you think about it; the
layout engine doesn't know how the element would look unless it's
visible and interacting
I don't think it makes a difference whether the elements are in the
DOM or not; if you assign a src property the browser can start to
fetch the data. I've taken advantage of that before with new Image()
to do preloading. It's probably browser-dependent but in any case I'd
say it's outside the
thanks for reporting that, Bil. I'm sure a lot of people will be happy
to hear that!
--Karl
Karl Swedberg
www.englishrules.com
www.learningjquery.com
On Nov 25, 2008, at 6:59 PM, Bil Corry wrote:
Bil Corry wrote on 9/9/2008 11:43 AM:
Google, on the other hand, doesn't use
Is what will appear for each image exactly the same (other than maybe an
id or something)? If so, you could use jQuery's .append method to move
the thing that appears around on the page. If you're fading out the
thing that appears, append might not work if you don't want to wait for
the fade
The image will be different as will the IDs. I was thinking of using animate
instead of append to make the tabs appear to slide out from beneath the
image. Would append work for that? Not entirely sure what append does. I
don't want to have to wait for the image to completely appear before I can
yes the content of pop-up is in external file.
I tried with ID also but not able to hide it.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:41 AM, brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the content of the pop-up (including the close link) an external file?
In any case, why not just give the pop-up div an ID?
On
101 - 106 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
