Re: Proposal for TurboGears2 port

2016-02-15 Thread Thomas De Schampheleire
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Alessandro Molina wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Thomas De Schampheleire > wrote: >> >> I've been reading the Turbogears documentation over the past days, and >> will now dive in more into

Re: Proposal for TurboGears2 port

2016-02-15 Thread Alessandro Molina
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Thomas De Schampheleire < patrickdeping...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I've been reading the Turbogears documentation over the past days, and > will now dive in more into the code you made. > > conf['SQLASession'] = model.DBSession > AttributeError: 'module' object

Re: Proposal for TurboGears2 port

2016-02-10 Thread Alessandro Molina
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Alessandro Molina < alessandro.mol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'll try to manage a proper routing solution instead of trying to fake > standard TG routing like I'm currently doing. > I wrote a much more robust dispatch solution that should now properly handle all

Re: Proposal for TurboGears2 port

2016-02-09 Thread Alessandro Molina
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Thomas De Schampheleire < patrickdeping...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > If you have specific tasks that you want to offload, don't hesitate to > let me know. I can see if I have the knowledge to help with them. > Well, the knowledge I miss most is "what should kallithea

Re: Proposal for TurboGears2 port

2016-02-08 Thread Thomas De Schampheleire
Hi Alessandro, On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Mads Kiilerich wrote: > On 01/23/2016 12:00 AM, Alessandro Molina wrote: >> >> For this reason TurboGears2 might be a good option for Kallithea future > > > Some of the core developers met right before Fosdem and discussed this

Re: Proposal for TurboGears2 port

2016-01-29 Thread Alessandro Molina
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:56 AM, Dominik Ruf wrote: > FYI a weird thing happend. > I pull your latest changes but still got the exception. > But after enabling debug in my development.ini the pages render correctly. Thanks, that pointed out the issue and I fixed it in

Re: Proposal for TurboGears2 port

2016-01-29 Thread Dominik Ruf
FYI a weird thing happend. I pull your latest changes but still got the exception. But after enabling debug in my development.ini the pages render correctly. ___ kallithea-general mailing list kallithea-general@sfconservancy.org

Re: Proposal for TurboGears2 port

2016-01-28 Thread Alessandro Molina
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Dominik Ruf wrote: > I gave it shot but failed :-( > > The first thing were the requirements. > Like you said I had to add some requirements to the setup.py. > "zope.interface" and "repoze.who" > But I don't understand why these are not

Re: Proposal for TurboGears2 port

2016-01-28 Thread Andrew Shadura
On 28/01/16 00:09, Alessandro Molina wrote: >> > Well I can work on a proof of concept and have a version of Kallithea >> > running on TG, but as I don't know much of the codebase and what should be >> > the expected behaviour it will still require much work from the Kallithea >> > team to port

Re: Proposal for TurboGears2 port

2016-01-28 Thread Alessandro Molina
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:34 AM, Mads Kiilerich wrote: > > Do you have an idea of how much work it will be to make a full production > ready migration? Well, no :P I think 90% will probably be ported in a bunch of days, the remaining 10% will probably require to rewrite

Re: Proposal for TurboGears2 port

2016-01-28 Thread Alessandro Molina
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Alessandro Molina < alessandro.mol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > As you can see here: http://blackhole.test.axantweb.com/KallitheaMovie.mp4 > on my environment most controllers are now working, looks like only > controllers related to changesets crash, so I'll have to

Re: Proposal for TurboGears2 port

2016-01-28 Thread Dominik Ruf
I gave it shot but failed :-( The first thing were the requirements. Like you said I had to add some requirements to the setup.py. "zope.interface" and "repoze.who" But I don't understand why these are not installed as dependencies of turbogeards? After adding these two dependencies kallithea

Re: Proposal for TurboGears2 port

2016-01-27 Thread Mads Kiilerich
On 01/28/2016 12:09 AM, Alessandro Molina wrote: I have been able to have a version of Kallithea that starts, logs in and shows the index of repositories in nearly 2 hours of work. Impressive! That proves that TG really seems like an easy way forward ... and/or that you know how to make it

Re: Proposal for TurboGears2 port

2016-01-26 Thread Dominik Ruf
Hi, since pyramid is the successor of pylons can you say something about the differences between the two? ___ kallithea-general mailing list kallithea-general@sfconservancy.org http://lists.sfconservancy.org/mailman/listinfo/kallithea-general

Re: Proposal for TurboGears2 port

2016-01-26 Thread Alessandro Molina
>From the pure historical point of view Pyramid is the successor of Pylons officially, but technically is based on repoze.bfg framework and doesn't have much in common with Pylons from the point of view of APIs and design. It's a very flexible and powerful framework and I used it for a bunch of

Re: Proposal for TurboGears2 port

2016-01-26 Thread Mads Kiilerich
Thanks, Alessandro. I'm very positive to the proposal. I would love if someone already had done all the work or offered to do it. That would (probably) make it a no-brainer to accept it and move in that direction. Short of that, we (the Kallithea community) have to wait for someone else to

Re: Proposal for TurboGears2 port

2016-01-26 Thread Alessandro Molina
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:38 PM, Mads Kiilerich wrote: > Thanks, Alessandro. > > I'm very positive to the proposal. I would love if someone already had > done all the work or offered to do it. That would (probably) make it a > no-brainer to accept it and move in that