https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446468
--- Comment #35 from gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com ---
I still believe it is inconsistent because the selection behaves differently if
the folder icon is of a regular folder or a hidden folder.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=483151
Bug ID: 483151
Summary: Skanpage scans only 75dpi
Classification: Applications
Product: Skanpage
Version: 24.02.0
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446468
--- Comment #30 from gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com ---
Hello all,
Will the new ocean breeze theme have the same white select folder? Btw if a
folder is hidden it does not get white. So it is an inconsistent behavior.
Thanks for an update
Gianluca
--
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=475622
Bug ID: 475622
Summary: Skanpage doesn't change dpi
Classification: Applications
Product: Skanpage
Version: 23.08.2
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446468
--- Comment #28 from gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com ---
Is there any update on this issue? If you could point me in the good code byte
I could spend some time trying to fix it. Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446468
--- Comment #26 from gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com ---
I solved as suggested here by creating a local icon set slightly darker for the
folders, which by the way is even more awesome. After all why to have selection
and folder color the same?
--
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446468
--- Comment #22 from gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com ---
Any progress on this? Or can an expert point to the code where the code is
implemented?
Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446468
--- Comment #21 from gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com ---
Another side effect of the bug is that when you are editing a line in dolphin,
all the other fields become white on white ie invisible.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457679
Bug ID: 457679
Summary: In Wayland the CTRL+ click doesn't work with
Latte-Dock
Product: lattedock
Version: git (master)
Platform: Archlinux Packages
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455513
--- Comment #11 from gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com ---
I agree with you that the way I (and probably others) scale the screen is
weird. The reasons are:
- widgets size is too big with uniform scaling. I saw there is some discussion
to have an
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455513
--- Comment #9 from gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com ---
Hello Nate,
I found the root cause:
it is in kstyle/breezestyle.cpp
***
//__
int Style::pixelMetric(PixelMetric metric, const
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455513
gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|NOT A BUG |---
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455513
--- Comment #6 from gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 150130
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=150130=edit
Dolphin with screen resized 150%
I tried to scale with video scaling to 150% and the result is ugly. I mean the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455513
--- Comment #4 from gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com ---
System settings, appearance, icons, configure icons size. I normally set small
icons to 32.
That's enough up to plasma 5.24.5.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455513
--- Comment #2 from gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com ---
Hello Nate,
agreed but before 5.25 I could scale like this. The proble is that small icons
are not sensitive to changing its size in system settings. I think it is a bug.
Gianluca
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455513
Bug ID: 455513
Summary: Tiny icons in Dolphin tree and in menu dropdown
Product: plasmashell
Version: master
Platform: Archlinux Packages
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445087
gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||g_...@hotmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446468
--- Comment #17 from gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to medin from comment #12)
> Created attachment 146158 [details]
> Dark shadow behind selected icons
Definitely the best solution
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446468
--- Comment #16 from gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com ---
I think that the best solution is to dralw a dark shadow around the folder
icon. It is definitely more consistent with the desktop behaviour. Do you
agree?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446468
--- Comment #9 from gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com ---
In reply to Nate: maybe a good solution is to draw a white or black shadowed
border on the icon to not have it merged with the selection
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447215
Gianluca Pettinello changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gianluca.pettinello@gmail.c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446468
--- Comment #5 from gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com ---
Is there any update?
Saw in Nate's post that Dolphin 22.04 will have full line selection. Maybe it
solves also this bug.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=446468
gianluca.pettine...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||g_...@hotmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428800
--- Comment #5 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
(In reply to Gianluca Pettinello from comment #4)
> (In reply to Nate Graham from comment #3)
> > Sure, that would be be great, thanks!
>
> Just done, so far no issue, I'm in X11 session
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428800
--- Comment #4 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #3)
> Sure, that would be be great, thanks!
Just done, so far no issue, I'm in X11 session
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428800
--- Comment #2 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #1)
> Are you still experiencing this with Plasma 5.22?
Hello Nate,
sorry for late reply.
No I don't experience flickering any more. I moved to Intel 2D graphics driv
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438874
Gianluca Pettinello changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gianluca.pettinello@gmail.c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413394
Gianluca Pettinello changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gianluca.pettinello@gmail.c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438494
Bug ID: 438494
Summary: Flickering when closing modal dialog
Product: kwin
Version: 5.22.0
Platform: Archlinux Packages
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
Severity:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433115
Gianluca Pettinello changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gianluca.pettinello@gmail.c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430891
Gianluca Pettinello changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gianluca.pettinello@gmail.c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409499
Gianluca Pettinello changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gianluca.pettinello@gmail.c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430436
Gianluca Pettinello changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gianluca.pettinello@gmail.c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428800
Bug ID: 428800
Summary: Screen flicker after long screen lock upon resume
Product: plasmashell
Version: 5.20.2
Platform: Archlinux Packages
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422023
Bug ID: 422023
Summary: Feature request: add minimize all on present windows
effect
Product: kwin
Version: unspecified
Platform: Archlinux Packages
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421273
--- Comment #1 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
Just to update, the git version doesn't have this issue while version 0.9.11-1
in Arch has
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421273
Bug ID: 421273
Summary: Slow zoom animation
Product: lattedock
Version: 0.9.11
Platform: Archlinux Packages
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
Severity: normal
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=411833
Gianluca Pettinello changed:
What|Removed |Added
Platform|Other |Archlinux Packages
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=411833
Bug ID: 411833
Summary: Krita crashes on close
Product: krita
Version: 4.2.6
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
Severity: normal
Priority: NOR
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409518
Gianluca Pettinello changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gianluca.pettinello@gmail.c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=365924
Gianluca Pettinello changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gianluca.pettinello@gmail.c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=408711
--- Comment #2 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
Ok, and sorry if my tone was harsh, since you work hard every day to make kde
better. If ever you consider one day to add transparency and blur to the
notification and to increase the border padding
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=408711
Bug ID: 408711
Summary: New notifications are opaque
Product: plasmashell
Version: 5.16.0
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
Severity: normal
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=405521
Bug ID: 405521
Summary: Blinking launch feedback wrong blinking
Product: kwin
Version: 5.15.3
Platform: Archlinux Packages
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
Severity:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379637
--- Comment #34 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
(In reply to Martin Flöser from comment #33)
> yes, as soon as gtk adds that property window management breaks
But if we added _KDE_NETWM_SHADOW property with shadw pixmaps, how can gtk
destroy t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379637
--- Comment #32 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
(In reply to David Edmundson from comment #31)
> How?
If we use the DialogShadows.cpp code and apply it to each Window that has
_GTK_FRAME_EXTENTS enabled (we can trap it in kwin events.cpp)?
Too n
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379637
--- Comment #30 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
(In reply to David Edmundson from comment #29)
> For an example see DialogShadows.cpp in plasma-framework.
>
> You'd have to get that done by the GTK process.
And if we trap it and force sha
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379637
--- Comment #28 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
(In reply to Martin Flöser from comment #27)
> the pixmap is created by the client.
Could you tell me in which point of the code?
Thanks :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379637
--- Comment #26 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
Coming back to the topic as I'm hard to give up if I think the goal is
reachable.
The function:
Xcb::Property property(false, id, atoms->kde_net_wm_shadow, XCB_ATOM_CARDINAL,
0, 12);
as it is cal
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=330820
Gianluca Pettinello changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gianluca.pettinello@gmail.c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379637
--- Comment #24 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #22)
> RESOLVED FIXED isn't an appropriate status if the issue of GTK3 headerbar
> windows not getting shadows hasn't actually been fixed.
>
> RESOLVED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379637
--- Comment #20 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
(In reply to Martin Flöser from comment #19)
> Ok, I think I need to explain more on the situation on X11. The problem is
> not that the code is fragile, undocumented or umaintained. The code i
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379637
--- Comment #17 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
I understand the point. My suggestions coming from my experience in a chemical
industry:
1) Be the teacher to the others since you have deep knowledge. Write a document
explaining the structure of kwin
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379637
--- Comment #15 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
I think discussion is getting too much emotional, probably because there is a
lot of past efforts and frustration due to gtk always changing cards on the
table.
Is it not better to force server side
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379637
--- Comment #6 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
Is it possible to implement 1) Server side shadows on both top level windows
and to popups and menus? It would give more consistency to the applications.
If we give each client the freedom to draw shadows
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=403440
Bug ID: 403440
Summary: Menu blur not working move to pop up menu
Product: Breeze
Version: 5.14.5
Platform: Archlinux Packages
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402730
--- Comment #7 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
Thanks Nate for the(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #6)
> You already can, sort of. What you can't currently do is choose the font
> size/style etc. just for headings. That's something we d
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402730
Gianluca Pettinello changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gianluca.pettinello@gmail.c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336617
Gianluca Pettinello changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|0.19.1 |1.6.0
CC
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391917
--- Comment #19 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
But can we trap a gtk window and let breeze make the shadow its own way? So we
get also consistency in the shadow rendering, while csd is against consistency.
Silly question: is it breeze or kwin who says
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391917
--- Comment #16 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
What you mean that gtk has to upload the shadow? Has gtk to fill an atom with
the properties of the shadow? Sorry if I say something wrong but I'm not an
expert.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391917
--- Comment #14 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
Going nowhere indeed :(
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391917
--- Comment #13 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
First of all I apologize for the late reply
@Martin
You are right indeed Gnome developers are difficult to convince.
I have a question.
If we use gtk-nocsd package (in Archlinux AUR) we get server side
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=391917
--- Comment #10 from Gianluca Pettinello ---
We all know that gnome developers are doing wrong because they build a DE based
on their view imposed to the commumity rather than listening to the needs of
the community. We also know that they regularly
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400634
Bug ID: 400634
Summary: No menu drop shadow in libreoffice, firefox and gtk
apps
Product: kwin
Version: 5.14.2
Platform: Archlinux Packages
OS: Linux
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400611
Gianluca Pettinello changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gianluca.pettinello@gmail.c
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379637
Gianluca Pettinello changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gianluca.pettinello@gmail.c
67 matches
Mail list logo
