https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380257
Huon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Latest Commit||https://commits.kde.org/gwe
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380257
--- Comment #13 from Henrik Fehlauer ---
> I have found a way (patch incoming)
I'm curious ;)
> I would be in favour of switching everything to 'normal' widgets
Sure, we can try how this pans out, as long as we are careful not to
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380257
--- Comment #12 from Huon ---
(In reply to Henrik Fehlauer from comment #11)
> Hm, I think we have a more general problem here: Custom UI elements, not
> drawing in the chosen widget style and breaking if new features in the
>
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380257
--- Comment #11 from Henrik Fehlauer ---
Hm, I think we have a more general problem here: Custom UI elements, not
drawing in the chosen widget style and breaking if new features in the
underlying libraries are introduced (in this case
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380257
--- Comment #10 from Huon ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #9)
> I think the video HUD makes sense to always be dark, rather than trying to
> adapt to the active color scheme--at least as long as it remains a
> semi-translucent
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380257
--- Comment #9 from Nate Graham ---
I think the video HUD makes sense to always be dark, rather than trying to
adapt to the active color scheme--at least as long as it remains a
semi-translucent overlay. If we wanted it to match the rest
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380257
Huon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||h...@plonq.org
--- Comment #8 from Huon
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380257
Dr. Chapatin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|17.12.2 |18.04.0
--
You are
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380257
Dr. Chapatin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |17.12.2
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380257
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||junior-jobs, usability
--
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380257
--- Comment #7 from Nate Graham ---
I could have sworn they looked better, but maybe I was only looking in
Fullscreen mode. Looks like there's more to be done here.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380257
--- Comment #6 from Dr. Chapatin ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #4)
> It still looks exactly like it does in your original screenshot?
Yes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380257
Henrik Fehlauer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
CC|
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380257
--- Comment #4 from Nate Graham ---
It still looks exactly like it does in your original screenshot?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380257
--- Comment #3 from Dr. Chapatin ---
Which release includes the bug fix?
I see the same bug on Arch (plasma 5.11.3) and neon dev unstable.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380257
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380257
Nate Graham changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pointedst...@zoho.com
17 matches
Mail list logo