https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
Keigh Rim changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||keigh@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
Dmitrii Chermnykh changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chermnykh2...@gmail.com
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
Robin Bankhead changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kde.b...@headbank.co.uk
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
Thomas Capricelli changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kdebugs.20.orzelf@spamgourm
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
Dominik Riva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dr...@protonmail.com
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
mira...@mirandastreeter.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mira...@mirandastreeter.com
--
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
Maximilian Böhm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@elbmurf.de
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
Anton Schenker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anton.schen...@yahoo.ca
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
Jack changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ostroffjh@users.sourceforge
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
lubimov.maxim+...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lubimov.maxim+...@gmail.com
--
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
Salvatore changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sannythebes...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
--- Comment #46 from Dashon ---
I am subscribed to this issue to get emails regarding work on this issue. I am
not here to be spammed by people ranting about how other people choose to spend
their time.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
brenb...@brenbarn.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||brenb...@brenbarn.net
--- Comment #45
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
--- Comment #44 from alexmatee...@yahoo.com ---
(In reply to Artem S. Tashkinov from comment #42)
> (In reply to Nate Graham from comment #39)
> > Sorry, how does it impair backup processes? I back up my whole home folder
> > every day and haven't seen
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
--- Comment #43 from tagwer...@innerjoin.org ---
(In reply to tagwerk19 from comment #41)
> ... I'll see if I can find the reference ...
Try:
https://discourse.nixos.org/t/how-to-configure-kde-properly-in-nix/21362
Shows that others are also
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
--- Comment #42 from Artem S. Tashkinov ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #39)
> Sorry, how does it impair backup processes? I back up my whole home folder
> every day and haven't seen any problems caused by the lack of this issue.
> Can you
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
--- Comment #41 from tagwer...@innerjoin.org ---
I remember a bug (somewhere) about needing to separate "configuration" and
"state". As I remember this was recognised as an issue and the work was
gradually happening. It's worth a nudge of
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
--- Comment #40 from Felix Miata ---
People with any sense don't restore * when they find they only need one app's
files or one file. That's ripe for expensive loss of totally unrelated data.
It's basically the same issue as wanting to clean out
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
--- Comment #39 from Nate Graham ---
Sorry, how does it impair backup processes? I back up my whole home folder
every day and haven't seen any problems caused by the lack of this issue. Can
you explain the impact you're seeing?
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
--- Comment #38 from Felix Miata ---
(In reply to Artem S. Tashkinov from comment #32)
> https://userbase.kde.org/KDE_System_Administration/KDE_Filesystem_Hierarchy
> This article applies only to KDE3 and KDE4. ~/.kde[0-9] hasn't been used for
> ages.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
--- Comment #37 from Nate Graham ---
It can be done in an incremental fashion whenever anyone wants, due to the
existence of fallback logic in KConfig. There's no pressing need to do this for
Plasma 6.0.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
--- Comment #36 from Artem S. Tashkinov ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #35)
> I don't have the time to work on this for Plasma 6, nor the motivation to
> make the time for it by re-arranging priorities. As I've said before, it's
> an
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
--- Comment #35 from Nate Graham ---
I don't have the time to work on this for Plasma 6, nor the motivation to make
the time for it by re-arranging priorities. As I've said before, it's an
extremely niche feature that only affects a subset of a subset
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
--- Comment #34 from Artem S. Tashkinov ---
Nate,
Would be great if you looked into it. The time is running low.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
Alex changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||agram...@gmail.com
--- Comment #33 from Alex ---
(In
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
--- Comment #32 from Artem S. Tashkinov ---
(In reply to Martino Fontana from comment #30)
> Adding to this, there's also the `KDEHOME` directory, which defaults to
> `~/.kde`.
>
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
--- Comment #31 from sourcemaker ---
Is KDEHOME still in use?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
--- Comment #30 from Martino Fontana ---
Adding to this, there's also the `KDEHOME` directory, which defaults to
`~/.kde`.
https://userbase.kde.org/KDE_System_Administration/KDE_Filesystem_Hierarchy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
sourcemaker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kde-bugzi...@aschoettler.co
|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
--- Comment #28 from Artem S. Tashkinov ---
What's the status of this feature request now that KDE6 is nearing its final
release?
I don't think it's gonna be a good idea to fix/tackle it past the first final
release.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
soredake changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|ndrzj1...@relay.firefox.com |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
--- Comment #27 from feat...@engineer.com ---
@tagwerk19, I'll look into these links.
Meanwhile, I've created a PR here:
https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kconfig/-/merge_requests/188
If anyone is willing to review, I'd appreciate it.
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
--- Comment #26 from tagwer...@innerjoin.org ---
(In reply to feature from comment #25)
> ... This had become much more pervasive a change than I had anticipated ...
It might be worthwhile posting a "heads up" on the Nixos forums.
There have been
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
--- Comment #25 from feat...@engineer.com ---
I've refactored most of the code. I now run into lots of deprecated warnings,
naturally :)
This opens new questions:
1. How do we want to associate keyboard shortcut settings? Do we keep them
outside, in
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
Ganton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ku...@gmx.com
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
--- Comment #24 from Nate Graham ---
Hey, that sounds like an eminently sane plan to me. I say go for it!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
--- Comment #23 from feat...@engineer.com ---
Going over the code, my suggestion is making an overload for KConfig
constructor, which takes an enum class ConfigAssociation { kde-app, plasma } as
a fourth argument, in addition to file, mode and type (but
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
Michael changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egge...@protonmail.com
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
--- Comment #22 from Joe ---
(In reply to feature from comment #21)
> (In reply to alexmateescu from comment #18)
> > (In reply to Joe from comment #17)
> > > Also chiming in that I never thought dumping everything in ~/.config was
> > > ideal and
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
Prajna Sariputra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||putr...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
--- Comment #21 from feat...@engineer.com ---
(In reply to alexmateescu from comment #18)
> (In reply to Joe from comment #17)
> > Also chiming in that I never thought dumping everything in ~/.config was
> > ideal and would love more organization, too,
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
--- Comment #20 from feat...@engineer.com ---
(In reply to Artem S. Tashkinov from comment #19)
> (In reply to feature from comment #15)
> >
> > And for a smooth transition, the load function can be wrapped with a try
> > catch clause that would try to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
tagwer...@innerjoin.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tagwer...@innerjoin.org
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
--- Comment #19 from Artem S. Tashkinov ---
(In reply to feature from comment #15)
>
> And for a smooth transition, the load function can be wrapped with a try
> catch clause that would try to load with the prefix, and if it fails look
> for the
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
alexmatee...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexmatee...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #18
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
Joe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jchevar...@gmail.com
--- Comment #17 from Joe ---
Also
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
--- Comment #16 from feat...@engineer.com ---
When I said wrap the load function in try catch, I meant put the try catch
inside the load function, not in the calling site. re-reading my comment made
me realize I've worded it badly.
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
feat...@engineer.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||feat...@engineer.com
--- Comment #15
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
jkhsjd...@totally.rip changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jkhsjd...@totally.rip
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
John changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ilikef...@waterisgone.com
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
petrk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pepk...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
Alexander Wilms changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||f.alexander.wi...@gmail.com
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
Dashon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sparky123558w...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
Mariusz Libera changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mariusz.lib...@gmail.com
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
Matthias Mueller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mat.muel...@mailbox.org
--- Comment #14
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
--- Comment #13 from Artem S. Tashkinov ---
(In reply to Volker Krause from comment #12)
>
> Please see my first reply: I'm not opposing changing this, I am opposing
> just adding a vendor prefix in the config file library (which is the
> component
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
--- Comment #12 from Volker Krause ---
(In reply to Artem S. Tashkinov from comment #11)
> If you're opposing to fixing this issue, it's worth closing as WONTFIX. As
> for me I will continue to use XFCE4. Yes, this bug is probably the biggest
> issue I
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
--- Comment #11 from Artem S. Tashkinov ---
(In reply to Volker Krause from comment #10)
This is all quite sad to hear.
Not meaning anything personal, but it all sounds like "We didn't put too much
thought into storing all the settings in ~/.config
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
--- Comment #10 from Volker Krause ---
(In reply to Artem S. Tashkinov from comment #9)
> I also don't quite understand the whole "migration" issue. I believe nothing
> should be migrated automatically. People who upgrade from KDE5 to KDE6 will
> have
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
--- Comment #9 from Artem S. Tashkinov ---
(In reply to Volker Krause from comment #8)
> I don't think KConfig is the right place for this. The library one happens
> to use for accessing a config file shouldn't just add its own vendor prefix.
> I can
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
Volker Krause changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vkra...@kde.org
--- Comment #8 from Volker
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
Nejc Bertoncelj changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@bertoncelj.eu.org
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
Jonathan Marten changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@keelhaul.me.uk
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrma...@earthlink.net
--- Comment #7 from Nate
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
Martino Fontana changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tinozzo...@tutanota.com
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||geezer-jobs
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
--- Comment #6 from Artem S. Tashkinov ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #1)
> This seems reasonable to me.
>
> Probably a KF6 topic though.
The bug/feature request has been laying dormant for two years and since KDE 6
is on the horizon, I
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
Jakub Kuczys changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@jacken.men
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
soredake changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ndrzj1...@relay.firefox.com
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n_s_mend...@hotmail.com
--- Comment #5 from Nate
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
--- Comment #4 from Artem S. Tashkinov ---
(In reply to Christoph Feck from comment #3)
> Looking at the directory listing at comment 0, I don't spot any non-KDE
> configuration file, so moving them all to a /kde subfolder won't gain you
> anything.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
--- Comment #3 from Christoph Feck ---
Looking at the directory listing at comment 0, I don't spot any non-KDE
configuration file, so moving them all to a /kde subfolder won't gain you
anything. Did I understand anything wrong?
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||johnnrgwill...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=422529
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@kde.org
Ever confirmed|0
74 matches
Mail list logo
