https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #55 from Tore Anderson ---
> In my experience Akonadi based KMail with IMAP never really worked
Assuming KMail wasn't always «Akonadi based», I would agree with this.
I used to be a happy KMail user years ago, then I upgraded my dis
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
Tore Anderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |---
Status|NEEDSINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #49 from Tore Anderson ---
(In reply to Martin Steigerwald from comment #47)
> Tore, Gunther or someone else who commented here: Could you please check
> whether you still have those performance issues you reported there with
&g
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=277134
--- Comment #4 from Tore Anderson ---
Yes, this is still not working correctly, but it behaves a bit different than
in 2011.
With the two options enabled (which are now named «Caps Lock is also a Ctrl»
and «Left Ctrl as Meta»), this is the following
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=350521
Tore Anderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@fud.no
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387936
--- Comment #7 from Tore Anderson ---
Noticed something interesting now:
$ test -w /nfshome && echo rw || echo ro
ro
$ test -w /nfshome/bin && echo rw || echo ro
rw
This seems to match Dolphin's behaviour. I can use Dolphin to man
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387936
--- Comment #6 from Tore Anderson ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #5)
> Thanks for the new info. Can you provide details about your method of
> mounting it so we can try to figure out what combination of options triggers
> this bug?
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387936
Tore Anderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@fud.no
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361791
Tore Anderson <t...@fud.no> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@fud.no
--- Comment #
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363260
Tore Anderson <t...@fud.no> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@fud.no
--
You are rec
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=371228
Tore Anderson <t...@fud.no> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@fud.no
--
You are rec
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367892
Tore Anderson <t...@fud.no> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t...@fud.no
--
You are rec
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #46 from Tore Anderson <t...@fud.no> ---
By the way, if you need an IMAP account to test with, try the IETF mailing list
archives, which is available through anonymous IMAP (cf.
https://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/tools/trac/wik
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #45 from Tore Anderson <t...@fud.no> ---
Created attachment 106920
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=106920=edit
Temperature graph - KMail tests at 21:30-22:00 and 12:35-13:05
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #43 from Tore Anderson <t...@fud.no> ---
Created attachment 106918
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=106918=edit
I/O throughput graph - KMail tests at 21:30-22:00 and 12:35-13:05
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #42 from Tore Anderson <t...@fud.no> ---
Created attachment 106917
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=106917=edit
IOOPS graph - KMail tests at 21:30-22:00 and 12:35-13:05
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #44 from Tore Anderson <t...@fud.no> ---
Created attachment 106919
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=106919=edit
Load graph - KMail tests at 21:30-22:00 and 12:35-13:05
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #41 from Tore Anderson <t...@fud.no> ---
Created attachment 106916
--> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=106916=edit
CPU graph - KMail tests at 21:30-22:00 and 12:35-13:05
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are wat
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #40 from Tore Anderson <t...@fud.no> ---
Following the release of Fedora 26, I decided to test KMail again and compare
it with Mozilla Thunderbird, both using a completely empty UNIX account.
tl;dr: Compared to Thunderbird, KMail/A
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338571
--- Comment #15 from Tore Anderson <t...@fud.no> ---
Just upgraded to Fedora 24 and tried a fresh setup of KMail with two IMAP
accounts. Versions:
akonadi-1.13.0-102.fc24.x86_64
kmail-15.12.3-1.fc24.x86_64
No improvement is noticeable. Synchro
20 matches
Mail list logo
